What Is Left of Agency Adjudication After Jarkesy?
Lecturer in Law Matthew Wiener writes, “A Supreme Court decision seemingly limited to securities fraud could imperil regulatory adjudication broadly.”
Learn More‘Recalibrating Supreme Court Terms Is the Long Game to Fairness’
Prof. Kermit Roosevelt analyzes what a world with Supreme Court term limits would look like.
Learn MoreLowering the Bar for Employees with Title VII Discrimination Claims
Civic Practice Clinic Supervisor and Lecturer Alia Al-Khatib discusses the Supreme Court’s latest decision on Title VII.
Learn More‘Stop Decriminalising Crime’
“When a gap opens between what the law punishes and what society believes should be punished, people lose respect for the law and are more likely to violate it,” writes Prof. Paul H. Robinson and Jeffrey Seaman L’27.
Learn More‘The Supreme Court Creates a Lawless Presidency’
At The New York Times, Prof. Kate Shaw writes that none of the Supreme Court’s precedents supports the Trump immunity decision.
Learn MoreSCOTUS Ruling on Trump Immunity
Prof. Claire O. Finkelstein and Prof. Cary Coglianese offer their insights on the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States.
Learn MoreSocial Media Content SCOTUS Decision
Senior Fellow Gus Hurwitz said, “It is hard to see how this [decision] doesn’t dictate the ultimate resolution of the case.”
Learn MoreObstruction Charge Narrowed for Jan. 6 Defendants
“Increasingly, it looks as though a majority of this Court is willing to bend the normal rules to favor Trump,” said Prof. Kermit Roosevelt.
Learn MoreOverturning Chevron
Prof. Cary Coglianese and Senior Fellow Gus Hurwitz offer their insights on the Supreme Court decision overturning Chevron.
Learn MoreContinued Access to Emergency Abortion Care
“The opinion does not explain why the Court took this procedural punt,” said Prof. Allison K. Hoffman.
Learn More‘A Right to a Better Decision’
Prof. Cary Coglianese writes that “public preferences for human decisions may give way in time to calls for governmental decisions made by artificial intelligence.”
Learn MoreThe Case for a Federal Grid Planning Authority
Prof. Shelley Welton proposes the creation of a public grid planning authority to develop grid expansion plans in the national interest.
Learn MoreSupreme Court Revisits Retaliatory Arrest Claims
Prof. Tobias Barrington Wolff comments on the Supreme Court’s ruling on the contrasting views of Justices Alito and Jackson regarding claims of arrest in response to protected speech.
Learn More‘Officers’ Failure to Appear in Court Undermines Justice’
Prof. Sandy Mayson advocates holding police departments responsible for their officers’ appearances in court.
Learn More‘What Sealed Trump’s Fate’
At TIME, Prof. Kermit Roosevelt writes, “State law that applies equally to all did what the special rules of the Constitution could not.”
Learn More‘Weaponizing Fitness to Serve Is Undermining Our Democracy’
At The Hill, Prof. Jasmine Harris and Laura Hannon SP2’23, L’24 write that “some politicians find success in being transparent about disability, but it requires diligence and defense.”
Learn MoreCivil Forfeiture Decision ‘May Present Hope As Well As Disappointment’
Louis S. Rulli shares his insights on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Culley v. Marshall.
Learn MoreAmicus Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump’s Immunity Claims
Prof. Claire Finkelstein, along with 14 national security and military experts, has filed an amicus brief in Trump v. United States.
Learn MoreEmergency Abortion Care
Professors Allison K. Hoffman and Kate Shaw explain the high stakes of Idaho v. U.S.
Learn More‘Don’t Be Fooled By Trump’s Failure to Endorse a Nationwide Abortion Ban’
“All of this is at stake in Trump’s ultimate lie: his claim to be a champion of democracy rather than the architect of its demise,” writes Prof. Serena Mayeri.
Learn MoreShifting Landscape of Reproductive Rights
Prof. Kate Shaw writes, “Woven throughout [two cases before the Supreme Court] are arguments that gesture toward the view that a fetus is a person.”
Learn MoreWhy the Supreme Court Should Clear the Way for a Pre-Election Trump Trial
At The New York Times,Prof. Kate Shaw argues that the Court should reject Trump’s immunity argument quickly to allow a criminal trial to proceed before the presidential election in the fall.
Learn MoreFeminization of Poverty and Women’s Leadership
Rangita de Silva de Alwis encourages UN Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) 2024 anti-poverty policymakers to “give women’s leadership and decision-making a fresh look.”
Learn MoreProtecting the Right to Seek Asylum
At The Hill,Transnational Legal Clinic Director Sarah Paoletti urges representatives to “take a long, hard look at the ways our immigration and deportation systems are failing people who are in harm’s way.”
Learn MoreSexual Violence as a Tactic of War
“If we take gender justice out of the criminal justice system, we are left with a system that only serves the criminal,” writes Rangita de Silva de Alwis.
Learn MoreExamining the UN Secretary General’s Independent Assessment of Afghanistan Submitted to the Security Council Under Resolution 2679 of 2023
“At the heart of the gender equality project,” writes Senior Adjunct Professor of Global Leadership Rangita de Silva de Alwis, “is the full and equal right to education of women and girls.”
Learn MoreThe 2024 Presidential Ballot and the 14th Amendment
“Hand your republic over to the enemies of democracy, and it could take a hundred years to get it back,” writes Prof. Kermit Roosevelt at the Los Angeles Times.
Learn More‘No One Is Above the Law’
Prof. Claire O. Finkelstein explores the Georgia district court decision denying Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadow’s request to move his case to federal court.
Learn MoreHow To Regulate with Excellence
Prof. Cary Coglianese discusses how regulators can sharpen their skills and produce better regulatory outcomes.
Learn More‘Human Questions of Character and Community’
Prof. Tobias Wolff: “We can and should interrogate the values and the approach to community that people exhibit when they ask to have their personal religious beliefs elevated into special legal privileges at the expense of others in public institutions.”
Learn More