FOR DISCUSSION
ONLY
UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT
__________________________________________
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
____________________________________________
Discussion Draft for
Drafting Committee Meeting December 6-8February 28,
20023
UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT
WITH PREFATORY NOTE AND REPORTER'S NOTES
Copyright ©20023
By
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
____________________________________________________________________ ________________________
The ideas and conclusions set forth in this draft, including the proposed statutory language and any comments or reporter's notes, have not been passed upon by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws or the Drafting Committee. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Conference and its Commissioners and the Drafting Committee and its Members and Reporters. Proposed statutory language may not be used to ascertain the intent or meaning of any promulgated final statutory proposal.
DRAFTING COMMITTEE TO UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT
WILLIAM R. BREETZ, JR., University of Connecticut School of Law, Connecticut Urban Legal Initiative, 35 Elizabeth Street, Room K-202, Hartford, CT 06105, Chair
MARION W. BENFIELD, JR., 10 Overlook Circle, New Braunfels, TX 78132
DAVID D. BIKLEN, Connecticut Law Revision Commission, State Capitol, Room 509A, Hartford, CT 06106
STEPHEN C. CAWOOD, 163 W. Short St., Suite 300, Lexington, KY 40507-1361
BRUCE A. COGGESHALL, One Monument Sq., Portland, ME 04101
FRANK W. DAYKIN, 4745 Giles Way, Carson City, NV 89704, Committee on Style Liaison
THEODORE C. KRAMER, 34 Allerton Ave., Brattleboro, VT 05301-2939
DONALD E. MIELKE, Ken Caryl Starr Centre, 7472 S. Shaffer Ln., Suite 100, Littleton, CO 80127
LARRY L. RUTH, 1233 Lincoln Mall, Suite 202, Lincoln, NE 68508, Enactment Plan Coordinator
HIROSHI SAKAI, 902 City Financial Twr., 201 Merchant St., Honolulu, HI 96813
YVONNE L. THARPES, Legislature of the Virgin Islands, Capitol Building, P.O. Box 1690, St. Thomas, VI 00804
MICHELE L. TIMMONS, Office of the Revisor of Statutes, 700 State Office Bldg., 100 Constitution Ave., St. Paul, MN 55155
KURT A. STRASSER, University of Connecticut School of Law, 65 Elizabeth St., Hartford, CT 06105-2290, Reporter
K. KING BURNETT, P.O. Box 910, Salisbury, MD 21803-0910, President
CARL H. LISMAN, 84 Pine St., P.O. Box 728, Burlington, VT 05402, Division Chair
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADVISOR
ROGER D. SCHWENKE, Carlton Fields, PA 1 Harbour Pl., 777 S. Harbour Is. Blvd., P.O. Box 3239, Tampa, FL33602-5950
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
WILLIAM HENNING, University of Missouri-Columbia, School of Law, 313 Hulston Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, Executive Director
WILLIAM J. PIERCE, 1505 Roxbury Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, Executive Director
Emeritus
Copies of this Act may be obtained from:
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
211 E. Ontario Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60611
312/915-0195
www.nccusl.org
UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Prefatory Note 1
SECTION 1. TITLE. 4
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. 4
SECTION 3. CREATIONSUPPLEMENTAL
PRINCIPLES OF LAW APPLICABLE. 8
SECTION 4. REQUISITES OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT. 9
SECTION 5. VALIDITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.. 10
SECTION 6. OTHER LAW REGULATING THE USE OF REAL PROPERTY 13
SECTION 7. REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT. 14
SECTION 8. RECORDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT. 17
SECTION 9. DURATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
COVENANTS. 8
SECTION 4. VALIDITY..
9
SECTION 5. OTHER LAW
13
SECTION 6. AGENCY
CONTROLS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS. 14
SECTION 7. RECORDING.
Alternative A. 16
SECTION 7. RECORDING.
Alternative B 17
SECTION 8. DURATION.
18
SECTION
9COVENANT 19
SECTION 10. MODIFICATION OR
TERMINATION. 19
SECTION 10.
ENFORCEMENT. 21
SECTION 11.
COORDINATION BY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT
20
SECTION 11. ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT 23
SECTION 12. COPIES TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT. 24
SECTION 12.
MARKETABLE TITLE. 25
SECTION 13. NOTICE.
26
SECTION 14. OFFICIAL
FORM : NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT. 276
SECTION 154. REGULATIONSRULES.
3028
SECTION 165. UNIFORMITY OF
APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION. 30
SECTION 17.
SUPPLEMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW APPLICABLE.
3028
SECTION 186. RELATION TO
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND
NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT. 3029
SECTION 17. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. 29
UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT
Prefatory Note
Environmental covenants are increasingly being used as part of the environmental
remediation of contaminated real property. An environmental covenant typically is
used when
the real property is to be cleaned up to a level determined by the environmental risks posed,
rather than to unrestricted use standards. Such risk based remediation is both environmentally
and economically preferable in many circumstances, although it will often authorizeallow the
parties to leave residual contamination in the real property. An environmental covenant is then
used to implement this risk
-based cleanup by controlling the risks presented by that
residual
contamination.
There are
twoTwo principal policies to beare served by
confirming the validity of
environmental covenants. One is to insureensure that land use
restrictions, mandated
environmental monitoring
requirements, and a wide range of common engineering controls
designed to control the environmental risk of residual contamination will be reflected on the
land records and effectively enforced over time as a valid real property servitude. A variety of
common law doctrines - the same doctrines whichthat led to adoption of
the Uniform
Conservation Easement Act - cast doubt on such enforceability and this Act addresses those
matters.
A second important policy served by this Act is the return of previously
contaminated
property, often located in urban areas, to the stream of commerce. The environmental and real
property legal communities have often been unable
to identify a common set of principles
applicable to such properties. The frequent result
has been that these
properties remain vacant,
dangerous and unproductive. This is an undesirable
outcome for communities seeking to return
once important commercial sites to productive use. This Act should significantly aid in that
effort by offering a clear and objective process for creating, modifying or terminating
environmental covenants and for recording these actions in recorded instruments which will be
reflected in the title abstract of the property in question.
Of course, risk -based remediation must be
used carefully so that it
actuallythe remedial
steps taken controls the
risk presented by the residual contamination which remains in the real
property and thereby protects
human health and the environment. When risk
-based remediation
imposes restrictions on how the property may be used after the cleanup, requires continued
monitoring of the site, or requires construction of permanent containment or other remedial
structures on the site, environmental covenants are a
crucial tools to make these restrictions and
requirements effective. Yet
environmental covenants can do so only if their legal status under
state property law and their practical enforceability are assured, as this proposed [Uniform Act]
seeks to do.
It is important to emphasize that environmental covenants exist in a larger context of environmental remediation regulation, and they must be considered within that larger context. Thus, environmental remediation is usually based on a statutory command, overseen by a public regulatory body, and governed by substantial regulatory controls that implement many requirements in addition to covenants. Environmental covenants are one tool used to accomplish remediation.
Environmental covenants may be used as part
ofto ensure that the property restrictions
imposed in the remedial decision regulatory process toremain effective, and thus
protect the
public from residual contamination that remains, while also permitting re-use of
the site in an
economically valuable way. Environmental remediation projects may be done in a widely
diverse array of contamination fact patterns and regulatory contexts. For example,
the
remediation may be done at a large industrial operating or waste disposal site. In such a
situation, the cleanup could be done under either federal
CERCLA or RCRA authority. These
federal statutesfederal Comprehensive Environmental Response
Cleanup Liability Act
(CERCLA) authority. CERCLA would also apply to remediation done at Department of
Defense or Department of Energy sites that are anticipated to be transferred out of federal
ownership.
In other situations, state law and regulation will be a more important source of regulatory policy. State law is given a role to play in the federal environmental policy discussed above. Beyond this, state law may be the primary source of regulatory authority for many remediation projects. These may include larger sites and will often include smaller, typically urban brownfield sites. In addition, many states authorize and supervise voluntary cleanup efforts, and these also may find environmental covenants a useful policy tool. With both state and federal environmental remediation projects, the applicable cleanup statutes and regulations will provide the basis for the restrictions and controls to be included in the resulting environmental covenants.
This Act is intended to apply to environmental use restrictions from residual
contamination in any of these different situations. Once the governing regulatory system and the
property owner have determined to use a risk
-based approach to cleanup to protect the public
from residual contamination, this Act supplies the legal infrastructure for creating and enforcing
the implementing environmental covenant under state law.
