Home
DGCL
Oral Histories
Sponsors
Resources
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., 457 A.2d 701 (Del. 1983)
Opinions
Briefs
Case Documents
Oral History Materials
Opinions
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5642 (Del. Ch. Jan. 30, 1985)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., C.A. No. 5642 (Del. Ch. Nov. 28, 1979)(Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., No. 58, 1981 (Del. Feb. 1, 1983)(Opinion Reversing and Remanding Court of Chancery Ruling)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., C.A. No. 5642 (Del. Ch. Feb. 9, 1981) (post-trial opinion)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., et al., No. 58, 1981 (Del. Feb. 2, 1982)(Opinion Affirming Court of Chancery)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., C.A. No. 5642 (Del. Ch. April 24, 1984) (Opinion After Hearing to Determine Standards)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., C.A. No. 5642 (Del. Ch. April 3, 1970) (Memorandum Opinion on Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., C.A. No. 5642 (Del. Ch. April 5, 1979)(Memorandum Opinion on Motion for Class Certification)
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., 457 A.2d 701 (Del. 1983)
Briefs
10.1.80 Plaintiff’s Post-Trial Reply Brief
11.9.78 Brief of Plaintiff Answering the Motion of the Signal Cos. to Dismiss and Quash
12.20.78 Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss of Signal Companies
2.21.79 Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Support of Class Certification
2.9.79 Answering Brief of Signal Companies in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Certification of the Class Action
3.7.83 Notice of Motion and Motion for Hearing to Determine Appropriate Standards
4.16.81 Appellant’s Opening Brief on Appeal
4.29.85 Plaintiffs Below-Appellants’ Opening Brief on Appeal
4.4.84 Plaintiff’s Pre-Hearing Memorandum
5.17.85 Plaintiffs Below Appellants’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Signal’s Motion to Affirm
5.19.80 Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Memorandum on Liability
5.20.80 Plaintiff’s Pre-Trial Memorandum on Remedy
5.3.79 Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Application for Certification
5.30.79 Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal of Interlocutory Orders
6.11.81 Lehman Brothers Answering Brief on Appeal
6.11.81 Signal and UOP’s Answering Brief on Appeal
6.8.79 Opening Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
7.24.85 Plaintiffs Below Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing En Banc or For Reargument of the Court’s 7.9.85 Order of Affirmance
7.27.79 Reply Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
7.27.84 Defendants’ Opening Brief After Damages Trial
7.27.84 Plaintiffs’ Opening Brief After Damages Trial
7.9.79 Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
8.14.81 Appellant’s Reply Brief on Appeal
8.18.80 Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge the Class
8.18.80 Plaintiff’s Opening Post-Trial Brief on Remedy
8.24.84 Defendants’ Answering Brief After Damages Trial
8.24.84 Plaintiffs’ Answering Brief After Damages Trial
9.19.80 Post-Trial Brief of Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb
9.19.80 Post-Trial Brief of Signal Companies and UOP Inc.
Case Documents
1.16.80 Answer of Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb to Amended Complaint
1.16.80 Answer of the Signal Companies, Inc. to Amended Complaint
1.16.80 Answer of UOP, Inc. to Amended Complaint
1.31.79 Affidavit of Merl Peek, Secretary of UOP, Inc.
10.21.81 Order for Rehearing and Determination by the Court en Banc
10.6.80 Transcript of Post-Trial Argument
11.2.81 Order Vacating Order for Rehearing and Determination
11.28.78 Revised Notice of Depositions of Certain Individuals
12.14.79 Order Granting Motion to Dismiss
2.1.79 Transcript of Argument on Motion to Dismiss
2.15.83 Mandate from Supreme Court
2.19.81 Final Judgment Order
2.19.81 Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal
2.20.85 Judgment Order
2.23.79 Transcript of Argument on Motion for Class Certification
2.8.79 Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Answers to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories
3.15.85 Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal
3.16.82 Order Granting Motion for Reargument
3.17.83 Transcript of Hearing on Motion to Approve Notice to Class and Defendants’ Motion on Damages
3.6.78 Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Fairness Opinion
3.7.83 Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Hearing to Determine Standards to be Considered at Fairness Hearing on Remand and to Vacate Discovery Pending Such Determination
3.7.84 Letter Opinion Setting Preliminary Hearing to Determine if Rescissory Damages Should Not Be Considered
4.1.85 Signal’s Notice of Cross Appeal
4.12.83 Letter Opinion Granting Motion for Hearing to Determine Standards
4.26.79 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
4.26.79 Order on Class Certification
4.27.79 Application for Certification of an Interlocutory Appeal
4.27.82 Notice of Motion and Motion to Withdraw the Appeal and Remand for Entry of Judgment as to Defendant Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb, Inc.
5.19.80 Trial Transcript (Proceedings Discussing Evidentiary Issues)
5.19.82 Letter Opinion Denying Motion to Dismiss Appeal
5.20.80 Trial Transcript (Proceedings Discussing Evidentiary Issues)
5.21.80 Notice of Motion and Motion to Enlarge the Class
5.23.85 Notice of Dismissal of Cross Appeal
5.25.79 Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal of Interlocutory Orders
5.25.83 Letter Opinion on Form and Manner of Notice to Class
5.26.78 Certificate of Merger of Sigco Incorporated and UOP Inc.
5.7.79 Letter Opinion Denying Application for Interlocutory Appeal
5.9.85 Signal’s Motion to Affirm
6.1.76 Lehman Brothers Memorandum to Shumway
6.10.83 Order Enlarging Class and Directing Notice to Class
6.18.84 Transcript of Day 1 Trial on Damages
6.19.84 Transcript of Day 2 Trial on Damages
6.2.82 Notice of Motion and Motion to Withdraw the Appeal and Remand For Entry of Judgment as to Defendant Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb, Inc.
6.21.84 Transcript of Day 3 Trial on Damages
6.22.82 Final Judgment Order in Favor of Lehman Brothers
6.23.80 Letter to Counsel Declining to Rule on 41(b) Motion
6.23.82 Excerpt of Transcript of Supreme Court Argument
6.23.82 Transcript of Supreme Court Argument
Order Granting Leave to Withdraw Appeal as to Lehman Brothers
7.16.82 Signal’s Letter to the Supreme Court Regarding Disclosure of Information
7.21.82 Appellant’s Letter to Chief Justice in Response to Payson Letter of 7.16.82
7.5.78 Complaint and Exhibit A
7.9.85 Order Affirming Court of Chancery
8.12.85 Order Denying Motion for Rehearing en Banc or for Reargument
8.13.85 Mandate from Supreme Court
8.14.81 Appellant’s Reply Brief on Appeal
8.18.80 Plaintiff’s Opening Post-Trial Brief on Liability
8.25.78 Answer of The Signal Companies, Inc.
8.25.78 Answer of UOP Inc.
8.25.78 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss of the Signal Companies, Inc. and to Quash Service of Process
8.28.79 Order Refusing Interlocutory Appeal
9.14.81 Excerpt of Transcript of Supreme Court Argument
9.14.81 Transcript of Supreme Court Argument
9.6.78 Answer of Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb, Inc.
9.6.78 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss of James Glanville
9.6.79 Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint
9.7.78 Stipulation Extending Time
9.7.79 Transcript of Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
Oral History Materials
