|
Tel: 215.898.7068
Fax: 215.573.2025
Email: cstruve@law.upenn.edu
Expertise
- Civil Procedure
- Federal Courts
Bio
Catherine Struve teaches and researches in the fields of civil procedure and federal courts.
[More]
Catherine Struve teaches and researches in the fields of civil procedure and federal courts. She currently serves as reporter to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules and as co-reporter to a Third Circuit task force that has prepared model jury instructions in civil cases. Much of her recent research concerns federal appellate procedure.
[Hide]
Representative Professional Positions
Penn Law - Professor (2005 -); Assistant Professor (2000 - 2005)
Cravath, Swaine & Moore - Associate, Litigation Department (1996-2000)
Law Clerk to Judge Amalya L. Kearse, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1995-96)
Representative Publications
The Story of Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, in FEDERAL COURTS STORIES (Vicki Jackson & Judith Resnik eds., forthcoming 2009).
Power, Protocol and Practicality: Communications From the District Court During an Appeal, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. xxx (forthcoming 2009).
16A & 16AA FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (4th ed. 2008) (with the late Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller, & Edward H. Cooper) (volumes on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure).
Commentary on Class Settlements Under Attack, 156 U. PA. L. REV. 2143 (2008).
[View Document]
Greater and Lesser Powers of Tort Reform: The Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine and State-Law Claims Concerning FDA-Approved Products, 93 CORNELL L. REV. 1039 (2008).
[View Document]
Expertise and the Legal Process, in MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND THE U.S. HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: NEW CENTURY, DIFFERENT ISSUES (William M. Sage & Rogan Kersh eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
Constitutional Decision Rules for Juries, 37 COLUM. HUM. RTS. L. REV. 659 (2006).
[View Document]
The FDA and the Tort System: Postmarketing Surveillance, Compensation, and the Role of Litigation, 5 YALE J. HEALTH POL’Y, L. & ETHICS 587 (2005).
[View Document]
Tribal Immunity and Tribal Courts, 36 ARIZ. ST. L.J. 137 (2004).
[View Document]
Doctors, the Adversary System, and Procedural Reform in Medical Liability Litigation, 72 FORDHAM L. REV. 943 (2004).
[View Document]
Improving the Medical Malpractice Litigation Process, 23 HEALTH AFFAIRS 33 (2004).
EXPERTISE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LITIGATION: SPECIAL COURTS, SCREENING PANELS AND OTHER OPTIONS (The Project on Medical Liability in Pennsylvania 2003).
[View Document]
Turf Struggles: Land, Sovereignty and Sovereign Immunity, 37 NEW ENG. L. REV. 571 (2003).
[View Document]
Direct and Collateral Federal Court Review of the Adequacy of State Procedural Rules, 103 COLUM. L. REV. 243 (2003).
[View Document]
Realspace Sovereigns in Cyberspace: Problems with the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 989 (2002) (with R. Polk Wagner).
[View Document]
How Bad Law Made a Hard Case Easy: Nevada v. Hicks and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of Tribal Courts, 5 U. PA. J. CONST. L. 288 (2003).
[View Document]
The Paradox of Delegation: Interpreting the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 150 U. PA. L. REV. 1099 (2002).
[View Document]
Raising Arizona: Reflections of Sovereignty and the Nature of the Plaintiff in Federal Suits Against States, 61 MONT. L. REV. 105 (2000).
Note, Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection in a Utilitarian World: An Argument for Recomparison, 108 HARV. L. REV. 1697 (1995).
For additional publications, please consult
Current & Recent Research
|