This Act contemplates a situation where a risk based clean-up is agreed to by the
regulatory agency and the parties responsible for the clean-up, potentially including the fee
owner and the owners of other interests in the property. As a consequence of that agreement, the
Act assumes those parties will each negotiate the terms of and then sign the covenant.
The Act assumes the current owners will sign the covenant. Cooperation is not always
possible, however. State and federal regulatory systems make a number of parties, in addition to
the current owner of a fee simple or some other interests, potentially liable for the cost of
remediation of contaminated real property. As a result, a remediation project may proceed even
though an owner is no longer present or interested in the property. In those circumstances, the
remediation project would be conducted pursuant to regulatory orders and could be financed
either by other liable parties or by public funds.
However, an environmental covenant may still
be a useful tool in implementing the remediation project even in these situations.
When an owner is either
unavailable or unwilling to participate in the environmental
response project, it may be appropriate to condemn and take a partial interest in the real property
in order to be able to record a valid servitude on it. Under the law of some states, states have the
power to take that owner's interest by condemnation proceedings, paying the value of the interest
taken, and then enter an environmental covenant as an owner. Where there is substantial
contamination the property may have little or no market value, and the court presumably would
take the cost of remediation into account in establishing the fair market value of the interest
taken. See, e.g., Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC Partnership, 256 Conn. 813, 776
A.2d 1068 (2001). Although effective implementation of this Act may require that the state have
a power of condemnation, this
Act does not provide a substantive statutory basis for that power,
and the State must therefore rely on other State law. Each State considering adoption of this Act
should ensure that such a condemnation power is available for this purpose.
Similarly, while this Act provides substantive law governing creation, modification, and termination of environmental covenants, it does not include special administrative procedures for these and does not change the remedial decision making process. Rather, the Act presumes that the State's general administrative law or any specific procedure governing the environmental response project would apply to these activities.
Finally, this Act does not
include a section of policy and legislative findings, although
some states may choose to use such a section. If such a section is desired, the following version,
taken from the Colorado Statute, C.S.R.A. §25-15-317, may be appropriate.
Policy and Legislative Findings.
The [insert name of General Assembly or other State Legislative Body] declares that it is in the public interest to ensure that environmental response projects protect human health and the environment. The [General Assembly] finds that environmental response projects may leave residual contamination at levels that have been determined to be safe for a specific use, but not all uses, and may incorporate activity and use limitations that must be maintained or protected against damage to remain effective. The [General Assembly] further finds that in such cases, it is necessary to provide an effective and enforceable means to ensure the required activity and use limitations remain effective for as long as any residual contamination poses environmental risk. The [General Assembly] therefore declares that it is in the public interest to create environmental covenants to effectuate environmental response projects which protect human health and the environment.
UNIFORM ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANTS ACT
SECTION 1. TITLE. This [Act] may be cited as the Uniform Environmental Covenants [Act].
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. In this [Act]:
(1) "Activity and use limitations" means restrictions or obligations
with respect to real
property contained in an environmental
covenant.
(2) "Affected local government" means a county, city, municipality, or other unit
of
local government in which any
real property subject to an environmental covenant is located.
(3) "Agency" means the state or federal governmental body that determines or
approves
the environmental response project requiringthat includes
creation of an environmental covenant.
The term includes the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection].
(4) "Environmental covenant" means a
servitude that imposes specified
activity and
use limitations on real property described in the servitude to
implementarising under an
environmental response project, that imposes activity and
satisfies the requirements of Section 3
of this [Act]use limitations.
(5) "Environmental response project" means a plan or work performed for
environmental
remediation of real property, conducted: (A) under: (a) a federal or
state governmental program requiring
environmental remediation of real property, including [insert references to state law requiring
environmental remediation], or
(B) incident to closing of a solid or hazardous waste management unit if the closing is conducted with approval of an agency; or
(bC) under a
program to doof
voluntary remediation of real property, by owners of
real property or other persons, subject to approval and supervision by a
governmental
bodyauthority or by
a person authorized by a governmental bodyauthority or by
statute.
(6) "Holder" means a person, other than an
agency, affected local
government, or other
governmental body whichthat is named as a
holder in an environmental covenant. The rights and
duties of a holder is described in Section 4(f) of this [Act].
(7) "Interested party" means any person, other than an owner, that
holdshas an interest
in
the real property that is subject to an environmental covenant. The term includes a person
who
holds only a right of possessionthat has an interest in the real
property, and a person who holds
the interest solely created by as security for an
obligationinstrument.
(8) "Owner" means a person that holds the fee simple interest in real property that is
subject to an environmental covenant.
(9) "Person" means an individual,; corporation,; business trust,; estate,; trust,;
partnership,;
limited liability company,; association, joint venture,; joint venture;
government;
governmental subdivision, agency, instrumentality or body; public corporation,; or any other
legal or commercial entity.
(10) "Prior covenant" means a record that:
(aA) creates
activity and use limitations with respect to real
property;
(bB) was required as part of arose
under an environmental response project; and
(cC) was
agreed to before [the effective date of this [Act]].
(11) "Record" means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
(12) "Security instrument" means a mortgage, deed of trust, security deed, contract for deed, land sale contract, lease, or other document that creates or provides for an interest in real property to secure payment or performance of an obligation, whether by acquisition or retention of a lien, a lessor's interest under a lease, or title to the real property.
(13) "Sign" means,:
(A) to execute or adopt a tangible symbol with present
intent to authenticate or adopt
a record, to execute or adopt a tangible symbol
or
(B) to attach
to or logically associate with the
record an electronic sound, symbol, or
process.
(13) to
or with a record with the present intent to authenticate the record
(14) "State" means a Sstate of the United States,
the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico,
the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction
of the United States.
Reporter's Notes
The following are examples of subsection (1) activity and use limitations:
(1) a prohibition or limitation of one or more uses of or activities on the real property, including restrictions on residential use, drilling for or pumping groundwater, or interference with activity and use limitations or other remedies,
(2) an activity required to be conducted on the real property, including monitoring, reporting, or operating procedures and maintenance for physical controls or devices,
(3) any right of access necessary to implement the activity and use limitations, and
(4) any physical structure or device required to by placed on the real property.
The governmental body with responsibility for the environmental response project in
question is the authorized agency
under this Act. This agency will supply the public supervision
necessary to protect human health and the environment in creating and modifying the
environmental covenant. The agency, for purposes of this Act, may be either a federal
government entity or the appropriate state regulatory agency for environmental protection.
Subsection (4) states that an environmental covenant is created to implement an environmental response project. An environmental response project may determine, in some circumstances, to leave some residual contamination on the real property. This may be done because complete cleanup is technologically impossible, or because it is either ecologically or economically undesirable. In this situation, the environmental response project may use activity and use limitations to control residual risk which results from contamination remaining in real property. An environmental covenant is then created to ensure that the activity and use limitations are both legally and practically enforceable.
"Environmental response projects" covered by subsection (5) may be undertaken pursuant to authorization by one of several different statutes. Subsection (5)(a) specifically covers remediation projects required under state law. However, the subsection is written broadly to also encompass both current federal law, future amendments to both state and federal law, as well as new environmental protection regimes should they be developed. Without limiting this breadth and generality, the Act intends to reach environmental response projects undertaken pursuant to any of the following specific federal statutes:
(1) Subchapter III or IX of the federal "Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976", 42 U.S.C. sec. 6921 to 6939e and 6991 to 6991i, as amended;
(2) Section 7002 or 7003 of the federal "Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976", 42 U.S.C. sec. 6972 and 6973, as amended;
(3) The federal
"Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
of 1980", 42 U.S.C. sec. 9601 to 9647, as amended;
(4) The federal
"Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978", 42
U.S.C.sec.7901
et seq., as amended.
;
(5) "Toxic Substances Control Act", 15 U.S.C. 2601 to 2692, as amended;
(6) "Safe Drinking Water Act", 42 U.S.C. 300f to 300j-26, as amended;
(7) "Atomic Energy Act", 42 U.S.C. 2011 et. sec., as amended.
Subsection (5)(bc) extends the Act's
coverage to voluntary remediation projects that are
undertaken with approval and supervision by a governmental body . Environmental covenants
that are part of voluntary remediation projects may serve both the goal of environmental
protection and the goal of facilitating reuse of the real property. However, supervision of these
projects by a governmental body or other authorized party is essential to insure that the
project
serves these goals are
served. This Act is intended to apply only to environmental covenants that
are part of such publicly supervised remediation projects.
ATo protect against
possible future liability for further remediation, an owner may wish to
provide for remediation of the real property beyond the requirements of minimum applicable
regulatory standards, to protect against possible future
liability for further remediation. Such
provision can be part of the environmental response project if the requirements of governmental
approval and supervision are satisfied.
