Author: Mary Shelly
Racially restrictive covenants were contracts in deeds to property used to segregate neighborhoods and prevent individuals from being able to buy property because of their race or ethnicity.
Seventy-four years ago, in the case Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), the U.S. Supreme Court held that using the courts to enforce racially restrictive covenants constitutes state action that violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Despite being legally unenforceable (and prohibited by the Fair Housing Act, passed in 1968), many of these restrictive covenants persist in the deeds of homes throughout the country.
Several news outlets - including theNew York Times and NPR - have recently reported on this issue and have highlighted various community-based projects around the country that are working to find and eliminate or disavow this discriminatory language and educate their communities about the ongoing harms of systemic racism. These projects include Mapping Prejudice at the University of Minnesota, Justice InDeed in Washtenaw County in Michigan, and Segregated Seattle, part of The Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project.
In recognition of the work still to be done and to reflect upon the hard work that went into fighting these restrictive covenants in the Shelley v. Kraemer case, we have chosen to highlight a few books from our collection that discuss the Shelley v. Kraemer case and/or racially restrictive covenants more broadly, as well as a few books about Thurgood Marshall who, before serving on the Court himself, served as counsel on one of the cases consolidated in Shelley v. Kraemer.
Chapter 15: “Shelley v. Kraemer: The Judicial Revolution Begins”
Chapter 1: “Shelley v. Kraemer: Racial Liberalism and the U.S. Supreme Court”