Tag Index

Tags:01 CA (12.1%), 02 TX (8.3%), 03 NY (6.2%), 04 FL (6.2%), 05 IL (4.1%), 06 PA (4.1%), 07 OH (3.7%), 08 GA (3.2%), 09 MI (3.2%), 10 NC (3.1%), 11 NJ (2.8%), 12 VA (2.6%), 13 WA (2.2%), 14 MA (2.1%), 15 AZ (2.1%), 16 IN (2.1%), 17 TN (2.1%), 18 MO (1.9%), 19 MD (1.9%), 20 WI (1.8%), 21 MN (1.7%), 22 CO (1.6%), 23 AL (1.5%), 24 SC (1.5%), 25 LA (1.5%), 26 KY (1.4%), 27 OR (1.2%), 28 OK (1.2%), 29 CT (1.1%), 30 IA (1.0%), 31 MS (1.0%), 32 AR (0.9%), 33 KS (0.9%), 34 UT (0.9.%), 35 NV (0.9%), 36 NM (0.7%), 37 NE (0.6%), 38 WV (0.6%), 39 ID (0.5%), 40 HI (0.4%), 41 ME (0.4%), 42 NH (0.4%), 43 RI (0.3%), 44 MT (0.3%), 45 DE (0.3%), 46 SD (0.3%), 47 AK (0.2%), 48 ND (0.2%), 49 DC (0.2%), 50 VT (0.2%), 51 WY (0.2%), Federal, Model Penal Code, National Commission



§ 9.53. Maintaining Security in Correctional Facility

Tags:02 TX (8.3%)

§ 9.53. Maintaining Security in Correctional Facility


An officer or employee of a correctional facility is justified in using force against a person in custody when and to the degree the officer or employee reasonably believes the force is necessary to maintain the security of the correctional facility, the safety or security of other persons in custody or employed by the correctional facility, or his own safety or security.


CREDIT(S)


Added by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 512, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.


Current through Chapters effective immediately through Chapter 36 of the 2013 Regular Session of the 83rd Legislature



V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 9.61

Effective:[See Text Amendments]


Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness

Penal Code (Refs & Annos)

Title 2. General Principles of Criminal Responsibility

Chapter 9. Justification Excluding Criminal Responsibility

Subchapter F. Special Relationships

§ 9.61. Parent-Child


(a) The use of force, but not deadly force, against a child younger than 18 years is justified:


(1) if the actor is the child's parent or stepparent or is acting in loco parentis to the child; and


(2) when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is necessary to discipline the child or to safeguard or promote his welfare.


(b) For purposes of this section, “in loco parentis” includes grandparent and guardian, any person acting by, through, or under the direction of a court with jurisdiction over the child, and anyone who has express or implied consent of the parent or parents.


CREDIT(S)


Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.


Current through Chapters effective immediately through Chapter 36 of the 2013 Regular Session of the 83rd Legislature



V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 9.62

Effective:[See Text Amendments]


Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness

Penal Code (Refs & Annos)

Title 2. General Principles of Criminal Responsibility

Chapter 9. Justification Excluding Criminal Responsibility

Subchapter F. Special Relationships

§ 9.62. Educator-Student


The use of force, but not deadly force, against a person is justified:


(1) if the actor is entrusted with the care, supervision, or administration of the person for a special purpose; and


(2) when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is necessary to further the special purpose or to maintain discipline in a group.


CREDIT(S)


Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.


Current through Chapters effective immediately through Chapter 36 of the 2013 Regular Session of the 83rd Legislature



V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 9.63

Effective:[See Text Amendments]


Vernon's Texas Statutes and Codes Annotated Currentness

Penal Code (Refs & Annos)

Title 2. General Principles of Criminal Responsibility

Chapter 9. Justification Excluding Criminal Responsibility

Subchapter F. Special Relationships

§ 9.63. Guardian-Incompetent


The use of force, but not deadly force, against a mental incompetent is justified:


(1) if the actor is the incompetent's guardian or someone similarly responsible for the general care and supervision of the incompetent; and


(2) when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is necessary:


(A) to safeguard and promote the incompetent's welfare; or


(B) if the incompetent is in an institution for his care and custody, to maintain discipline in the institution.