Some states authorize properly certified private parties to supervise remediaton to
pre-existing standards and certify the cleanup. For example, in Connecticut and Massachusetts,
these
are "licensed site professionals". (Massachusetts: MGL ch. 21A §19; 310 CMR 40.1071;
Connecticut: CGS §§22a-133o, 22a-133y.) Supervision and certification by statutorily -authorized parties
accomplishes the same public function as supervision and certification by the
governmental entity. Thus, these environmental response projects are also covered by this
definition.
SUnder
subsection (5)(bc) also includes within environmental
response projects may include
specific agreements between the owner and the agency for remediation that goes beyond
prevailing requirements. Because the owner may have residual liability for the site, even after
remediation and transfer to a third party for redevelopment, the owner may require further
restrictions as a condition of creating the environmental covenant and eventual reuse of the real
property. The agency's approval and supervision will be sufficient to ensure that any further
restriction is in the public interest.
The definition of "holder" is in Subsection (6). As the practice of using environmental
covenants continues to grow, new entities may emerge to serve as holders, and one purpose of
theis Act isdoes not intend to avoid limiting limit this
process. A holder may be the agency, or a
governmental body, or any non-governmental person under
the broad definition of this Act
although the agency and other governmental bodies indentified in an environmental covenant
may also enforce the covenant in accordance with its terms pursuant to that governmental body's
regulatory authority. The identity of an individual holder must be approved by the agency
and
the owner as part of the process of creating an environmental covenant, as specified in Section
3
of this Act. Section 4(f)4 of this Act. A holder is authorized to
enforce the covenant under
Section 11 and this section also contains an additional provision concerning whether a
holder's
power to enforce the covenant is an interest in real property. A holder may be given other
rights
or obligations in the environmental covenant.
Section
9'sSubsection (9)'s definition of interested party reaches all
owners of less than a
fee simple interest in the real estate. While such parties are frequently described as "holders" of
such an interest, that terminology is not used here to minimize the chance for confusion with the
holder as defined in this act. The definition of interested party reaches a person who holdhas an
interest solely as security for an obligation so that such person's consent will be required for
creation of an environmental covenant under Section 34 and modification under
Section 910 if its
interest is affected by the covenant or modification. This Act does not create the interest held by
any interested party and thus should not effect the liability of any interested party under any other
law.
Subsection (12) defines security instrument broadly. The definition is taken from the Uniform Non-Judicial Foreclosures Act.
Text Moved Here: 6
SECTION 173. SUPPLEMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW
APPLICABLE.
Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this [Act], the principles of law and equity, including the law of real property and environmental and administrative law, supplement the provisions of this [Act].
End Of Moved Text
SECTION 34. CREATIONS.
(a) To be
effective, a An environmental covenant must:
(1) contain a legally sufficient description of the real property subject to the covenant;
(2) describe the activity and use limitations on the real
property, including any rights
of access or other rights granted to a
personor retained in connection with enforcement of the
covenant; and
(3) be signed by:
(A) the
agency;
(B) a holder if other
than the agency; and
(C) each owner and
interested party whose interest in the real property will be
subordinated to the covenant.
(b) The
be signed by the agency, each owner, and the holder.
(b) As a condition to signing an environmental covenant, the
agency may require an
owner of real property
andor any interested party to obtain written subordination of
priorsubordinate its interests in the real property subject to the
covenant. The subordination may
be contained in the environmental covenant or in a separate record or, in the case of an
environmental covenant as a condition to signing the
covenant.
covering real property in a common interest community, in a record signed by the president or other authorized officer of the executive board of the unit owner's association. An agreement by a lender, tenant, or other interested party to subordinate its interest to an environmental covenant does not impose liability on the person with respect to the covenant.
Text Moved Here:
2
Reporter's Notes
End Of Moved Text
Reporter's Notes
This Act does not provide the standards for environmental remediation nor the specific activity and use limitations to be used at a particular site. Those will be provided by other state and federal law governing mandatory and voluntary cleanups. Those standards will then be incorporated into the environmental response project, which, in turn, calls for activity and use restrictions that can be implemented through creation of an environmental covenant. This section addresses creation of the environmental covenants.
An environmental covenant can be created only by agreement between the agency and the
owner or an interested party which owns an interest
which includes the right to create the
covenant. If there is a holder other than the agency, both the agency and
the owner must approve
the identity of the holder, and the holder must agree to the terms of the
covenant. The agency
may refuse to agree to an environmental covenant if it does not effectively implement the
activity and use limitations specified in the environmental response project.
Where no owner is available and willing to participate in the environmental response project, it may be appropriate for the agency to condemn and take an interest sufficient to record a valid servitude on the property where it has the power to do so.
This Act recognizes that there may be parties which own different interests in real
property,
other than the fee simple interest, and these are defined as "interested parties" under Section 2 (9)
of this Act. Examples include an interest in mineral rights may be owned separately from
surface rights, long term leases, mortgages and liens.
Subsection (a)(3)(C) requires that the
interested party which owns such an interest to be affected by the environmental covenant must
agree to the covenant.
Subsection (b)
is concerned with prior interests in the real property. If a prior interest is
not subordinated to the environmental covenant, and then is foreclosed at some later time, under
traditional real property law, that foreclosure would extinguish or limit an environmental
covenant. Since such an outcome is antithetical to the policies underlying this Act, the Act
contemplates that the agency may, before agreeing to the covenant, require subordination of these
interests. At the time of creation of the environmental covenant, the agency must determine
whether the prior interest presents a realistic threat to the covenant's ability to accomplish its
purpose to protect the environment protection and human health.
SECTION 4.
VALIDITY.
(a)
By subordinating its interest, an owner or interested party does not
change its liability
with respect to the property subject to the environmental covenant. Any such liability of a
subordinating party would arise by operation of other law and not under this Act.
SECTION 5. VALIDITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
(a) An environmental covenant runs
with the land and binds the parties to the
covenant
and their successors and assigns.
(b) An environmental covenant that is otherwise valid is valid and enforceable even if: (1) it is not appurtenant to an interest in real property;
(2) it can be or has been assigned to a person other than the original holder;
(3) it is not of a character that has been recognized traditionally at common law;
(4) it imposes a negative burden;
(5) it imposes affirmative obligations upon the owner of an interest in the burdened real property or upon the holder;
(6) the benefit or burden does not touch or concern real
property; or
(7) there is no privity of estate or of contract.;
(c) An environmental covenant is not
invalid or unenforceable because (8) it is
subject to similar impediments to enforcement of that interest under the laws of this state;
or
(9) it is identified as an easement, covenant, servitude, deed restriction, or other interest.
(dc)
A prior covenant is not invalid or unenforceable by reason of any of the common
law limitations on enforcement of interests described in subsection
(b) or because of its
identification as an easement, covenant, servitude, deed restriction or other
instrument. This
[Act] does not apply in any other respect to a prior covenant.
(ed)
This [Act] does not invalidate any interest, whether designated as an environmental
covenant or other interest, that is otherwise enforceable under the law of this State.
(f) A holder of an environmental
covenant may enforce the covenant in accordance with
its terms and may have other rights expressly identified in the covenant. The holder's right to
enforce the covenant is not an interest in real property. This [Act] does not govern whether
other rights held by a holder identified in the covenant are interests in real
property.
Reporter's Notes
Subject to the other
provisions of this Act, environmental covenants are intended to be
perpetual, as provided in subsection (a),. Thus,
cCovenants may be limited, as provided in
Section 89, or
modified or terminanted under Section 910.
Subsection (b) and its comments are modeled on Section 4 of the Uniform Conservation Easement Act. One of the Environmental Covenant Act's basic goals is to remove common law defenses that could impede the use of environmental covenants. This section addresses that goal by comprehensively identifying these defenses and negating their applicability to environmental covenants.
This Act's policy supports the enforceability of environmental covenants by precluding
applicability of doctrines, including older common law doctrines limiting such, that would
limit
enforcement. That policy is broadly consistent with the Restatement of the Law Third of
Property (Servitudes), including §2.6 and chapter 3. For specific doctrines see §§ 2.4 (horizontal
privity), 2.5 (benefitted or burdened estates), 2.6 (benefits in gross and third party benefits), 3.2
(touch and concern doctrine), 3.3 (rule against perpetuities), and 3.5 (indirect restraints on
alienation). .
Subsection (b)(1) provides that an environmental covenant, the benefit of which is held in gross, may be enforced against the grantor or his successors or assigns. By stating that the covenant need not be appurtenant to an interest in real property, it eliminates the requirement in force in some states that the holder of an easement must own an interest in real property (the "dominant estate") benefitted by the easement.
