A Message from the Dean
Confidential Sources on Trial
Shelter From the Storm
Harrison Report: Post-World War II Bombshell
A Case of Political Descent
Clinic Hits Thirty
The Brief
The Board of Overseers
Faculty News & Publications
Alumni Briefs
In Memoriam
Case Closed
Former Clerk and Penn Law Professor Spar Over Alito 1 - 2

NBA Lawyers Offer Courtside Look At League’s Legal Issues
Broad-Based Urban Courts Subject of Symposium
International Programs Continue to Multiply
THE SENATE FLOOR was not the only forum for contentious debate on the Supreme Court nomination of Samuel Alito. A lively disagreement on his record occurred as well during a Penn Law panel discussion in January.

Former Alito clerk Thomas Gentile, a partner at Lampf, Lipkin, Prupis and Pettigrow, praised Alito’s character and judicial restraint, while Penn Law Professor David Rudovsky criticized him for employing a conservative agenda that colored his decisions.

Alito won Senate confirmation on January 31, more than two weeks after this program.

“(Alito) tends to side with the government in virtually every case,” said Rudovsky, who is also a noted civil rights and criminal defense attorney. “He gives enormous deference to executive power and law enforcement … (and) has shown a rather strong hostility to claims of reproductive freedom.”

Next Page