Current & Recent Research at Penn LawThe Penn Law faculty are engaged in a wide array of scholarship in traditional, cross-disciplinary and cutting-edge areas of inquiry. This newly created section of our website, which we will continue to populate in the months ahead, gives you access and the ability to search current and earlier work. FEATURED RESEARCHQuick Links: 15 Most Recent | 15 Most Viewed | RSS Feeds | Search SEARCHEnter search criteria in one or more of the following fields.
97 publications matched your search.
'Not Guilty' Isn't Always 'Innocent', CHICAGO TRIBUNE, OP-ED., Feb. 8, 1994, p. 18.
A Brief History of Distinctions in Criminal Culpability, 31 HASTINGS L. J. 815 (1980).
A Functional Analysis of Criminal Law, 88 Nw. U. L. REV. 857 (1994).
A PRACTICAL THEORY OF PUNISHMENT: HOW, WHY & WHO TO PUNISH (forthcoming 2006).
A Proposal for Limiting the Duty of the Trial Judge to Instruct the Jury Sua Sponte, 11 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 325 (1974).
A Right to Bear Firearms But Not to Use Them? Defensive Force Rules and the Increasing Effectiveness of Non-Lethal Weapons, 89 B.U. L. REV. 251 (2009).
A Sentencing System for the 21st Century?, 66 TEX. L. REV. 1 (1987).
A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability, 23 UCLA L. REV. 266 (1975).
Are Criminal Codes Irrelevant?, 68 S. CAL. L. REV. 159 (1994).
Book Review: G. Fletcher, A Crime of Self-Defense: Bernhard Goetz and the Law on Trial, 74 A.B.A. JOURNAL 112 (Sept. 1, 1988).
Brotherly Intervention, N.Y. TIMES, OP-ED., Nov. 29, 1997, A25.
CRIMINAL LAW CASE STUDIES (3rd ed. West Group 2007) (2nd ed. 2002; 1st ed. 2000).
TEACHER'S MANUAL FOR CRIMINAL LAW CASE STUDIES (3rd ed. West Group 2007) (2nd ed. 2002; 1st ed. 2000).
CRIMINAL LAW CONVERSATIONS (editor, with Steve Garvey & Kim Ferzan) (Oxford 2009)
CRIMINAL LAW DEFENSES, 2 vols. (West 1984)
CRIMINAL LAW: CASE STUDIES & CONTROVERSIES (2nd ed. forthcoming Aspen 2008) (1st ed. 2005); TEACHER'S MANUAL FOR CRIMINAL LAW: CASE STUDIES & CONTROVERSIES (2nd ed. forthcoming Aspen 2008) (1st ed. 2005).
Can a Model Penal Code Second Save the States from Themselves?, 1 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 169 (2003).
Causing the Conditions of One's Own Defense: A Study in the Limits of Theory in Criminal Law Doctrine, 71 VA. L. REV. 1 (1985).
Codifying Criminal Law: Do Modern Codes Have It Right?, 5 CANTERBURY L. REV. 312 (1993).
Community Standards of Criminal Liability and the Insanity Defense, 19 LAW & HUM. BEHAV. 425 (1995) (with Daniel Bails, John Darley and Tracy Waxman).
Competing Conceptions of Modern Desert: Vengeful, Deontological, and Empirical 67 CAMBRIDGE L. J. 145-175 (2008)
Competing Conceptions of Modern Desert: Vengeful, Deontological, and Empirical, 67 CAMBRIDGE L.J. 145 (2008).
Competing Theories of Justification: Deeds vs. Reasons, in A.T.H. Smith & A. Simester, eds., HARM AND CULPABILITY 45-70 (Oxford 1996).
Concordance & Conflict in Intuitions of Justice, 91 MINN. L. REV. 1829 (2007) (with Robert Kurzban).
Crime, Punishment and Prevention, 142 THE PUBLIC INTEREST 61-71 (Winter 2001).
Criminal Justice in the Information Age: A Punishment Theory Paradox, 1 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 683 (2004) (reprinted in LEGAL ASPECTS OF TECHNOLOGY (ICFAI: 2008)).
Criminal Law Scholarship: Three Illusions, 2 THEORETICAL INQUIRIES IN LAW 287 (2001).
Criminal Law as an Instrument of Behavioral Control: Should Deterrence Have a Role in the Formulation of Criminal Law Rules? (2002).
Criminal Liability for Omissions: A Brief Summary and Critique of the Law in the United States, 29 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 101 (1984).
DISTRIBUTIVE PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW: WHO SHOULD BE PUNISHED HOW
MUCH? (Oxford 2008), also appearing in Spanish and Chinese.
Desert, Crime Control, Disparity, and Units of Punishment, in A. Duff, et al. eds., PENAL THEORY AND PRACTICE: TRADITION AND INNOVATION IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE 93-107 (Manchester Univ. Press 1994).