Subsection (b)(2) also clarifies commonexisting law by
providing that a covenant may be
enforced by an assignee of the holder. Section 910(e) of this Act specifies
that assignment to a
new holder will be treated as a modification and Section 910 governs modification of
environmental covenants.
Subsection (b)(3) addresses the problem posed by the commonexisting law's
recognition of
servitudes that served only a limited number of purposes and itsthat law's reluctance to
approve
so-called "novel incidents". This restrictive view might defeat enforcement of covenants serving
the environmental protection ends enumerated in this Act. Accordingly, subsection (b)(3)
establishes that environmental covenants are not unenforceable solely because they do not serve
purposes or fall within the categories of easements traditionally recognized at common
law or
other applicable law.
Subsection (b)(4) deals with a variant of the foregoing problem. The commonSome
applicable law recognizeds only a limited number of
"negative easements" - those preventing the
owner of the burdened real property from performing acts on his real property that he would be
privileged to perform absent the easement. Because a far wider range of negative burdens
than
those recognized at common law might be imposed by environmental
covenants, subsection
(b)(4) modifies the
commonexisting law by eliminating the defense that an
environmental
covenant imposes a "novel' negative burden.
Subsection (b)(5) addresses the opposite problem - the potential unenforceability at
commonunder existing law of an easement that imposes
affirmative obligations upon either the
owner of the burdened real property or upon the holder. NUnder some existing law,
neither of
those interests was viewed by the common
law as a true easement at all. The first, in fact, was
labeled a "spurious" easement because it obligated an owner of the burdened real property to
perform affirmative acts. (The spurious easement was distinguished from an affirmative
easement, illustrated by a right of way, which empowered the easement's holder to perform acts
on the burdened real property that the holder would not have been privileged to perform absent
the easement.)
Achievement of environmental protection goals may require that affirmative obligations be imposed on the burdened real property owner or on the covenant holder or both. For example, the grantor of an environmental covenant may agree to use restrictions and may also agree to undertake affirmative monitoring or maintenance obligations. In addition, the covenant might impose specific engineering or monitoring obligations on the holder, particularly a charitable corporation or trust holder. In either case, the environmental covenant would impose affirmative obligations. Subsection (b)(5) establishes that neither would be unenforceable solely because it is affirmative in nature.
Subsections (b)(6) and (b)(7) preclude the touch and concern and privity of estate or contract defenses, respectively. They have traditionally been asserted as defenses against the enforcement of covenants and equitable servitudes.
Subsection (dc) has further provisions
for covenants created prior to the date of this Act. It
specifies that the common law
defenses covered in subsection (b) will not make prior covenants
unenforceable, and that the identification of a prior
covenant with one name or another will not
make it unenforceable.
Beyond negating these specific defenses, this Act does not apply to prior
covenants. If the parties to a prior covenant wish to have the other benefits of this
Act for that
covenant, they will have to re-execute the covenant in a manner which satisfies the requirements
of this Act.
Section (ed)
disavows the intent to invalidate any interest created either before or after the
Act which does not comply with the Act but which is otherwise valid under the state's law.
Text Was Moved From Here:
1
SECTION 56. OTHER LAW REGULATING USE OF REAL
PROPERTY.
(a) Neither t
This [Act] nordoes
not, and an environmental covenant created pursuant to
this [Act] may not, authorizes a use of real property that is otherwise
prohibited by zoning or
other law.
(b), by
law other than this [Act] regulating use of real property, or by a recorded
covenant, condition or restriction that has priority over the environmental covenant, except as
required by law other than this [Act].
(b) Activity and use limitations in an environmental covenant may
prohibit or restrict
uses of real property
uses that are authorized by zoning or law other than
this [Act]. An activity
and use limitation that is valid when it is created remains valid for the duration of the
environmental covenant notwithstanding changes in zoning or law other than this
[Act]
regulating use of real property.
Subsection (a) clarifies that this Act does not displace other restrictions on land use, including zoning law. Restrictions under that law apply unchanged to real property covered by an environmental covenant. Where other law, including either a state or federal environmental response project, requires structures or activities in order to perform the environmental remediation, the status of those requirements is determined by that other law and not by this Act.
Where the environmental covenant's activity and use limitations prohibit or restrict uses of real property, those prohibitions are necessary to protect human health and the environment. Thus, pursuant to subsection (b), the prohibitions or restrictions in an environmental covenant will apply even if other real property law, including local zoning, would authorize the use. This section provides needed clarity where the environmental covenant is implementing an environmental response project done under state law. Where the environmental covenant is implementing an environmental response project under federal CERLCA law, the federal law authorizing the environmental response project preempts a conflicting city ordinance. U.S. v. City and County of Denver, 100 F.3d 1509 (10th Cir. 1996).
SECTION
67. AGENCY
CONTROLSREQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
COVENANTS.
(a) The agency may require any party to a proposed environmental
covenant to:
(1) provide to the agency
information regarding title to real property that will be
subject to the covenant, as well as information regarding the interested parties and the interests
they own,
(2) provide to the agency
information regarding abutting real property and any other
real property likely to be affected by the contamination remaining on the real property,
and
(3) provide notice of the
proposed covenant in a form and to persons satisfactory to
the agency.
(b) An environmental covenant may
require the owner, any interested party, and their
successors and assigns, to notify promptly the agency, the holder, and the [insert name of state
regulatory agency for environmental protection] if it is not the agency,
of:
(1) an application to a local
government for a building permit or authorization for a
change in real property use; and
(2) a proposal to conduct
new excavation, trenching, installation of wells, use of
ground water, or to undertake other activity which the agency
specifies.
(c) In addition to other rights
described in Unless waived or modified by the agency in a
particular case, after an environmental covenant or otherwise granted by law, the agency, the
[insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] if it is not the agency, and a
holder may enter real property subject to the covenant at reasonable times and with reasonable
advance notice for the purpose of determining compliance with the terms of the covenant.
(d) The agency may require each
party to anis signed, the owner or other person
designated by the agency shall give notice of the environmental covenant to incorporate the terms
of the covenant into any lease, license, or other agreement signed by that party which grants a
right with respect topromptly to the following persons:
(1) all interested parties in the real property subject to the
covenant. The incorporation
may be in full or by reference.;
(e) An environmental covenant is not
invalid or otherwise affected merely because a
person fails to comply with any of the requirements of this section or with the requirements of a
regulation implementing this section.
Text Was Moved From Here:
2
Subsection (a) authorizes the agency to require any
party to an environmental covenant to
furnish the agency with title information as well as the names and addresses of the holders of all
interests of record. It also authorizes the agency to require information on abutting or other
affected property. The subsection also authorizes the agency to require the owner to give notice
of the proposal to create an environmental covenant to all parties it specifies. While this
specification will be within the agency's discretion, notice to at least the following will normally
be appropriate:
1. All2) all
persons in possession of the real property subject to the covenant;
(3) all persons holding an interest of record in theabutting real
property.
Text Was Moved From Here:
3
3. All persons in possession of the real
property.
4. All persons holding an interest of record
in abutting real property and;
(4) all persons holding an interest of record in other real property
likely to be affected by
contamination remaining on the real property subject to the covenant.
5. The [insert name of state regulatory
agency for environmental protection] if it is not the
agency.
6. Any, as
determined by the agency;
(5) any affected local government.
;
and
(6) all persons liable for environmental remediation of the real property subject to the covenant as determined by the agency.
(b) Unless waived or modified by the agency in a particular case, each environmental covenant must require:
(1) a transferee to give notice to the agency, the holder, and the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] of a transfer of any interest in the real property subject to the environmental covenant;
(2) the owner of real property subject to an environmental covenant, or another person identified in the covenant, to submit written reports at specified periods to the agency, the holder and the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] describing the status of compliance with the covenant;
(3) rights of access to the property subject to the environmental covenant to be afforded to the agency and the [insert name of state agency for environmental protection], in addition to access authorized by law other than this [Act], and to the holder or any other persons specified in the covenant; and
(4) the owner to give notice to the agency, the holder, and the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] of any:
(A) application to a local government for a building permit or authorization for a change in use of the real property; and
(B) proposal to conduct new excavation, trenching, installation of wells, or use of ground water, or to undertake additional activity specified in the environmental covenant.
(c) In addition to the requirements under subsection (b), each environmental covenant must contain whatever other information, restrictions, and requirements the agency determines to be necessary and appropriate.
(d) If notice is required under subsection (b)(4)(A) or (B) and the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] determines that issuance of the building permit or approval of the new land use or other activity described in the notice will violate the covenant, the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] shall so notify the applicant or the person proposing the use or activity.
