A Message from the Dean
A Woman's Place is on the Bench
African-Americans Reach Out to One Another in New Alumni Group
Witness to the New Frontier
The World According to Charles Hill
The Brief
The Board of Overseers
Faculty News & Publications
Philanthropy
Alumni Briefs
In Memoriam
Case Closed
 
News & Events
In Gruss Lecture, Stern Connects Exodus Story To Modern Terrorism
 

 
FEATURED STORIES
In Gruss Lecture, Stern Connects Exodus Story To Modern Terrorism
Parents and Partners Day
LL.M. Summer Program, AKA ‘Comparative Law in Reverse’, Gives International Students Head Start in Law School
Lead Lawyer for Discovery Channel Often Finds Himself in Murky Legal Territory
John Kerry Visits Penn Law

ACCORDING TO THE TORAH, the ancient Israelites were ambushed on their exodus from Egypt by the ancient Canaanite nation of Amaleq. In reaction, God vows eternal war against this people and Israel is commanded to utterly destroy them, to remember, and never to forget their act of aggression. Since then, the mythic figure of Amaleq has been appropriated as an image for all the worst enemies of Israel, actual and imagined, from Crusader Christianity to current Arab terrorists and from Satanic evil to the human evil impulse.

In the Gruss lectures last fall, Visiting Gruss Professor Josef Stern, of the Department of Philosophy and Committee on Jewish Studies at the University of Chicago, showed how Moses Maimonides, arguably the greatest Jewish thinker in the rabbinic tradition, interpreted the biblical story of Amaleq and the rabbinic commandments to destroy the nation and never forget its evil in light of his medieval historical situation and his philosophical program.

On the one hand, Maimonides attempts to discourage, if not prevent, zealous anti-terrorists (in today’s terminology) from individually acting on the biblical commandments, spontaneously identifying enemies of Israel with Amaleq and then proceeding to annihilate them with scriptural warrant. On the other, he philosophically identifies Amaleq with Christianity, which he takes to be a form of idolatry, and interprets the commandments never to forget and constantly to remember Amaleq as injunctions to hate - to normatively oppose and never forgive, excuse, or disregard idolatry and its culture. Through this philosophical interpretation of the biblical story and commandments, Stern showed how Maimonides tried to correct potential abuses of Law while retain and even deepen its meaningfulness through changing circumstances.

 
Previous Page Next Article