Tag: Penn Program on Regulation

In The Regulatory Review, Prof. Allison Hoffman, analyzes the major health-related decisions of the Supreme Court’s last term.

In a concurring opinion in West Virginia v. EPA, Justice Gorsuch cited work published in The Regulatory Review and by Prof. Cary Coglianese.

The Regulatory Review recently featured two student pieces concerning the leaked Supreme Court draft opinion on abortion rights.

Ho recently co-wrote an article published in the Yale Law Journal on “how administrative law erased antidiscrimination.”

Sprenger wrote about the redefined scope of the Clean Water Act while Rohde’s essay addresses congressional action concerning suicide risks among LGBTQ+ youth.

Director Chopra previously served as a Commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission.

Chen’s research focuses on the regulatory barriers that prevent Asian and Latinx communities from participating equally in the American political process.

Coglianese and Lai caution that existing processes can sometimes be “far more problematic than their digital counterparts.”

Johnson’s lecture is the third of five Race and Regulation Series lectures scheduled this spring.

Feinstein’s lecture is the second of five Race and Regulation Series lectures scheduled this spring.

Coglianese predicts the Court will continue to “be suspicious of grand exercises of regulatory authority by federal agencies.”

“The prospect of automating a vast swath of governmental decisions … promises more than just a path toward more efficient delivery of government services. It can provide, at the same time, an important opportunity to lead toward a more empathetic government,” writes Coglianese.