A Message from the Dean
Made For TV
Law School is One-Stop Shop for Clerkships
In Career-Defining Case, Adelman Put Hinckley away
At Reunion, Sadler Flashes Back 40 Years
The Brief
Graduation/Reunion
The Board of Overseers
Faculty News & Publications
Philanthropy
Alumni Briefs
In Memoriam
Case Closed
 
Constitutional Scholar Cautions Against Bending the Constitution to Fight Terrorism 1 - 2 - 3

 
FEATURED STORIES
Economic Analyst Pans Rosy Projections in President's Social Security Plan
Death Penalty Opponents Hear Plea from Death Row Inmate
Pro Bono Placements: All Time High
APALSA Takes Up Asian-American Activism at Conference
2L Makes World Series of Poker Finals, Wins Cool Mil
Penn Law Places Two Editors on Prestigious Harvard Journal
“A terrorism exception does not have the promise of being a very finite exception to the constitution,” she warned. “Any war waged by terrorism, if it is a war, is waged without delineation in time or space. And under those conditions an emergency linked to the concept of terrorism is inherently vast and potentially not confinable.”

Sullivan acknowledged that the constitution is to some degree at the discretion of the president, but criticized the current administration’s use of military internment to expand that discretionary power, violating the rights of some American citizens.

“The constitution is not a thing, it’s a spectrum. It has a law part and a discretionary part, and the attempt by the Bush administration has obviously been to push as much as they can that’s ambiguous into the military part of the spectrum, a truly extravagant litigating posture which has taken place with respect to the mixed group of people called enemy combatants,” she said, noting with approval that the Supreme Court had rejected the administration’s position.

 
Previous Page Next Page