Dissenting View of Commissioner Paul H. Robinson to the Promulgation of Sentencing Guidelines by the United States Sentencing Commission, 52 Fed. Reg. 18121-18132 (1987); reprinted in 41 CRIMINAL LAW REPORTER 3174 (1987).
Dissenting View of Commissioner Paul H. Robinson to the Proposed Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts, 52 Fed. Reg. 3986-3988 (1987); reprinted in 77 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1112-1125 (1987).
Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioral Science Investigation, 24 OXFORD J. LEGAL STUD. 173 (2004) (with John Darley). [Appendix]
FINAL REPORT OF THE ILLINOIS CRIMINAL CODE REWRITE AND REFORM COMMISSION (State of Illinois 2003) (two volumes) (with staff).
FINAL REPORT OF THE MALDIVES PENAL LAW & SENTENCING CODIFICATION PROJECT (Republic of Maldives 2006) (two volumes) (with University of Pennsylvania Law School's Criminal Law Research Group).
FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL LAW (Little, Brown & Co., 2nd ed., 1995) (1st ed. 1988).
Fair Notice and Fair Adjudication: Two Kinds of Legality, 154 U. PA. L. REV. 335 (2005).
Final Report of the Republic of Maldives Penal Code Reform Project, (2006).
Four Predictions for the Criminal Law of 2043, 19 RUTGERS L.J. 897 (1988).
Hate Crimes: Crimes of Motive, Character, or Group Terror?, ANN. SURV. AM. L. 605 (1993).
How Psychology Has Changed the Punishment Theory Debate, LAW & PSYCHOL. (forthcoming, July 2006).
Hybrid Principles for the Distribution of Criminal Sanctions, 82 NW. U. L. REV. 19 (1987).
Imputed Criminal Liability, 93 YALE L.J. 609 (1984); reprinted in A CRIMINAL LAW ANTHOLOGY, A. Loewy, ed., (1992).
In Defense of the Model Penal Code: A Reply to Professor Fletcher, 2 BUFF. CRIM. L. REV. 25 (1998).
Incapacitation and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment, 24 LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR 659 (2000) (with John Darley and Kevin Carlsmith).
Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy, 81 S. CAL. L. REV. 1 (2007) (with John Darley).
JUSTICE, LIABILITY, AND BLAME: COMMUNITY VIEWS AND THE CRIMINAL LAW, (Westview 1995) (with John Darley).
Justice Can Never Come Too Late, THE WASHINTON POST, OP-ED., May 3, 2000, A-23.
Justification Defenses in Situations of Unavoidable Uncertainty: A Reply to Professor Ferzan, LAW & PHILOSOPHY (forthcoming 2005).
LAW WITHOUT JUSTICE: WHY CRIMINAL LAW DOESN’T GIVE PEOPLE WHAT THEY DESERVE
(with Michael Cahill) (Oxford Univ. Press 2005).
Legality and Discretion in the Distribution of Criminal Sanctions, 25 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 393 (1988).
Letter, Symposium on the Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Methods of Investigation of the General Security Service Regarding Hostile Terrorist Activity, 23 ISRAEL L. REV. 189 (1989).
Making Criminal Codes Functional: A Code of Conduct and a Code of Adjudication, 86 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 304 (1996) (with Peter Greene & Natasha Goldstein).
Mens Rea, in ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CRIME AND JUSTICE 995 (2nd ed., 2002)
Moral Credibility and Crime, ATLANTIC MONTHLY 72-78 (March 1995).
Objectivist vs. Subjectivist Views of Criminality: A Study in the Role of Role of Science in Criminal Law Theory, 18 OXFORD J. LEGAL STUD. 409 (1998) (with John Darley).
One Perspective on Sentencing Reform in the United States, 8 CRIM. L.F. 1 (1997).
Parole Holds: Their Effects on the Rights of the Parolee and the Operation of the Parole System, 19 UCLA L. REV. 759 (1972).
Prohibited Risks and Culpable Disregard or Inattentiveness: Challenge and Confusion in the Formulation of Risk-Creation Offenses, 4 THEORETICAL INQUIRIES IN LAW 367 (2003).
Proposal and Analysis of a Unitary System for Review of Criminal Judgments, 54 B.U. L. REV. 485 (1974).
Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice, 114 HARV. L. REV. 1429 (2001).
REPORT ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF MALDIVES: PROPOSALS FOR REFORM, prepared at the Request of the Attorney General of the Maldives, for the United Nations Development Program, (August 2004).
Reforming the Federal Criminal Code: A Top Ten List, in Symposium: Rethinking Federal Criminal Law, 1 BUFF. CRIM. L. REV. 225 (1997).
Report of U.S. and U.K. Delegation on the Criminal Theory of Anglo-American Law (with Michael Cahill & Andrew Simester) (2006) (in Chinese).
Restorative Processes & Doing Justice, 3 U. ST. THOMAS L. REV. 421 (2006).
