Current & Recent Research at Penn LawThe Penn Law faculty are engaged in a wide array of scholarship in traditional, cross-disciplinary and cutting-edge areas of inquiry. This newly created section of our website, which we will continue to populate in the months ahead, gives you access and the ability to search current and earlier work. FEATURED RESEARCHQuick Links: 15 Most Recent | 15 Most Viewed | RSS Feeds | Search SEARCHEnter search criteria in one or more of the following fields.
37 publications matched your search.
Brady v. Maryland: From Adversarial Gamesmanship Toward the Search for Innocence?, in CRIMINAL PROCEDURE STORIES (Carol Steiker ed., 2005)
ASSEMBLY-LINE CRIMINAL JUSTICE (under contract with Oxford Univ. Press,
forthcoming 2011).
Apprendi and the Dynamics of Guilty Pleas, 54 STAN. L. REV. 311 (2001).
Apprendi in the States: The Virtues of Federalism as a Structural Limit on Errors, 94 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1 (Fall 2003).
Blakely's Federal Aftermath, 16 FED. SENT'G. REP. 333 (2004).
Bringing Moral Values into a Flawed Plea Bargaining System, 88 CORNELL L. REV. 1425 (2003).
Engaging Capital Emotions (with Douglas A. Berman) 102 NW. U. L. REV. COLLOQUY 355 (2008).
Exacerbating Injustice, Response, 157 U. PA. L. REV. PENNUMBRA 53 (2009).
Forgiveness in Criminal Procedure, 4 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 329 (2007).
Harmonizing Substantive-Criminal-Law Values and Criminal Procedure: The Case of Alford and Nolo Contendere Pleas, 88 CORNELL L. REV. 1361 (2003).
Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure (with Richard A. Bierschbach) 114 YALE L.J. 85 (2004).
International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism (work in progress, coauthored
with William W. Burke-White).
International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism, 59 DUKE L.J. __ (forthcoming January 2010) (with Stephanos Bibas).
Invasions of Conscience and Faked Apologies, in CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS (forthcoming Oxford Univ. Press 2009).
Judicial Fact-Finding and Sentence Enhancements in a World of Guilty Pleas, 110 YALE L.J. 1097 (2001).
Judicial Fact-Finding at Sentencing, in ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (forthcoming Dec. 2008).
Making Sentencing Sensible, 4 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 37 (2006) (with Douglas A. Berman), cited with approval in Cunningham v. California, 127 S. Ct. 856, 873 (2007) (Kennedy, J., dissenting).
Originalism and Formalism in Criminal Procedure: The Triumph of Justice Scalia, the Unlikely Friend of Criminal Defendants?, 94 GEO. L.J. 183 (2005).
Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial, 117 HARV. L. REV. 2463 (2004).
Pleas’ Progress (book review), 102 MICH. L. REV.1024 (2004).
Policing Politics at Sentencing, 103 NW. U. L. REV. (forthcoming spring 2009) (coauthored with
Max M. Schanzenbach and Emerson H. Tiller).
Policing Politics at Sentencing, 103 NW. U. L. REV. (forthcoming spring 2009) (with Max M. Schanzenbach and Emerson H. Tiller).
Political versus Administrative Justice, in CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS (Paul H. Robinson,
Kimberly Ferzan, & Stephen P. Garvey eds. forthcoming 2009).
Prosecutorial Regulation Versus Prosecutorial Accountability, 157 U. PA. L. REV. (forthcoming 2009).
Regulating Local Variations in Federal Sentencing, 58 STAN. L. REV. 137 (2005).
Restoration, But Also More Justice, in CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS 595 (Paul H. Robinson,
Kimberly Ferzan, & Stephen P. Garvey eds. forthcoming 2009).
Rewarding Prosecutors for Performance, 6 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. (forthcoming 2009) (symposium
essay).
Rita v. United States Leaves More Open Than it Answers, 20 FED. SENTENCING REPORTER 28 (2007).
The Blakely Earthquake Exposes the Procedure/Substance Fault Line, 17 FED. SENT'G. REP. 258 (2005).
The Heart Has Its Value: The Justifiable Persistence of the American Death Penalty, in CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS (Paul H. Robinson, Kimberly Ferzan, & Stephen P. Garvey eds.,
forthcoming 2009) (with Douglas A. Berman).
The Psychology of Hindsight and After-the-Fact Review of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, 2004 UTAH L. REV. 1.
The Real-World Shift in Criminal Procedure, 93 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 789 (2003) (book review).
The Rehnquist Court's Fifth Amendment Incrementalism, 74 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1078 (2006).
The Sixth Amendment and Criminal Sentencing (with Susan R. Klein), 30 CARDOZO L. REV. 775 (2008) (with Susan R. Klein).
Transparency and Participation in Criminal Procedure, 81 N.Y.U. L. REV. (June 2006), cited with approval in Kansas v. Marsh, 126 S. Ct. 2516, 2532 n.3 (2006) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Using Plea Procedures to Combat Denial and Minimization, in JUDGING IN A THERAPEUTIC KEY (Bruce J. Winick & David B. Wexler eds., 2003).
White-Collar Plea Bargaining and Sentencing After Booker, 47 WM. & MARY L. REV. 721 (2005).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 University of Pennsylvania Law School · 3400 Chestnut Street · Philadelphia, PA 19104 |
