|
Tel: 215.898.7072
Fax: 215.573.2025
Email: sburbank@law.upenn.edu
Expertise
- Complex Litigation
- Judicial Administration
- Civil Procedure
Bio
Stephen Burbank, the David Berger Professor for the Administration of Justice, is one of the most influential and respected scholars of federal practice and procedure in the country.
[More]
Stephen Burbank, the David Berger Professor for the Administration of Justice, is one of the most influential and respected scholars of federal practice and procedure in the country. The author of definitive works on federal court rulemaking, interjurisdictional preclusion, litigation sanctions, and judicial independence and accountability, Burbank is also an authority on international civil litigation and has lectured and taught widely in Europe. Much of Burbank’s scholarship reflects insights and experience gained in work for the judiciary or Congress; he has served as reporter of judicial discipline rules for the Third Circuit and of that circuit’s task force to study Rule 11, has been invited to testify before congressional committees on numerous occasions, and was appointed by the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives to serve as a member of the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal. Burbank’s latest book, a co-edited collection of essays, explores the problem of judicial independence from interdisciplinary and comparative perspectives. Burbank, a Life Member of the American Law Institute, was an adviser to the Institute’s project on international jurisdiction and judgments, served for a decade on the Executive Committee of the American Judicature Society, chaired AJS’ Task Force on Judicial Independence and Accountability, and served as the Chair of the Board of Directors of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. He is Chair of the Selection Committee for the Berlin Prize Fellowships of the American Academy in Berlin. In November 2002 a federal court appointed Burbank Special Master of the National Football League upon the joint recommendation of the NFL Players Association and the NFL Management Council. In that role he resolves certain categories of disputes under a consent decree and collective bargaining agreement.
[Hide]
Representative Professional Positions
Penn Law - David Berger Professor for the Administration of Justice (1995 -); Acting Dean (1995); Robert G. Fuller, Jr., Professor of Law (1991-95); Professor of Law (1986-91); Associate Professor of Law and Associate Dean (1983-85); Assistant Professor of Law (1979-83)
University of Pennsylvania - General Counsel (1975-79); General Counsel and Assistant Professor of Law (1979-80)
Law Clerk to the Chief Justice of the United States (1974-75)
Law Clerk to Justice Robert Braucher, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (1973-74)
Visiting Professor - Harvard; Urbino, Italy; Pavia, Italy; Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; University of Michigan
Representative Publications
Federalism and Private International Law: Implementing the Hague Choice of Court Convention in the United States, JOURNAL OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, Forthcoming
[View Document]
An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Tenure of Supreme Court Justices, in REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT 317 (R. Cramton & P. Carrington eds., 2006).
Alternative Career Resolution II: Changing the Tenure of Supreme Court Justices, 154 U. PA. L. REV. 1511 (2006).
Judicial Accountability to the Past, Present and Future: Precedent,
Politics, and Power, U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. (forthcoming).
An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Tenure of Supreme Court
Justices, in REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT (2005).
The Politics of the Federal Judiciary: Tiered Appellate
Decisionmaking, JUDICATURE (July/August 2005).
Vanishing Trials and Summary Judgment in Federal Civil Cases: Drifting Towards Bethlehem or Gomorrah?, 1 JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES 591 (2004).
The Roles of Litigation, 80 WASH U. L. Q. 705 (2002).
[View Document]
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AT THE CROSSROADS: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH (with B. Friedman ed., 2002).
Procedure, Politics, and Power, 52 J. LEGAL EDUC. 342 (2002).
[View Document]
Semtek, Forum Shopping, and Federal Common Law, 77 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1027 (2002).
[View Document]
Jurisdictional Equilibration, the Proposed Hague Convention and Progress in National Law, 49 AM. J. COMP. L. 203 (2001).
[View Document]
Making Progress the Old-Fashioned Way, 149 U. PA. L. REV. 1231 (2001).
[View Document]
Procedure and Power, 46 J. LEG. EDU. 513 (1996).
Procedure, Politics and Power: The Role of Congress, 79 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1677 (2004).
[View Document]
REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND REMOVAL (1993) (with others).
Jurisdictional Conflict and Jurisdictional Equilibration: Paths to a Via Media?, 26 HOUS. J. INT'L L. 385 (2004).
[View Document]
RULE 11 IN TRANSITION: THE REPORT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT TASK FORCE ON FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11 (American Judicature Society 1989).
What Do We Mean by 'Judicial Independence?' 64 OHIO ST. L. J. 323 (2003).
[View Document]
Interjurisdictional Preclusion, Full Faith and Credit and Federal Common Law: A General Approach, 71 CORNELL L. REV. 733 (1986).
Asked by a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for his views on the "House Working Group on Judicial Accountability."
[View Document]
The Rules Enabling Act of 1934, 130 U. PA. L. REV. 1015 (1982).
For additional publications, please consult
Current & Recent Research
Current Working Papers
The Complexity of Modern American Civil Litigation: Curse or Cure?
Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability and Interbranch Relations
|
