Skip to main content area Skip to main content area Skip to institutional navigation Skip to search Skip to section navigation

Sparer Symposium Focuses on Expanding Access to Justice in Times of Crisis

April 26, 2010
Individuals who can’t access the legal system are rarely the focus of discussion at law schools. But the 29th Annual Edward V. Sparer Symposium was devoted to their plight, and to expanding the legal services available to people too poor or disenfranchised to hire a lawyer.
 
One of the most prominent public symposia in the country, the University of Pennsylvania Law School hosts the Sparer Symposium each year to commemorate the life and work of the late Edward V. Sparer, who was a Professor of Law and Social Policy at the Law School.
 
At this year’s event, which was organized by the Toll Public Interest Scholars, lawyers and law professors discussed the current landscape of legal aid organizations and the biggest obstacles that still prevent so many people from accessing justice.
 
Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, was the symposium’s special guest. In a rousing speech at the end of the day, Perez informed the audience that many of the cases he sees at his current job feature pro bono counsel from large private firms: “That’s the only way some of these cases would have been brought.”
 
Perez urged law students to search their souls before deciding against a career in legal services. “Keep in mind, life is a team sport and this isn’t a dress rehearsal,” he said. “Too many lawyers don’t follow their heart and gut.”
 
In his keynote address, Peter Edelman, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, also encouraged law school graduates to directly expand access to justice for the needy: “Whether you do indigent defense on the criminal side or work with poor defendants on the civil side, whether you do it full-time or part-time at a firm, we need you,” he said.
 
Edelman also noted that the U.S. poverty rate today is approximately the same as it was in the 1960s, and called for impact litigation to promote more progressive economic policies.
 
In the second panel of the day, which was chaired by Yolanda Vazquez, one speaker described the “iceberg” of cases in the United States that never even get heard because the parties involved cannot hire legal representation.
 
“We’re looking at the few who get into the system, and stopping there,” said Jeanne Charn, a professor at Harvard Law School.
 
Charn also criticized law schools’ “much-commented-on disposition of amorality,” pointing out that law students learn how to reason well by their second year and should have more opportunities to gain practical lawyering experience. At Harvard in the 1970s, for instance, Charn helped set up a poverty law clinic to which 3Ls could devote their entire year.
 
Another panelist, Laura Abel, called for controlled, randomized tests to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal services programs, such as “lawyer for a day” initiatives where lawyers spend one day representing clients pro bono.
 
“We can’t merely ensure that litigants leave courts feeling satisfied,” she said. “We need to know that these programs are actually make the proceedings fairer.”