Intellectual Property Law Research
PRIVACY LAW AND SOCIETY (3d ed., West 2016).
The Offensive Internet: Speech, Privacy, and Reputation, 26 ETHICS & INT'L AFF. 152 (2012). (book review)
Privacy and Confidentiality, in PENN CENTER GUIDE TO BIOETHICS (Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester, & Arthur L. Caplan, eds., Springer 2009).
The Immanent Rationality of Copyright Law, 115 MICH. L. REV. (forthcoming 2017).
The Folklore and Symbolism of Authorship in American Copyright Law, 54 HOUS. L. REV. (forthcoming 2016).
Stewarding the Common Law of Copyright, 61 J. COPYRIGHT SOC'Y U.S.A. 103 (2013).
Engaging Business in the Regulation of Nanotechnology, in GOVERNING UNCERTAINTY: ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION IN THE SHADOW OF NANOTECHNOLOGY (Christopher Bosso, ed., Johns Hopkins Univ./Resources for the Future Press, 2010).
First Generation E-Rulemaking: An Assessment of Regulatory Agency Websites, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-15, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy and University of Pennsylvania Law School Date posted to database: April 15, 2007 (with Stuart Shapiro).
Solving Ethical Puzzles to Unlock University Technology Transfer Client Work for an Intellectual Property Legal Clinic (September 30, 2016). B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L., forthcoming 2017; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 16-38.
Deepa Das Acevedo
Network Neutrality: The Debate Evolves, INT’L J. COMM. (2007).
The Question of Spectrum: Technology, Management and Regime Change, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. (2005).
COPYRIGHT LAW (Foundation Press and Thomson Reuters, 2012) (with Jane C. Ginsburg).
Geoffrey Hazard, Jr.
The Future of Neuroscientific Evidence, in THE FUTURE OF EVIDENCE: HOW SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY WILL CHANGE THE PRACTICE OF LAW 137 (Carol Henderson & Jules Epstein eds., ABA Publishing: 2011).
Quasi-Patents and Semi-Patents in Biobanking, in COMPARATIVE ISSUES IN THE GOVERNANCE OF RESEARCH BIOBANKS: PROPERTY, PRIVACY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY 251 (Giovanni Pascuzzi, et al. eds., Springer Verlag 2013).
R. Polk Wagner
Poisoning the Next Apple: How the America Invents Act Harms Inventors, 65 Stan L. Rev. __ (2013); U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 11-29. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1883821 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1883821
Unenforceability (February 22, 2012). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-28; U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-15; U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-10; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-28; 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies. (with L. Petherbridge and J. Rantanen)
PATENT LAW: CONCEPTS AND INSIGHTS (Foundation Press 2008) (with C. Nard).
The Supreme Court and the Future of Patent Reform, 55 FED. LAW. 35 (2008)
Be All You Can Be: Data-Driven Human Capital Policy (with James Heckman)
Cyber Espionage or Cyberwar?: International Law, Domestic Law, and Self-Protective Measures, in CYBERWAR: LETHICS FOR VIRTUAL CONFLICTS (Jens David Ohlin, Kevin Govern, & Claire Finkelstein eds., Oxford University Press 2015).
REGULATING THE CLOUD: POLICY FOR COMPUTING INFRASTRUCTURE (Christopher S. Yoo & Jean-Francois Blanchette eds., MIT Press 2015).
Antitrust, the Internet, and the Economics of Networks, in OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST ECONOMICS 380 (Roger D. Blair & D. Daniel Sokol eds., Oxford University Press 2014) (with Daniel F. Spulber).
NETWORKS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS: ECONOMICS AND LAW (Cambridge Univ. Press 2009) (with Daniel F. Spulber).