PolkWagner.com

Archives

What is the Law of Obviousness?
New Claim Construction Data
Good New Obviousness Paper
eBay v. MercExchange: A Victory for Patent Lawyers (and a loss for everyone else)
Phillips Analysis, Part 2: What Happened to the Judges?
Phillips Analysis, Part 1: The New Rule is There are No Rules
Phillips and Claim Drafting
Amicus Brief in Phillips v AWH
Happenings at the Federal Circuit: New en banc case
New Paper: Patent Portfolios
Dissenting from Claim Construction
Losing Copyright
Annenberg Talk

Categories

Federal Circuit
IP Politics
Patents

Entries

Menu

  • Home | News | Blog
  • Research Page | Papers
  • The Obviousness Project
  • The Claim Construction Project

About

I am a Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where I research and teach issues relating to law & technology.

  • email: polk@law.upenn.edu
  • details: curriculum vitae

Recent Posts

  • What is the Law of Obviousness?
  • New Claim Construction Data
  • Good New Obviousness Paper
  • eBay v. MercExchange: A Victory for Patent Lawyers (and a loss for everyone else)
  • Phillips Analysis, Part 2: What Happened to the Judges?

Archived Posts by Category

  • Federal Circuit
  • IP Politics
  • Patents

Archives

  • What is the Law of Obviousness?
  • New Claim Construction Data
  • Good New Obviousness Paper
  • eBay v. MercExchange: A Victory for Patent Lawyers (and a loss for everyone else)
  • Phillips Analysis, Part 2: What Happened to the Judges?

Forthcoming Publications

  • The Federal Circuit and Patentability: An Empirical Assessment of the Law of Obviousness (with L. Petherbridge)

Recent Publications

  • The Perfect Storm: Intellectual Property and Public Values, 72 Ford. L. Rev. 423 (2005)
  • Reconsidering the DMCA, 42 Hou. L. Rev. 1107 (2005)
  • Patent Portfolios, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1 (2005) (with Gideon Parchomovsky).
  • On Software Regulation, 78 S. Cal. L. Rev. 457 (2005).
  • Exactly Backwards: A Comment on Technological Exceptionalism in the Patent Law, 54 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 749 (2004).
  • Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Performance, 152 U. Penn. L. Rev 1105 (2004) (with L. Petherbridge).
  • Of Patents and Path Dependency: A Comment on Burk & Lemley, 18 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1341 (2004).
  • (Mostly) Against Exceptionalism, in F. Scott Kieff, Advances In Genetics 50:367 (2003).
  • Information Wants to Be Free: Intellectual Property and the Mythologies of Control, 103 Colum. L. Rev. 995 (2003).
  • A slightly more complete list can be found here (SSRN).

Ongoing Research Projects

I've embarked on a number of long-term, data-oriented research projects (in addition to the more typical 'law-review' type articles.)

  • The Obviousness Project: describing how § 103 is implemented, and its implications.
  • Claim Construction: Ongoing Empirical Assessment of patent claim construction by the courts.
  • FedCir: Data-Driven Assessment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (umbrella group for the above projects)
  • The En Banc Project: Looking at the trends in en banc treatment of patent cases. (coming soon)

Classes

  • Introduction to Intellectual Property
  • Patent Law & Policy
  • Advanced Topics in Intellectual Property Law

Credits

  • Research librarian: Tim Von Dulm, Biddle Law Library
  • Research assistant: Kristina Caggiano, class of 2007
  • Web Apps: Christine Droesser, Penn Law ITS

Contact Info

R. Polk Wagner
Professor of Law
University of Pennsylvania Law School
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia PA 19104

on the web: http://www.polkwagner.com/

email: polk@law.upenn.edu


 

Copyright © R. Polk Wagner.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

built with bbedit
made on a macintosh