A Message from the Dean
Mission Iraq
A 1L Odyssey, Part 2
Isabelle Johnston Bids Farewell
Gloria Watts, Beloved Registrar, Gets Big Send-Off
The Brief
Graduation / Reunion
The Board of Overseers
Faculty News & Publications
Alumni Briefs
In Memoriam
News and Events:
Dyson Says Work Remains to Fulfill Promise of Brown v. Board of Education

Dyson Says Work Remains to Fulfill Promise of Brown v. Board of Education
Keedy Cup Goes to Team of Rubin and Gomez
Students Get Up Close Look at Workings of Pa. Superior Court
Head of Common Cause Decries Big-Money Politics, Bad Medicare Bill
Former NCC President Counsels “We the People” To Follow Museum’s Lead and Develop Philadelphia
Wax Exhorts Blacks to Take Responsibility for Academic Success
LALSA Celebrates Work of Latinos at Fun-Filled La Gran Fiesta
Hands-On Human Rights Seminar Debuts
Federal Housing Act Focus of Sparer Symposium
71 Percent of 3Ls Exceed Pro Bono Requirement
Who’s Who of Public Service
EJF Raises More Than $30,000
Penn Law Receives Rare Honor from Burton Awards
Design Award Goes to Roberts Hall Architects
Law School Appoints Wallace New Registrar
Kolker Brings Global Outlook to LL.M. Program
New Exchange Program with Japanese Law School

ASSESSING THE IMPACT of Brown v. Board of Education on its 50th anniversary, Michael Eric Dyson, a nationally known commentator on race relations, hailed the decision as a signifi cant event in the nation’s history, but said it has fallen short of achieving racial equality in schools.

He said suburban and inner-city schools, given funding disparities, continue to be anything but equal. Noting the economic gulf between white and black communities, he said poor schools don’t have second-hand books – much less new ones – or modern computer equipment.

“Can the superinformation highway have an off ramp in the barrio or the hood?” he asked. “We’re trying to get some wire.”

Dyson, the Avalon Professor of Humanities at the University of Pennsylvania, was the keynote speaker at a symposium on Race Jurisprudence sponsored by the Journal of Constitutional Law. He offered his thoughts seven months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the University of Michigan’s affirmative action policy. The symposium also drew legal scholars who discussed the historic desegregation decision and pondered future efforts to achieve racial balance.

Dyson called on the legal profession to end a system of racial preference that benefits the haves and hurts the have-nots. “We understand that affirmative action is not about giving somebody a shot who doesn’t deserve a shot, but you must understand that those who are victimized by the law must be defended by that very law.”

Previous Page Next Article