« Bear Stearns and its Shareholders--Skeel | Main | Angry Churches--Stuntz »

Should Obama Leave His Church?--Skeel

In the furor this week over the anti-American comments of Jeremiah Wright, the pastor of Barack Obama’s church in Chicago, the one question that’s gotten surprisingly little attention is the most obvious one: Should Obama leave his church?

The terms an economist would use to characterize his options are “exit” and “voice” (based on "Exit, Voice and Loyalty," a famous book by Albert O. Hirschman). When a person is unhappy with the direction of an organization in which she is involved, her principal alternatives are to campaign for change from within (“voice”), or to leave the organization (“exit”). The dynamics of the organization and the person’s stake will often affect her choice. If she is a tiny shareholder in a huge corporation, she may be more inclined to exit (by selling her shares), since the voice of one small shareholder won’t make much difference. If she cannot easily exit, on the other hand, or if she has significant influence over the institution, she will be more inclined to exercise voice, as with a very large shareholder.

In his speech Tuesday afternoon, Obama said that he could no more abandon Jeremiah Wright than he could abandon his own grandmother, despite Wright’s outrageous attacks on America and American policy. With one’s family, Obama was suggesting, exit isn’t really an option, and Wright is like family to him. For this reason, Obama chose voice: to confront Wright both directly and indirectly, and to condemn the statements (a bit late, to be sure, but better late than never).

I personally found this reasoning quite powerful, but it really answers only the question whether Obama should disown his relationship with Wright personally. It doesn’t address the question whether Obama should leave Trinity United Church of Christ, the church that Wright led for so many years. One way to answer this question is in political terms. Here, the most useful analogy (and disanalogy) it seems to me, is to a politician who belongs to a golf course or club that discriminates against blacks, women or Jewish people. In this case, exit is usually viewed as the only politically acceptable option. Why, given the usual reaction in discriminatory club cases, hasn’t Obama faced more pressure to leave the church?

I think there are at least two reasons. The first is that, unlike the discriminatory clubs, Obama’s church hasn’t adopted a fixed, explicit anti-American stance. Indeed, Obama and others have suggested that the pastor’s anti-American comments are at odds with his overall message. This has been hotly debated, but it does suggest that the church’s position is more complicated than with a club that adopts an exclusionary rule. Second, in the discriminatory club situation, a politician who wished to campaign for change would need to do so behind the scenes– after all, private clubs are by their nature private– and over time. But the public isn’t willing to be patient in these cases, which makes exit the only real option. Obama’s church, by contrast, seems to operate in a much more open, public, political fashion. This makes voice a much more realistic option for Obama. He can publicly reject Wright’s comments and, if he chooses to do so, both publicly and privately work for change in the church.

Those are the political options, it seems to me. But for one who has identified himself as a Christian believer, as Obama has, there is a far more important religious question: are the commitments of his church consistent with, or at odds with, the teachings of the Bible? I personally am uncomfortable with churches taking political stands, but even apart from that, it seems to me the church can speak out in favor of the poor and oppressed (a repeated theme in Scripture) without dishonoring the secular authorities (as Paul instructs in Romans 13). This, as I understand it, was a major theme of Martin Luther King’s ministry and of the Civil Rights Movement as a whole.

From a religious perspective, Obama’s options seem similar to his political options but the calculus is radically different. If he were to conclude that his church’s posture is inconsistent with Scripture, he would need to decide whether to work from within to change it or to exit. In American Protestant Christianity, the usual inclination is simply to leave. I confess it’s an inclination I share, but it seems to me that the Bible suggests that we should always at least try to work for change from within. (This is the theme, for instance, of much of 1 Corinthians). If Obama remains convinced that his church’s stance is fully Scriptural, on the other hand, he should continue to defend it, whatever the political implications.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments ( 5 )

You should read EJ Dionne's column today at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/20/AR2008032003021.html for how Dr. King felt about the Vietnam War.

I think you also miss an argument that Trinity Church's leadership has changed and the Rev. Wright no longer is the leader. In that light, we need to see if the church continues on the same path or if the new leadership will alter some of the message(s) offered by Rev. Wright.

You conflate Sen. Obama's using the Sermon the Mount to justify his support of same-sex marriages with his support of Trinity. He never used the Sermon on the Mount to support his church's political posture. That would be a false statement.

Lastly, you, as most people who right about religion, fail to define how the Bible and/or Scriptures should be followed. Exactly which parts are the most important and what, if any, interpretations should be taken. For instance, Trinity's notable 30 year outreach to the gay community might, by some interpretations of Scriptures, be outside of the Bible's directives.

This was a great post and I hadn't even realized that the question wasn't getting asked until I read it. I admit that I was thinking almost purely in political terms about this entire situation. Thanks for shifting my mindset!

Martin is right that I mistakenly took Obama's comments about the Sermon on the Mount and Romans out of context. I've edited those out of the post. As for King's hostility to the Vietnam War, that certainly became a major theme in his final years. But respect for the legitimate role of secular authority was, in my view, always at the heart of the Civil Rights Movement. That, and King's emphasis on relationship (a theme Bill has written on a great deal) were two of the things that made the Civil Rights movement unique.

I have had to leave churches in the past as I disagreed with what they were preaching or teaching. Personal attachment to a particular Pastor or church (friends, programs, etc.) can prevent people from easily changing to a new house of worship.

Usually, christians move out of a church when God direct us to leave not when man try to push us out.

It appear, Mr. Obama came into the church community as a community organizer.

When God's spirit appoints us to ministry, He anoints us with His power. We are never appointed to speak without also being anointed to serve. The appointment He gave Christ is our anointing to serve others by bringing the Good News, comforting the brokenhearted, and announcing release and freedom to the captives. The community organizer, Mr Obama, wanted to serve.

Ask: whom has God appointed for you to minister the Good News to? (reference Isaiah 61:1 the bible)
What is the good news for the Oppressed?
Yes, many are bitter and want a change.

Many things compete for leadership in our lives- emotions, beliefs, desires, and relationships. The sinking sand of human leadership buries us in hopelessness, but God's Spirit lights our paths so that we may move forward on a firm footing (Ps. 119-105)

Ask: what or who is taking leadership of your life?
(Holy Spirit Encounter Bible)

Should the Pope leave the Catholic Church because of problems the world cannot agree with?
Should the Pop work within the Catholic Church to bring about a change.
I respect the Pope and all Pastors.

Listen to Dr. King Speech on the war in Vietnam, and listen to Pastor Wright speech.

The catholic Church took part in the Civil Rights Movement.
The Catholic church walked with Dr. M.L. King.