(e) Unless waived or modified by the agency, the owner or other person designated by the agency shall provide to the agency:
(1) any information related to the title to the real property covered by the environmental covenant specified by the agency;
(2) the name and current mailing address of interested parties in the real property covered by the environmental covenant and the nature of the interest of each; and
(3) the name and current mailing address of the other parties specified in subsection (a).
(f) An environmental covenant is not invalid or otherwise affected merely because a person fails to comply with any of the requirements of this section.
Reporter's Notes
Subsection (a) mandates notice of a proposed environmental covenant unless the agency determines otherwise.
Subsection (b) authorizes the agency to
requiremandates inclusion of a number of specific
requirements in an environmental covenant unless the agency determines otherwise.
Subsection (b)(1) concerns notice of a transfer of an interest in the real
property subject to an
environmental covenant. This notice will facilitate
enforcement of the covenant. However, not
all transfers of interests in the real property will implicate enforcement of the covenant and, for
those that do not, the agency need not require notification. Similarly, subsection (b) also
authorizes the agency to requireSubsection (b)(4) concerns a
covenant's requirement of notice of
an application for a building permit
or, change of use of the real property subject to an
environmental covenant. Here again, such a notice will
facilitate enforcement of the covenant
when it is required, although it may not be needed for every, or for
other specified activities.
Where the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection]
determines
that a proposed building permit or land
use, change. In
both situations, the agency may specify
when notice is required.
Subsection (d) authorizes the agency to
require incorporation of the terms of of use of the real
property, or other activity notified under subsection (b)(4) would violate the
environmental
covenant in any instrument granting an interest in the
real property. Such incorporation should
be required in most substantial conveyances to ensure effective enforcement of the covenant,
although it will likely not be needed in all instruments.
[SECTION 7. RECORDING. Alternative
A.
(a) An environmental covenant is
effective only if the covenant, or a notice of the
covenant that complies with the notice provisions specified in Section 13, is recorded in the land
records for every [county] in which land subject to, subsection (c)
requires that it so notify the
applicant or person proposing the activity.
Subsection (e) authorizes the [insert name of state regulatory agency for
environmental
protection] to require specified information as a condition to signing the environmental
covenant
in located. A.
Alternative A.
[SECTION 8. RECORDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in section 9(b), an environmental
covenant, or any
modification or termination of a covenant is effective
only if it, or a notice of it that complies
with the notice provisions specified in Section 13, is recorded in the land records for every
[county] in which land subject toan environmental covenant, is
subject to the laws of this state
governing recording and priority of interests in real property. A notice of the
environmental
covenant is located. This section shall not apply to the
parties to the covenant, or, or any notice
of modification or termination of it, or to other
persons having actual notice of the covenant, or
modification or termination of it.
an environmental covenant, that complies with Section 13 may be recorded in the land records in lieu of recording the entire environmental covenant, modification, or termination.
(b) The [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection]
shall
[create and maintain a][maintain its currently existing] registry that
contains all environmental
covenants, and any
modification or termination of those covenants, and any
recorded notices of
covenants. The registry may also contain any other information concerning environmental
covenants and the real property subject to them which the agency considers appropriate. The
registry is a public record for purposes of [insert reference to State Freedom of Information
Act].]
SECTION 7. RECORDING.
Alternative B
AnAlternative B
[SECTION 8. RECORDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
Except as otherwise provided in section 9(b), an environmental covenant,
or any modification
or termination of an environmental covenant, is effective only if the covenant, modification, or
termination is recorded in the land records for each [county] in which land subject to the
environmental covenant in located. This section does not apply to the parties to the covenant,
modification or termination, or to other persons having actual notice of the covenant,
modification or termination.subject to the laws of this state
governing recording and priority of
interests in real property.]
Reporter's Notes
Section 78
is offered in two versions. Alternative A is to be used in jurisdictions that will
require creation or maintenance of aan existing registry of
environmental covenants at the [insert
name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection]. This alternative authorizes either
the environmental covenant or a notice of the covenant to be recorded in the land records.
Alternative B is to be used in jurisdictions that do not require creation of a registry of
environmental covenants. In those jurisdictions, the environmental covenant should be recorded
in the land records and this Act's provisions on notice in Sections 13 and
14Section13 should not
be used.
Subsection (a) requires that either a notice
ofprovides that environmental covenants are
subject to existing state law on recording and priority of interests in real property. Either
the
environmental covenant or the complete covenant must
be recorded in the land records to alert all
interested parties to the existencea notice of the
covenant may be recorded. While a standard
form of the notice is not required, Official Form 1 is adopted with the text of this Act for use by
those parties who wish to use it. Section 13 provides that use of this Form will comply with the
Act's notice requirements.
Subsection (b) requires creation of a new registry, or maintenance of an existing registry of environmental covenants by the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection]. This registry may be combined with the new state registry of brownfield sites specified in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act §128(b)(1)(C), Pub. L. No. 107-118, ** Stat. ** (2002) (HR 2869, 107th Cong. 1st Session), although this [Uniform Environmental Covenants Act] calls for recording more extensive information.
The full environmental covenant must be recorded in the registry in the [insert name of
state
regulatory agency for environmental protection]. In addition, the agency may require recording
of additional information about each covenant and the real property subject to it. The agency
may choose to require a description of the issues presented by the residual contamination that
give rise to an environmental covenant. The description will be much more accessible to non
specialists, including local government and community interests, than the full covenant
. This
description may, at a minimum, identify the constituents of concern that have been left
in the real property, their location, the potential human and environmental exposure pathways
and receptors for those chemicals, and the permissible exposure limits.
Creation or
maintenance of a specialized registry should improve access to this information
by the public, local governments, citizens groups, and environmental interests, as
well as real
property professionals.
This Section requires recording of the entire
covenant, and any modification or termination,
in the land records.]
SECTION 8.
DURATIONsection provides that environmental
covenants are subject to
existing state law on recording and priority of interests in real property.]
SECTION 9. DURATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
(a) An environmental covenant is perpetual unless
limited by its terms to a specific
duration or to the occurrence of a specific event, or terminated pursuant to Section
910.
(b) AExcept as othewise provided in
Section 10(e), an environmental covenant may not
be extinguished, limited, or impaired through issuance of a tax deed, foreclosure of a tax lien,
adverse
possession,or application of the doctrines of adverse
possession, abandonment, waiver,
lack of enforcement, or any
similar common law doctrine, or
the exercise of eminent domain.law.
(c) An environmental covenant may not be extinguished, limited, or impaired by application of [insert reference to state Marketable Title statute].
Reporter's Notes
Subsection (a) is needed to ensure that the environmental covenant's protectionsrestrictions
continue as long as needed. Subsection (b) makes environmental covenants survive later tax
foreclosure sales, and also survive potential common law and statutory
impairments. These
covenants seek to protect human health and the environment as part of the environmental
response project, beyond reflecting the results of private bargaining between contracting private
parties in specific private transactions. To do so, environmental covenants must survive
impairments arising from these sources. However, this subsection does not restrict application of
other environmental and administrative law to judicial supervision of agency conduct.
Where an environmental covenant applies to real property that wouldis otherwise be subject
to one of the doctrines listed in Subsection (b) situations may arise in which the protections of
the
covenant are not needed in the particular circumstance. For example, the relevant transportation
authority might need to place a bridge support on real property
whererights gained by adverse
possession would be limited by the environmental covenant precluded digging, and eminent
domain would not be available to displace the environmental covenant. Similarly, adverse
possession would not be available to perform its remedial function where, again for
example,covenant's restrictions where a house had been
inadvertently placed on real property
subject to an environmental covenant that precluded residential use. In a
cases such as these,
modification of the covenant can be sought pursuant to Section 9 where the environmental
covenant's protections are not needed. Seeking such a modification will ensure that
appropriate
consideration will be given to residual environmental risks.
The basic policy of this Act to ensure that environmental covenants survive impairment is consistent with the broad policy articulated in the Restatement of the Law of Property (Servitudes) Third, §7.9. In general, restrictions in an environmental covenant are state property law interests that are not extinguishable in bankruptcy.
SECTION 9. MODIFICATION OR
TERMINATION.
(a) An environmental covenant may
be modified or terminated by consent of:
(1) all the original parties to
the covenant or their successors or assigns, other than an
original party or a successor or assign that has waived the right to consent, except that consent is
not required by a party whose interest will not be affected by the modification or termination;
and
(2) each current owner or
interested party whose interest will be affected by the
modification or termination.
(b) A proposal to modify or
terminate an environmental covenant must be accompanied
by all information required by the agency.