Riot Responsibility, 66 N.Y. ST. BAR J. 6 (Jan. 1994).
Rules of Conduct and Principles of Adjudication, 57 U. CHI. L. REV. 729 (1990).
Sentencing Decisions: Matching the Decisionmaker to the Decision Nature, 105 COLUM. L. REV. 1124-1161 (2005) (with Barbara Spelman).
Should the Criminal Law Abandon the Actus Reus - Mens Rea Distinction?, in S. Shute, J. Gardner & J. Horder, eds., CRIMINAL LAW: ACTION, VALUE AND STRUCTURE 187-211 (Oxford 1993).
Some Doubts About Argument by Hypothetical, 88 CAL. L. REV. 813 (2000).
State's Weird Law Skewed Au Pair Case, NEWSDAY, Nov. 17, 1997,.
Structuring Criminal Codes to Perform Their Function, in Symposium: The Model Penal Code Revisited, 4 BUFF. CRIM. L. REV. 1 (2000).
Summary of the Structure of American Criminal Law, 23 TRIB. POL. SCI. & L. 98-111 (2005) in Chinese, translation by Prof. He Bing-song.
Testing Competing Theories of Justification, 76 N.C. L. REV. 1095 (1998) (with John Darley).
Testing Lay Intuitions of Justice: How and Why? in Symposium: Is Justice Just Us? A Symposium on the Use of Social Science to Inform the Substantive Criminal Law, 28 HOFSTRA LAW REVIEW 611 (2000).
The A.L.I.'s Proposed Distributive Principle of "Limiting Retributivism": Does It Mean In Practice Anything Other Than Pure Desert?, 7 BUFF. CRIM. L. REV. 3 (2004).
The Accelerating Degradation of American Criminal Codes, 56 HASTINGS L.J. 633 (2005) (with Michael T. Cahill).
The American Model Penal Code: A Brief Overview, 10 NEW CRIM. L. REV. 319 (2007) (with Marcus Dubber).
The Bomb Thief and the Theory of Justification Defenses, 22(1) IYUNEI MISHPAT (law journal of the Tel Aviv University law faculty) (March 1998) (translated into Hebrew); reprinted in English 8 CRIM. L.F. 387 (1998).
The Criminal - Civil Distinction and Dangerous Blameless Offenders, 83 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 693 (1993).
The Criminal - Civil Distinction and the Utility of Desert, in Symposium: The Intersection of Crime and Tort, 76 B.U. L. REV. 201 (1996).
The Danger of Defending the Denny Acquittals, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, OP-ED., October 27, 1993, A23.
The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law, 35 LAW AND SOCIETY REVIEW 165 (2001) (with John Darley and Kevin Carlsmith).
The Federal Sentencing Guidelines Ten Years Later: An Introduction and Comments, 91 NW. U. L. REV. 1231 (1997).
The Five Worst (and Five Best) American Criminal Codes, 95 NW. U. L. REV. 1 (2000) (with Michael Cahill and Usman Mohammad).
The Modern General Part: Three Illusions, in Stephen Shute & Andrew Simester (eds.), CRIMINAL LAW THEORY: DOCTRINES OF THE GENERAL PART, 75-102 (Oxford University Press 2002).
The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice (with Robert Kurzban and Owen Jones), 60 VAND. L. REV. 1633 (2007).
The Role of Deterrence in the Formulation of Criminal Law Rules: At Its Worst When Doing Its Best, 91 GEO. L.J. 949 (2003) (with John Darley).
The Role of Harm and Evil in Criminal Law: A Study in Legislative Deception?, 5 J. CONTEMP. LEGAL ISSUES 299 (1994).
The Role of Moral Philosophers in the Competition Between Philosophical and Empirical Desert, Symposium Issue, 48 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1831 (2007).
The Severity of Intermediate Penal Sanctions: A Psychophysical Scaling Approach for Obtaining Community Perceptions, 11 J. QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY 71 (1995) (with Robert Harlow & John Darley).
The Structure of American Criminal Law: A Brief Summary of Its Central Parts, in He Bingsong (ed.), RESEARCH ON CRIMINAL LAW THEORY SYSTEMS (forthcoming in 2004) (in Chinese).
The Utility of Desert, 91 NW. U. L. REV. 453 (1997) (with John Darley).
The Virtues of Restorative Processes, the Vices of "Restorative Justice", 1 UTAH L. REV. 375 (2003).
WOULD YOU CONVICT? 17 CASES THAT CHALLENGED THE LAW (NYU Press 1999).
Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment, 83 JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 284 (2002) (with Kevin Carlsmith and John Darley).
Why Does the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks is Just? Coercive vs. Normative Crime Control, 86 VA. L. REV. 1839 (2000).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2008 University of Pennsylvania Law School · 3400 Chestnut Street · Philadelphia, PA 19104 |
