Skip to main content area Skip to main content area Skip to institutional navigation Skip to search Skip to section navigation

Clemency Video Project

Outline of the Elements of Clemency Videos

Length of Video

Relevant Dates
  • Date of the video
  • Date of execution if scheduled
Audience Specifically Addressed
  • State’s Governor
  • Pardon Board
  • Victims/Survivors
  • Defendant’s Family Members
  • Defendant’s Community
  • Activists
  • Policymakers
  • Broadcasters
  • General public (request is made that citizens support the clemency petition)
  • Target audience is ambiguous/unknown (narrative is aimed at no specific audience)
Defendant’s Demographic Characteristics and Background as Revealed in Video
  • Gender
  • Race/Ethnicity
  • Age at time of video (either a specific age or within these categories: <18, 18-25, 25-40, 40-60, 60+)
  • Age at the time of the crime
  • Education level
  • Prior/Other felony convictions
  • State convicted in
Victim Characteristics as Revealed in Video
  • Gender
  • Race/Ethnicity
  • Age
  • Relationship to defendant
  • Stranger to defendant
Primary Narrative Type
  • Mitigating Circumstances
  • Rehabilitation
  • Innocence
  • Procedural Irregularities
  • Sentencing Inequity
Secondary Narrative Type
  • Mitigating Circumstances
  • Rehabilitation
  • Remorse and Mercy
  • Innocence
  • Procedural Irregularities
  • Sentencing Inequity
  • Combination
  • None
Mitigating Circumstances Narrative Features
  • Mental Retardation
  • Mental Illness
  • Traumatized Childhood
  • Sexual abuse as a child
  • Specific stories of childhood abuse provided
  • Youth invoked
  • Elderly status invoked
  • Event in childhood analogized to the crime
  • Victim was culpable to some degree
  • Drug abuse/alcoholism
  • Treatment sought for substance abuse, but ineffective
  • Offenses against the defendant during incarceration
  • Introduction of evidence of mitigating circumstances denied at trial
Rehabilitation Narrative Features
  • Person has “changed”
  • Religious Rehabilitation
  • Specific religion given
  • Rehabilitation without religion
  • Third parties confirm that the defendant has changed
  • Good deeds in prison enumerated
  • Worse world without them (others say it would be)
  • Projection that the defendant will continue performing good deeds if allowed to live
  • Comparison of world if defendant was allowed to live versus killed
Remorse and Mercy Narrative Features
  • Admission of guilt or responsibility for the crime
  • Expression of remorse
  • Apology or expression of sympathy for the victim and victim’s loved ones
  • Plea for mercy by loved ones
  • Theoretical challenge to retributive theory of justice
  • Legal theory of the role of clemency included
  • Challenge to the death penalty in general (as inhumane, immoral, unconstitutional, etc.)
  • Emphasizes that the governor has control over the life of an individual
Innocence Narrative Features
  • Explanation of legal role of clemency as a check on judicial mistakes
  • Witnesses Speak
  • Problem with trial
  • Jurors acknowledge problem in trial
  • New evidence of innocence has arisen
  • Problem after Trial
  • No recourse beyond clemency
  • What problems occurred and why are explained
  • No reason why the defendant is innocent provided in video
Procedural Irregularities Narrative Features
  • Explanation of how mistake impacted trial
  • Emphasis on Clemency as a Final Option
  • Specific examples of trial irregularities given
  • Police Impropriety
  • Specific reasons why defendant is innocent
  • Jury Discrimination
  • Discrimination in jury selection
  • Prosecutorial abuse
  • Evidence tampering
Sentencing Inequity Narrative Features
  • Sentence of accomplice provided
  • Accomplice was more culpable than defendant
  • Life without parole was unavailable option at time of sentencing
  • Similar case(s) with lighter sentence provided
  • Jurors claim they would have sentenced differently
  • Compare sentence to an accomplice in the crime
  • Compare sentence to others with similar crimes
General Storytelling Techniques
  • Use of Narrator-identified or unidentified
  • Use of titlecards (text on screen)
  • Use of interviews
  • Defendant appears
  • Defendant appears confined by wire or glass
  • Defendant speaks but does not appear
  • Defendant’s absence is explained
  • Family Members speak
  • Expert Witnesses speak
  • Teachers speak
  • Social Workers/Advocates speak
  • Ministers/Spiritual Advisors speak
  • Fellow Inmates speak
  • Pen Pals speak
  • Friends speak
  • Prison officials/employees speak
  • Non-acquaintances speak (people the
  • defendant has not really interacted with)
  • Victim’s loved ones speak
  • Interviewer heard questioning people
  • Ending with call to action or other advocacy goals for audience
Visual Elements
  • Images of death chamber or house
  • Images of prison
  • Images of the crime scene and other pertinent locations
  • Images/clips of evidence
  • Images/clips associated with mitigating circumstances
  • Images of defendant before the crime
  • Images of defendant during trial
  • Images of defendant in prison
  • Images of defendant’s family
  • Images of the victim
  • Images of pertinent documents
  • News and archival footage
Audio or Sound Elements
  • Narration
  • No one speaks on behalf of defendant
  • A few people speak on behalf of defendant (no more than 6)
  • Many people speak on behalf of the defendant (more than 6)
  • Background music
  • Synchronous sound
  • Sound effects
Expressions of Emotions
  • 1 or more persons (other than defendant) cries
  • Defendant cries
  • Children speak on behalf of defendant
  • People beg for clemency
  • Impromptu interviews
  • People speak from pre-written segments
  • Portrayal of the death penalty process

Clemency Video Backstory

Production responsibilities of lawyers
  • Scriptwriter
  • Interviewer
  • Narrator
  • Producer
  • Cinematographer
  • Editor
Length of production time

Approximate cost of production

Distribution targets
  • Governor
  • Pardoning authority
  • Lawmakers and Policymakers
  • General public
Media deployed
  • Internet
  • Broadcast media
  • Private screenings
  • Public screenings
  • Disk duplication and distribution
Approximate cost of distribution

Response or action requested
  • Petition or letter writing
  • Donations
  • Marches or rallies
  • Defendant’s case
  • Defendant
  • Victim or victim’s survivors
  • Defendant’s family and friends
Outcome of case
  • Date of execution
  • Date of commutation
  • Current status