(c) A party that proposes to modify
or terminate an environmental covenant shall give
notice of the proposal and the information required under subsection (b) to all parties whose
consent is required for the modification or termination and to other persons as required by the
agency.
(d) An environmental covenant may
include provisions governing modification or
termination of the covenant, but such a provision does not relieve any person of its obligations
under this Act.
(e) For purposes of this [Act],
assignment of an environmental covenant to a new holder
is a modification, except for an assignment undertaken pursuant to a government reorganization.
Reporter's
Notes
Where there is a change in either the
current knowledge of remaining contamination or the
current understanding of the environmental risks it presents, the environmental response project
may be changed or new regulatory action may be taken. In either situation, modification of the
environmental covenant to change its activity and use limitations or to terminate the covenant
may
be necessary. A substantial modification or termination will usually be pursuant to either a
change in the underlying environmental response project that lead to creation of the covenant or a
new regulatory action.
Subsection (b) authorizes the agency to
require information to support a request for
modification or termination. The agency may wish to require one or more of the
following:
(1) New information showing
that the risks posed by the residual contamination are
less or greater than originally thought;
(2) Information
demonstrating that the amount of residual contamination has
diminished;
(3) Information
demonstrating that one or more activity limitations or use restrictions
is no longer necessary.
Under subsection (c) the party
requesting modification or termination is required to give
notice of the request to all parties whose consent is required and to other persons the agency
requires. The agency may wish to consider whether the following parties have a sufficient
interest
in a particular proposal to make notice to them advisable:
(1) All affected local
governments;
(2) The [insert name of state
regulatory agency for environmental protection] if it is not
the agency for this environmental response project;
(3) All persons holding an
interest of record in the real property;
(4) All persons known to
have an unrecorded interest in the real property;
(5) All affected persons in
possession of the real property;
(6) All owners of, and all
holders of other interests in, abutting real property and any
other property likely to be affected by the proposed modification;
(7) All persons specifically
designated to have enforcement powers in the covenant;
and
(8) The
public.
Subsection (d) contemplates that the
environmental covenant may impose additional
restrictions on modification or termination beyond those required by this Act. In some
circumstances the owner or another party may have contingent residual liability for further
cleanup of the real property subject to the environmental covenant and may seek further
restrictions in the covenant to protect against this contingent liability.
SECTION 10.
ENFORCEMENT.
(a) This [Act] does not limit the
authority of the agency,[ the insert name of state
regulatory agency for environmental protection,] or any other person to enforce an environmental
response project under other law.
(b) The following persons may
maintain a civil action for injunctive or other equitable
relief against a person alleged to be in violation of an environmental covenant or the reporting
requirements of subsection (d) of this Section:
(1) the agency and any other
party to the covenant;
(2) the [insert name of state
regulatory agency for environmental protection] if it is not
the agency, or another state official authorized by state law to bring an action on behalf of the
[insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection]; (3) a
current or former owner or interested party whose interest in the real property may be affected by
violation of the covenant, or that may be liable under the environmental response
project;
(4) an affected local
government;
(5) a person the
environmental covenant expressly grants power to enforce;
[(c) In addition to the persons listed
in subsection (b), any [person] [person aggrieved by
an alleged breach of an environmental covenant] may maintain a civil action for injunctive or
other equitable relief against a party alleged to be in violation of an environmental covenant or
the
reporting requirements of subsection (d) of this Section. In any such action the court may award
costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney and expert witness fees, to the prevailing or
substantially prevailing party whenever the court determines such an award is appropriate. If an
action is to be brought by such person, the following rules apply:
(1) The person shall notify
the agency, and the [insert name of state regulatory agency
for environmental protection] if it is not the agency, that it intends to institute an action 120 days
before commencing an action.
(2) The agency may bring an
action to enforce the covenant.
(3) If the agency does not
commence an action within 60 days after the notice was sent,
the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection], if it is not the agency,
may bring the action within the next 60 days.
(4) If either the agency or the
[insert name of state regulatory agency for
environmental protection] brings an action within the periods specified in paragraphs (2) and (3),
the person giving the notice is precluded from bringing its own action so long as the agency or
the
[insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] is diligently prosecuting
enforcement of the covenant.]
(d) An owner of real property subject
to an environmental covenant, or another person
identified in the covenant, shall submit a written report to the agency each calendar year
describing the status of compliance with the covenant. This requirement does not apply to an
owner of detached, owner-occupied residential property.
[(e) The agency shall inspect the real
property subject to an environmental covenant as
often as necessary, and at least once every five years, to ensure compliance with the
covenant.]
Reporter's
Notes
Subsection (a) recognizes that in many
situations the statutes authorizing an environmental
response project will provide substantial authority for governmental enforcement of an
environmental covenant.
Environmental law frequently authorizes
third party enforcement of environmental statutes,
regulations, and permits. Federal law authorizes citizen suits by "any person" against "any
person
alleged to be in violation" of any "regulation. . . requirement. . . or order" under CERCLA and
RCRA remediation projects. 42 U.S.C.A. §§6972 (a) and 9659 (2001). Where the environmental
covenant is part of an environmental response project undertaken pursuant to one of these
statutes,
it is presumably such a "requirement. . .or order" and should be enforceable by "any person." In
addition, approximately 15 states authorize some form of citizen's suits, although the specific
provisions are quite varied. Selmi & Manaster, State Environmental Laws §16.52 (Clark
Boardman, 2002 Supp.). Where state law so authorizes, a citizen suit would be available to
enforce an environmental covenant that is established pursuant to a state law authorized
environmental response project. This Act can not limit existing federal law and does not limit
existing state law authorizing that enforcement
[Subsection (c) offers two alternatives for
citizen suit enforcement of all environmental
covenants and the reporting requirements of subsection (d), in addition to citizen's suits
authorized under existing law. Either alternative would apply to covenants established under
state law in states that do not currently authorize such enforcement. Local citizen and
environmental interests have both the opportunity and the motivation to observe compliance with
use restrictions, and to some degree with activity limitations. Thus they will be well positioned
to
seek enforcement of violations and thereby offer greater assurance of effective implementation of
the covenant. This section authorizes the court to award litigation costs, including attorney and
expert witness fees, to a substantially prevailing party authorized by this subsection to bring a
suit.
This provision is based on analogous federal law authorizing citizen's suits. See, e.g., 42
U.S.C.A. §9659 (f).
The first alternative authorizes suit by any
person, mirroring the provisions of federal law
discussed above. The second alternative is more limited, authorizing suit by any person
aggrieved
by the alleged breach of the environmental covenant. "Person (or party) aggrieved" is used in
both federal and state administrative law. The federal courts, and some state courts, apply a two
part test in determining who is a "person aggrieved", asking first if the person has suffered an
injury in fact, and second, if the person is arguably within the zone of interests sought to be
protected by the statute. See, e.g., National Credit Union Administration v. First Nat'l Bank and
Trust Co., 522 U.S. 479 (1998). The Model State Administrative Procedure Act, §5-106(a)(5)
uses a three part analysis: (i) has the agency action prejudiced the person, (ii) was the agency
required to consider the person's interests in taking the challenged action, and (iii)will a judgment
in favor of the person substantially eliminate or redress the harm.
Subsection (c) also establishes enforcement
priority for such citizen suits. The agency has the
first opportunity. If the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] is
not the agency which approved the environmental covenant, it has the second opportunity. If
either of these brings an action within its specified 60 day time period, that precludes a citizen
suit
to enforce the covenant so long as the action is being diligently prosecuted. This provision is
based on the citizen's suit provisions common in many federal environmental regulatory
statutes.]
The five year reporting period of subsection
(e) mirrors the review requirements for an
environmental cleanup remedy that does not provide for unrestricted use under the federal
superfund program
SECTION 11. COORDINATION BY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
(a) The agency
shall send a copy of an environmental covenant and any modification or
termination thereof to the affected local government at the time the covenant, modification or
termination is recorded.
[(b) The agency may evaluate
whether an application for a building permit or new land
use on real property subject to an environmental covenant is consistent with the covenant. If the
agency determines that issuance of the building permit or approval of the new land use will
violate the covenant, the agency shall so notify the affected local government. The agency's
determination is binding on the affected local government.]
Text Was Moved From Here:
4
Effective implementation of
environmental covenants will require cooperation between
the agency and the affected local government which has jurisdiction over building permits and
local land use decisions. Section 5 of this Act provides that an environmental covenant cannot
authorize a land use that is prohibited by local law, and that an environmental covenant may
restrict a land use that is authorized by local law. In subsection (a) this Section requires the
agency to notify all affected local governments of the creation, modification or termination of an
environmental covenant. Section 6 (b) authorizes an environmental covenant to require notice of
applications for building permits or land use changes to be given to the agency. In this way, both
the affected local government and the agency will have the information needed to coordinate
their
efforts and each avoid action which conflicts with action by the other.
