Tags: | 01 CA (12.1%), 02 TX (8.3%), 03 NY (6.2%), 04 FL (6.2%), 05 IL (4.1%), 06 PA (4.1%), 07 OH (3.7%), 08 GA (3.2%), 09 MI (3.2%), 10 NC (3.1%), 11 NJ (2.8%), 12 VA (2.6%), 13 WA (2.2%), 14 MA (2.1%), 15 AZ (2.1%), 16 IN (2.1%), 17 TN (2.1%), 18 MO (1.9%), 19 MD (1.9%), 20 WI (1.8%), 21 MN (1.7%), 22 CO (1.6%), 23 AL (1.5%), 24 SC (1.5%), 25 LA (1.5%), 26 KY (1.4%), 27 OR (1.2%), 28 OK (1.2%), 29 CT (1.1%), 30 IA (1.0%), 31 MS (1.0%), 32 AR (0.9%), 33 KS (0.9%), 34 UT (0.9.%), 35 NV (0.9%), 36 NM (0.7%), 37 NE (0.6%), 38 WV (0.6%), 39 ID (0.5%), 40 HI (0.4%), 41 ME (0.4%), 42 NH (0.4%), 43 RI (0.3%), 44 MT (0.3%), 45 DE (0.3%), 46 SD (0.3%), 47 AK (0.2%), 48 ND (0.2%), 49 DC (0.2%), 50 VT (0.2%), 51 WY (0.2%), Federal, Model Penal Code, National Commission |
Tags: | 02 TX (8.3%) |
§ 9.51. Arrest and Search
(a) A peace officer, or a person acting in a peace officer's presence and at his direction, is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to make or assist in making an arrest or search, or to prevent or assist in preventing escape after arrest, if:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the arrest or search is lawful or, if the arrest or search is made under a warrant, he reasonably believes the warrant is valid; and
(2) before using force, the actor manifests his purpose to arrest or search and identifies himself as a peace officer or as one acting at a peace officer's direction, unless he reasonably believes his purpose and identity are already known by or cannot reasonably be made known to the person to be arrested.
(b) A person other than a peace officer (or one acting at his direction) is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to make or assist in making a lawful arrest, or to prevent or assist in preventing escape after lawful arrest if, before using force, the actor manifests his purpose to and the reason for the arrest or reasonably believes his purpose and the reason are already known by or cannot reasonably be made known to the person to be arrested.
(c) A peace officer is justified in using deadly force against another when and to the degree the peace officer reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary to make an arrest, or to prevent escape after arrest, if the use of force would have been justified under Subsection (a) and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the conduct for which arrest is authorized included the use or attempted use of deadly force; or
(2) the actor reasonably believes there is a substantial risk that the person to be arrested will cause death or serious bodily injury to the actor or another if the arrest is delayed.
(d) A person other than a peace officer acting in a peace officer's presence and at his direction is justified in using deadly force against another when and to the degree the person reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary to make a lawful arrest, or to prevent escape after a lawful arrest, if the use of force would have been justified under Subsection (b) and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the felony or offense against the public peace for which arrest is authorized included the use or attempted use of deadly force; or
(2) the actor reasonably believes there is a substantial risk that the person to be arrested will cause death or serious bodily injury to another if the arrest is delayed.
(e) There is no duty to retreat before using deadly force justified by Subsection (c) or (d).
(f) Nothing in this section relating to the actor's manifestation of purpose or identity shall be construed as conflicting with any other law relating to the issuance, service, and execution of an arrest or search warrant either under the laws of this state or the United States.
(g) Deadly force may only be used under the circumstances enumerated in Subsections (c) and (d).
CREDIT(S)
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Current through Chapters effective immediately through Chapter 36 of the 2013 Regular Session of the 83rd Legislature
V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 9.52
Effective:[See Text Amendments]
Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness
Penal Code (Refs & Annos)
Title 2. General Principles of Criminal Responsibility
Chapter 9. Justification Excluding Criminal Responsibility
Subchapter E. Law Enforcement
§ 9.52. Prevention of Escape From Custody
The use of force to prevent the escape of an arrested person from custody is justifiable when the force could have been employed to effect the arrest under which the person is in custody, except that a guard employed by a correctional facility or a peace officer is justified in using any force, including deadly force, that he reasonably believes to be immediately necessary to prevent the escape of a person from the correctional facility.
Tags: | 20 WI (1.8%) |
West's Wisconsin Statutes Annotated Currentness
Crimes (Ch. 938 to 951)
Chapter 939. Crimes--General Provisions (Refs & Annos)
Subchapter III. Defenses to Criminal Liability
939.45. Privilege
The fact that the actor's conduct is privileged, although otherwise criminal, is a defense to prosecution for any crime based on that conduct. The defense of privilege can be claimed under any of the following circumstances:
(1) When the actor's conduct occurs under circumstances of coercion or necessity so as to be privileged under s. 939.46 or 939.47; or
(2) When the actor's conduct is in defense of persons or property under any of the circumstances described in s. 939.48 or 939.49; or
(3) When the actor's conduct is in good faith and is an apparently authorized and reasonable fulfillment of any duties of a public office; or
(4) When the actor's conduct is a reasonable accomplishment of a lawful arrest; or
(5)(a) In this subsection:
1. “Child” has the meaning specified in s. 948.01(1).
3. “Person responsible for the child's welfare” includes the child's parent, stepparent or guardian; an employee of a public or private residential home, institution or agency in which the child resides or is confined or that provides services to the child; or any other person legally responsible for the child's welfare in a residential setting.
(b) When the actor's conduct is reasonable discipline of a child by a person responsible for the child's welfare. Reasonable discipline may involve only such force as a reasonable person believes is necessary. It is never reasonable discipline to use force which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death or creates an unreasonable risk of great bodily harm or death.
(6) When for any other reason the actor's conduct is privileged by the statutory or common law of this state.
<<For credits, see Historical Note field.>>
Current through 2013 Wisconsin Act 13, published 05/18/2013.