‘No One Is Above the Law’
Prof. Claire O. Finkelstein explores the Georgia district court decision denying Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadow’s request to move his case to federal court.
Learn MoreHow To Regulate with Excellence
Prof. Cary Coglianese discusses how regulators can sharpen their skills and produce better regulatory outcomes.
Learn More‘Human Questions of Character and Community’
Prof. Tobias Wolff: “We can and should interrogate the values and the approach to community that people exhibit when they ask to have their personal religious beliefs elevated into special legal privileges at the expense of others in public institutions.”
Learn MoreApplying a ‘Disability Lens’ to the SCOTUS Docket
Profs. Jasmine Harris and Karen M. Tani L’07, PhD’11 discuss their article, “Disability on the Docket” with the Center for Public Integrity.
Learn More‘Half the Police Force Quit. Crime Dropped’
“It’s no coincidence that the cities we most associate with violence also have long and documented histories of police abuse,” writes Quattrone Center Journalism Fellow Radley Balko.
Learn MorePenn Scholars Lead Thought Leadership on Supreme Court’s Regulatory Decisions
Leading lawyers and scholars examine the Supreme Court’s major regulatory decisions from its recent term.
Learn MoreScope and Limits of the Dormant Commerce Clause
At The Regulatory Review, Prof. Michael S. Knoll shares his insights on a recent Supreme Court decision that is “about much more than porkchops.”
Learn MoreSCOTUS Election Law Decision
Asst. Prof. of Law Michael Morse C’13 told Penn Today that the Moore v. Harper ruling is “a mixed bag.”
Learn MoreThe Path to Student Loan Forgiveness
Prof. Cary Coglianese says “the only sure-fire way to deliver comparably massive student loan debt relief will be to secure approval of Congress.”
Learn MoreQuestions Remain on Major Questions Doctrine
Without answers on what constitutes a “major question,” says Prof. Cary Coglianese, “the Court’s continued invocation of the major questions doctrine cannot help but continue to appear to many observers as essentially a judicial power grab.”
Learn More‘Blow to Equal Treatment in the Public Market’
“It remains to be seen how far this radical new doctrine will reach,” said Prof. Tobias Wolff on the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative.
Learn More‘Another Fractured Opinion’ on Personal Jurisdiction
Prof. Tobias Wolff opines that the Supreme Court’s decision in Mallory “may have major implications.”
Learn MoreImmigration-Enforcement Guidelines and Article III Standing
Prof. Cary Coglianese and Practice Prof. of Law Sarah Paoletti respond to the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Texas.
Learn MorePublic Marketplace Discrimination on SCOTUS Docket
Prof. Tobias Wolff writes that the upcoming SCOTUS decision in 303 Creative v. Elenis “threatens to be a blockbuster.”
Learn More‘Arbitrary Cruelty of Our Current Asylum System’
“We cannot turn our backs on Central American immigrants at the border,” writes Adj. Prof. Fernando Chang-Muy.
Learn MoreQuestions Remain After SCOTUS Trademark Decision
Prof. Jennifer E. Rothman discusses the Supreme Court’s narrow ruling in the Jack Daniel’s case and its implications for both that case and trademark law generally.
Learn MoreAdvocating for Voting Rights
Deuel Ross L’09 successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Alabama’s congressional map violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Learn MoreAI for the Antitrust Regulator
Prof. Cary Coglianese writes, “The same digital tools that drive innovations in the private sector can—and in some cases must—be deployed to improve regulators’ ability to oversee markets.”
Learn MoreFirst Amendment and Anti-Discrimination
“The Speech Clause of the First Amendment has never been a license for businesses to discriminate in the commercial marketplace,” writes Prof. Tobias Wolff.
Learn MoreDid SCOTUS Fix ‘Brown Shoe?’
“As other zombies, BrownShoe should be put back in its coffin,” writes Prof. Herb Hovenkamp at ProMarket.
Learn MoreFair Use in Visual Arts
Practice Prof. Cynthia Dahl writes that the Andy Warhol SCOTUS decision “has wider implications for other art forms, like music and adaptions of literary works.”
Learn More‘America’s Mothers Are Suckers’
“Mother’s Day is a celebration that inspires its purported honorees to reflect on the very nature of a consolation prize,” writes Prof. Tess Wilkinson-Ryan L’05, G’06, PhD’08 at Slate.
Learn More‘Fool Me Once’
“The fear of playing the sucker can make it harder to read your own moral compass,” writes Prof. Tess Wilkinson-Ryan L’05, G’06, PhD’08 at The Pennsylvania Gazette.
Learn MoreEqual Rights Amendment Advocacy
“The fight for the E.R.A… . should serve as a reminder that constitutional amendment is possible,” writes Visiting Prof. Kate Shaw at The New York Times.
Learn MoreInstitutional Investor Efforts to Promote Corporate Diversity
Prof. Jill E. Fisch analyzes institutional investor efforts to promote corporate diversity and, in particular, the rationale for these efforts.
Learn MoreRegulating Machine Learning
Prof. Cary Coglianese discusses the Biden administration’s recent actions concerning the federal government’s use of artificial intelligence.
Learn MoreEnding Mass Incarceration
At Slate, Seema Saifee, Quattrone Center Research Fellow, explores how incarcerated individuals have contributed to the conversation on reducing incarceration and crime.
Learn MoreProtecting Children’s Right of Publicity
Prof. Jennifer Rothman recently penned a piece at Slate exploring the “growing threat to the next Brooke Shields of the world.”
Learn MoreFox News Defamation Settlement
Prof. Cary Coglianese and Amanda Shanor, Asst. Prof. at Wharton, offer insight into the recent settlement in the Fox News defamation case.
Learn MoreWhat’s Next for Crypto?
CTIC Academic Fellow Giovanna Massarotto outlines the possible routes of cryptocurrency’s future.
Learn More