[Where the agency determines that a
building permit or land use change will violate the
covenant, subsection (b) provides that the agency's determination will be binding. Of course, the
agency's determination remains subject to available judicial review under applicable state or
federal administrative law.]
SECTION 12. MARKETABLE
TITLE.
An environmental covenant may not be
extinguished, limited, or impaired by application of
[insert reference to state Marketable Title statute][if notice of the existence of the covenant is
provided to interested persons by any of the following means:
(1)visible evidence of the existence
of the covenant located on any part of the real property
subject to the covenant in the form of a sign, monument or other physical
facility;
(2) a map showing the location of the
real property subject to the covenant that is publicly
displayed in the office of the custodian of the land records of the affected local government or in
the registry maintained by the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental
protection];
(3) the land recording system
maintained by the custodian of the land records of the
affected local government, or by the State, indexes all real property transactions on a universal
parcel numbering system rather than on a system based on grantors and grantees;
(4) the land recording system in
which the environmental covenant is recorded, [or the
registry created pursuant to Section 7(b) of this [Act]] is accessible by electronic means as of the
effective date of this [Act]; or
(5) [insert other means by which
interested persons may secure actual knowledge of the
existence of older environmental covenants.]]
Reporter's
Notes
This States
which do not have a Marketable Record Title Act will not need subsection (c).
States which do have a Marketable Record Title Act may choose to put this exception in that
statute rather than in this Act.
The exception to the state
Marketable Record Title statute in subsection
(c) is analogous to
exceptions commonly made for conservation and preservation servitudes. Restatement of the
Law
of Property Third (Servitudes) § 7.16 (5) (1998). It is based on the public importance of ensuring
continued enforcement of environmental covenants to protect human health and the environment,
as well as the relatively low cost of extending title searches to the registry of environmental
covenants to be kept by the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection]
under Section 7(c) of this
Act.
[ In jurisdictions which index instruments in
the land records by grantor and grantee names,
there is concern that environmental covenants that are older than the statutory period specified in
the Marketable Title Act, typically either 40 or 60 years, may be difficult to find even in the new
registry, and, as a result, may be excluded from coverage under title insurance policies. Thus,
five
means of giving notice of the environmental covenant are specified. Where notice is given by
one
of these means, the Marketable Title Act will not extinguish or impair the environmental
covenant. With environmental covenants created pursuant to the Act, this problem will arise
only
after the statutory period of the Marketable Title Act.]
b) of this Act.
If there is any question whether a specific environmental covenant is exempt from the requirements of the Marketable Title Act, the agency should comply with that Act by re-recording the covenant within the Marketable Title Act's specified statutory period. This will insure that the covenant is not extinguished under the Marketable Title Act.
[SECTION
13. NOTICE.
(a) To be effective, a
notice10. MODIFICATION OR
TERMINATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
(a) An environmental covenant may be modified or terminated by consent of:
(1) the agency;
(2) unless consent was waived, the current owner and any former owner who signed the covenant; and
(3) a party that originally signed the covenant and has a contingent future liability under the environmental response project.
(b) A modification may not change a holder's rights or obligations under an environmental covenant unless the holder consents to the change.
(c) A proposal to modify or terminate an environmental covenant must be accompanied by all information required by the agency.
(d) A party that proposes to modify or terminate an environmental covenant shall give notice of the proposal and provide the information required under subsection (c) to all parties whose consent is required for the modification or termination and to other persons as required by the agency.
(e) An environmental covenant may be modified or extinguished by the exercise of eminent domain or by application of the doctrine of changed circumstances only with the approval of the agency after notice and opportunity for hearing.
(f) An environmental covenant may include an additional limitation on modification or termination of the covenant if the limitation does not conflict with the requirements of this [Act].
(g) Except for an assignment undertaken pursuant to a government
reorganization,
assignment of an environmental covenant must
contain the following information:
(1) a legally sufficient
descriptionto a new holder is a modification.
Reporter's Notes
Where there is a change in either the current knowledge of remaining contamination or the current understanding of the environmental risks it presents, the environmental response project may be changed or new regulatory action may be taken. In either situation, modification of the environmental covenant to change its activity and use limitations or to terminate the covenant may be necessary. A substantial modification or termination will usually be pursuant to either a change in the underlying environmental response project that lead to creation of the covenant or a new regulatory action.
Subsection (a) specifies the parties which must consent to the modification. Subsection (a)(3) reaches a party which originally signed the covenant even though it was not an owner of the real property. Such parties might typically be ones which were liable for some or all of the environmental remediation specified in the environmental response project. This provision is intended to apply to successors in interest to the party which originally signed the covenant where the successor continues to be subject to the contingent liability under the environmental response project.
Subsection (c) authorizes the agency to require information to support a request for modification or termination. The agency may wish to require one or more of the following:
(1) New information showing that the risks posed by the residual contamination are less or greater than originally thought;
(2) Information demonstrating that the amount of residual contamination has diminished;
(3) Information demonstrating that one or more activity limitations or use restrictions is no longer necessary.
Under subsection (d) the party requesting modification or termination is required to give notice of the request to all parties whose consent is required and to other persons the agency requires. The agency may wish to consider whether the following parties have a sufficient interest in a particular proposal to make notice to them advisable:
(1) All affected local governments;
(2) The [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] if it is not the agency for this environmental response project;
(3) All persons holding an interest of record in the real property;
Text Moved Here: 3
2.
(4) All persons known to have an unrecorded interest in the real property.;
End Of Moved Text
(5) All affected persons in possession of the real
property,;
(6) All owners of, and all holders of other interests in, abutting real property and any other property likely to be affected by the proposed modification;
(7) All persons specifically designated to have enforcement powers in the covenant; and
(8) The public.
Subsection (e) provides that the agency's approval is required to modify or terminate an environmental covenant by either an exercise of eminent domain or a judicial application of the doctrine of changed circumstances. An exercise of eminent domain or a judicial application of the doctrine of changed circumstances may result in a change of use for real estate. Requiring the agency's approval for either of these to modify or terminate the covenant will ensure that the agency will determine whether the covenant's activity and use limitations or other restrictions are needed to protect public health and the environment. The Subsection's requirement of notice and opportunity for a hearing anticipates that the process for the Agency's grant or denial of approval will be in a contested administrative or judicial case.
Subsection (f) contemplates that the environmental covenant may impose additional restrictions on modification or termination beyond those required by this Act. In some circumstances the owner or another party may have contingent residual liability for further cleanup of the real property subject to the environmental covenant and may seek further restrictions in the covenant to protect against this contingent liability.
SECTION 11. ENFORCEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
(a) Any of the following persons may maintain a civil action for injunctive or other equitable relief for violations of an environmental covenant:
(1) the agency and any other party to the covenant;
(2) if it is not the agency, the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental protection] (3) a current or former owner or interested party whose interest in the real property may be affected by violation of the covenant, or that may be liable under the environmental response project;
(4) an affected local government;
(5) a person authorized to enforce the environmental covenant by law other than this [Act]; and
(6) any person named as a holder in the environmental covenant; and
(7) any other person to which the environmental covenant expressly grants power to enforce.
(b) This [Act] does not limit the authority of the agency, or any other person to enforce an environmental response project under law other than this [Act].
(c) The rights of an agency or other governmental body named in an environmental covenant to enforce the covenant are based on the agency's or governmental authority's regulatory power and are not an interest in the real property subject to an environmental covenant, unless the agency or other governmental body determine otherwise at the time of creation of the covenant or the covenant otherwise provides.
(d) The enforcement rights of a holder or other nongovernmental person to which the environmental covenant expressly grants power to enforce an environmental covenant are not an owner's interest in the real property subject to an environmental covenant. Whether other rights granted to or exercised by a holder with respect to the real property subject to an environmental covenant constitute an owner's interest in the real property is not governed by this [Act].
(e) A party is not subject to liability solely as a result of having the right to enforce an environmental covenant.
(f) The agency shall inspect the real property subject to an environmental covenant as often as necessary, and at least once every [five] years, to ensure compliance with the covenant.
Reporter's Notes Subsection (a) specifies which persons may bring an action to enforce an environmental covenant.
Subsection (b) recognizes that in many situations the statutes authorizing an environmental response project will provide substantial authority for governmental enforcement of an environmental covenant.
Text Moved Here: 1
Subsections (fc) provides that a holder'sand (d)
specify when the right to enforce an
environmental covenant is not an interest in real property. ThisThese provision iss are included
for two reasons. First, some environmental enforcement agencies are not authorized to own an
interest in real property and this provision will enable those agencies to serve as a holderhave
enforcement rights under the Act.
Second, the nature of the holder's or other person's interest in the real property may influence whether its rights and duties with respect to the real property are likely to lead to potential liability for future environmental remediation, should such remediation become necessary. Under CERCLA an "owner" is liable for remediation costs, 42 U.S.C.A. 9607(a)(1). Unfortunately, the definition of "owner" in the statute is circular and unhelpful in evaluating whether a holder is potentially liable under it. 42 U.S.C.A. 9601(20).
In general, a holder
'sthe right to enforce the covenant should be considered
comparable to the
rights covered in an easement and, thus, should not lead to CERCLA liability. The two cases
that
have considered this question have found that the parties which held the easements were not
CERCLA "owners". Long Beach Unified School District v. Dorothy B. Godwin California
Living
Trust, 32 F.3d 1364 (9th Cir. 1994); Grand Trunk R.R. v. Acme Belt
Recoating, 859 F. Supp. 1125
(W.D.MI, 1994). In each case, the court reasoned that the circular definition of owner meant
that
the term's most common meaning would prevail. The common law's distinction between an
easement holder and the property owner was then applied to find the easement holder not to be
an
"owner" for purposes of this statute.
Where the holder or another person has more extensive rights, a careful analysis will be required. The cases typically emphasize that parties who exercise the degree of control over a site equivalent to the control typically exercised by an owner of the site will be held liable as an "owner". Under this approach, for example, lessees have been held liable as owners when their control over the site approximated that which an owner would have. See, e.g., Delaney v. Town of Carmel, 55 F. Supp. 2d 237 (S.D.N.Y. 1999); U.S. v. A & N Cleaners and Launderers, 788 F. Supp. 1317 (S.D.N.Y. 1990); U.S. v. S.C. Dept. of Health and Env. Control, 653 F. Supp. 984 (D.C.S.C. 1984.)
CERCLA liability also extends to an "operator" of the site (42 U.S.C.A. 9607(a)(1)), and the case law interpreting this definition emphasizes that a party is liable as an operator if it has a high degree of control over the operating decisions and day to day management at the site. A holder will, in general, have only control authority over the site related to effective enforcement of the environmental covenant and does not typically need more extensive day to day control. A holder should be given more extensive control over the site only after careful consideration of the potential CERCLA liability.
End Of Moved Text
SECTION 12. COPIES TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
The owner or other party designated by the agency shall send a copy of an environmental covenant and any modification or termination of the covenant to the affected local government within [ ] days after the covenant, modification, or termination is signed.
Text Moved Here: 4
End Of Moved Text
Effective implementation of environmental covenants will require cooperation between the agency and the affected local government which has jurisdiction over building permits and local land use decisions. Section 6 of this Act provides that an environmental covenant cannot authorize a land use that is prohibited by local law, and that an environmental covenant may restrict a land use that is authorized by local law. This Section requires the agency to notify all affected local governments of the creation, modification or termination of an environmental covenant.
SECTION 13. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT.
(a) A notice of an environmental covenant, and a notice of modification or termination of an environmental covenant, must contain:
(1) a legally sufficient description and any available street address of the real property;
(2) the name and address of:
(A) the owner of the real property;
(B) the agency and the holder, if other than the agency; and
(C) any other person identified in the
covenant that,
modification, or termination
which is specifically authorized to enforce the covenant;
(3) a statement that:
(A) the covenant, modification, or termination imposes
significant restrictions and
obligations with regard to permissible activities on and uses of the real property; and
(B) the restrictions
and obligations [are likely to] affect all persons having an
interest in the real property.
(4) a statement that the following areenvironmental
covenant, modification, or
termination as executed is available in a registry at the [insert name and address of state
regulatory
agency for environmental protection] , disclosing the method of any electronic access:
(A) the environmental
covenant as executed; and
(B) any other
information required by the Agency; and
(5) a statement that the Nnotice is filed pursuant to
this [Act].
(b) A notice is sufficient if it is in the
form of Official Form set forth in Section 14. (b) A
statement in substantially the following form, executed with the same formalities as a
deed in this state, satisfies the requirements of this Section:
Text Moved Here: 5
[Insert names and addresses of any parties authorized to enforce the covenant].
Reporter's Notes
A description of the property under subsection (a)(1) may include identification by latitude/longitude coordinates.
This section and the following one
should be used only by states that require creation of a
registry of environmental covenants pursuant to Section 7(b) of this Act. The notice specified in
this Section may be recorded in the land records in lieu of recording the environmental covenant.
However, such a notice should only be authorized if the registry is established and the
environmental covenant is recorded there. Where there is no separate registry, then the
environmental covenant should be recorded in the land records and this notice should not be
used.]
[SECTION 14.
OFFICIAL FORM : NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
COVENANT.
A statement in substantially the following
form, executed with the same formalities as a deed
in this State, satisfies the requirements of Section 13.
OFFICIAL FORM : NOTICE
OF ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT
1. This notice is filed on the land records of the
[city/town/county] of [insert name of jurisdiction
in which the real property is located] pursuant to Sections 7 and 13 of the Uniform
Environmental Covenants [Act]. The [Act] has been codified in this State at [insert statutory
reference].
2. This notice and the covenant to which it
refers impose significant legal restrictions and
obligations with respect to the future use of and activities on the property described below.
Those restrictions and obligations are likely to affect all persons having an interest in that
property.
3. A legally sufficient description of the
property is attached as Exhibit A to this notice. The
address, if available, of the property which is subject to the environmental covenant is [insert
address of property].
4. The owner of the real property on the date of
this notice is [insert name of current legal owner
of the Property]. The address of the owner is [insert the owner's current address as shown on
the tax records of the jurisdiction in which the Property is located].
5. The other parties to the covenant and their
addresses are:
Text Was Moved From Here:
5
[Insert names and addresses of any third party
beneficiaries].
6. The environmental covenant regarding the
real property was signed by all the parties on [insert
date on which the last party signed the covenant]. The covenant becomes effective for all
purposes on the date this notice is recorded on the land records of all jurisdictions in which the
property is located. This notice remains effective for all purposes until a release of this notice
is signed by the then owner of the property and by the agency and
recorded.
7. The full text of the covenant is on file and
available for inspection and copying in the registry
maintained for that purpose by the [insert name of state regulatory agency for environmental
protection] at [insert address and room of building in which the registry is maintained]. [The
covenant may be found electronically at [insert web address for
Covenant]].
Dated at ________, ________ this ____ day of
________, ________.
Witness as to Owner NAME
OF OWNER
______________________________
______________________________
By
______________________________
Witness as to Agency
NAME OF AGENCY
______________________________
______________________________
By
______________________________
Witness as to Other Parties NAME
OF OTHER PARTIES
______________________________
______________________________
By
______________________________
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
[INSERT STANDARD FORM OF
ACKNOWLEDGMENT IN STATE]
[ATTACH PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS
EXHIBIT A]]
SECTION 15. REGULATIONS
The [director of the state regulatory agency for environmental protection] shall have the
power tomay formulate, adopt, amend, and
repeal [rules][regulations] consistent with this [Act]
and necessary to implement this
[Act].
This Act authorizes adoption of rules or regulations needed to implement the
Act. In some
states, such authority may already exist in a generic environmental law statute and this section
will
not be needed. The Act does not address the procedural requirements for this adoptionadopting
regulations, nor the standards for judicial review of the administrator's exercise of discretion in
adopting regulations, as those will be supplied by other state administrative procedure
law.
The provisions of state law governing management of records also apply to actions taken pursuant to this Section.
SECTION 165. UNIFORMITY OF APPLICATION AND
CONSTRUCTION.
In applying and construing this Uniform Act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among States that enact it.
Text Was Moved From Here:
6
SECTION 186. RELATION TO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND
NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT.
This
[Act] modifies, limits, or supersedes the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and
National Commerce Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 7001 et seq., but does not modify, limit, or supersede
Section 101 of that aAct (15 U.S.C. Section
7001(a)) or authorize electronic delivery of any of the
notices described in Section 103 of that Act.
This is a provision suggested for inclusion in uniform acts. It responds to the specific language of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and is designed to avoid preemption of state law under that federal legislation. This proposed section was created by the Standby Committee for the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act for this purpose. The Executive Committee of the National Conference has reviewed and approved this language.
SECTION 17. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this [Act] or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this [Act] which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this [Act] are severable.