Back | Word Version | ASCII Version | PDF Version


                                                                    D R A F T

 

FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

 

 

 

UNIFORM STATUTORY TRUST ENTITY ACT

 

 

 

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS

 

ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS

 

 

 

 

MEETING IN ITS ONE-HUNDRED-AND-SEVENTEENTH YEAR

BIG SKY, MONTANA

JULY 18 - JULY 25, 2008

 

 

UNIFORM STATUTORY TRUST ENTITY ACT

 

 

 

WITH PREFATORY NOTE AND PRELIMINARY COMMENTS

 

Copyright 82008

By

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS

ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS

 

 

 

The ideas and conclusions set forth in this draft, including the proposed statutory language and any comments or reporter=s notes, have not been passed upon by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws or the Drafting Committee.  They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Conference and its Commissioners and the Drafting Committee and its Members and Reporter.  Proposed statutory language may not be used to ascertain the intent or meaning of any promulgated final statutory proposal.

 

 

 


DRAFTING COMMITTEE ON UNIFORM STATUTORY TRUST ENTITY ACT

The Committee appointed by and representing the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in preparing this Act consists of the following individuals:

JUSTIN L. VIGDOR, 2400 Chase Square, Rochester, NY 14604, Chair 

THOMAS J. BUITEWEG, 200 Renaissance Ct., Mail Code 482-B09-B11, P.O. Box 200, Detroit, MI 48265-2000

ANN E. CONAWAY, Widener University School of Law, 4601 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19803

LANI LIU EWART, 1099 Alakea St., Suite 1800, Honolulu, HI 96813

THOMAS L. JONES, University of Alabama School of Law, P.O. Box 865557, Tuscaloosa, AL 35486‑0050

DIMITRI G. KARCAZES, 55 E. Monroe St., Suite 3300, Chicago, IL 60603

JOHN H. LANGBEIN, Yale Law School, P.O. Box 208215, New Haven, CT 06520-8215

L. GENE LEMON, 1136 W. Butler Dr., Phoenix, AZ 85021‑4428

HARRY M. WALSH, 456 Summit Ave. #206, St. Paul, MN 55102

ROBERT H. SITKOFF, Harvard Law School, 1575 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, Reporter

 

EX OFFICIO

MARTHA LEE WALTERS, Oregon Supreme Court, 1163 State St., Salem, OR 97301-2563, President

ANNE L. MCGIHON, 837 Sherman St., Denver, CO 80203, Division Chair

 

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADVISOR

ELLISA OPSTBAUM HABBART, 300 Martin Luther King Blvd., Suite 200, Wilmington, DE 19801, ABA Advisor

WILLIAM H. CLARK, JR., One Logan Square, 18th and Cherry Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19103-6996, ABA Section Advisor

THOMAS E. RUTLEDGE, 2000 PNC Plaza, 500 W. Jefferson St., Louisville, KY 40202-2874, ABA Section Advisor

 

                                                        EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

JOHN A. SEBERT, 111 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 1010, Chicago, IL 60602, Executive Director

 

 

                                               Copies of this Act may be obtained from:

 

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS

ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS

                                                     111 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 1010

                                                            Chicago, Illinois  60602

312/450-6600

www.nccusl.org


UNIFORM STATUTORY TRUST ENTITY ACT

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Prefatory Note. 1

 

[ARTICLE] 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

SECTION 101.  SHORT TITLE. 5

SECTION 102.  DEFINITIONS. 6

SECTION 103.  DEFAULT AND MANDATORY RULES. 9

SECTION 104.  SCOPE OF GOVERNING INSTRUMENT. 13

SECTION 105.  APPLICABILITY OF TRUST LAW... 16

SECTION 106.  RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.. 17

 

[ARTICLE] 2

FORMATION; CERTIFICATE OF TRUST AND OTHER FILINGS; PROCESS

SECTION 201.  CERTIFICATE OF TRUST. 18

SECTION 202.  AMENDMENT OR RESTATEMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF TRUST. 19

SECTION 203.  SIGNING OF RECORDS. 20

SECTION 204.  DELIVERY TO AND FILING OF RECORDS BY [SECRETARY OF STATE]; EFFECTIVE TIME AND DATE. 20

SECTION 205.  CORRECTING FILED RECORD.. 22

SECTION 206.  CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING.. 23

SECTION 207.  NAME OF STATUTORY TRUST. 25

SECTION 208.  RESERVATION OF NAME. 26

SECTION 209.  AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS. 28

SECTION 210.  CHANGE OF DESIGNATED OFFICE OR AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS  29

SECTION 211.  RESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS. 30

SECTION 212.  SERVICE OF PROCESS. 31

SECTION 213.  ANNUAL REPORT FOR [SECRETARY OF STATE]. 32

 

[ARTICLE] 3

AUTHORIZATION; GOVERNING LAW; DURATION; POWERS

SECTION 301.  STATUTORY TRUST AUTHORIZED.. 34

SECTION 302.  PERMISSIBLE PURPOSES. 34

SECTION 303.  STATUTORY TRUST SOLELY LIABLE FOR DEBTS,
OBLIGATIONS, AND OTHER LIABILITIES OF STATUTORY TRUST. 36

SECTION 304.  RIGHTS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER AND TRUSTEE IN TRUST PROPERTY. 37

SECTION 305.  GOVERNING LAW... 38

SECTION 306.  DURATION.. 39

SECTION 307.  POWER TO HOLD PROPERTY; TITLE TO TRUST PROPERTY.. 40

SECTION 308.  POWER TO SUE AND BE SUED.. 41

 

[ARTICLE 4]

SERIES TRUSTS

SECTION 401.  SERIES OF STATUTORY TRUST. 42

SECTION 402.  LIABILITY OF SERIES. 42

SECTION 403.  GOVERNANCE OF SERIES. 44

SECTION 404.  SEPARATE PURPOSE OF SERIES. 44

SECTION 405.  SERIES TRUST AS INVESTMENT COMPANY.. 45

SECTION 406.  DISSOLUTION OF SERIES. 45

 

[ARTICLE 5]

TRUSTEES AND TRUST MANAGEMENT

SECTION 501.  MANAGEMENT OF STATUTORY TRUST. 47

SECTION 502.  TRUSTEE POWERS. 47

SECTION 503.  ACTION BY TRUSTEES. 48

SECTION 504.  PROTECTION OF PERSON DEALING WITH TRUSTEE. 49

SECTION 505.  STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR TRUSTEES. 50

SECTION 506.  GOOD-FAITH RELIANCE. 51

SECTION 507.  INTERESTED TRANSACTIONS. 52

SECTION 508.  TRUSTEE’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION.. 53

SECTION 509.  INDEMNIFICATION, ADVANCEMENT, AND EXONERATION.. 53

SECTION 510.  DIRECTION OF TRUSTEES. 55

SECTION 511.  DELEGATION BY TRUSTEE. 56

SECTION 512.  INDEPENDENT TRUSTEE IN REGISTERED INVESTMENT
COMPANY.. 58

 

[ARTICLE] 6

BENEFICIARIES AND BENEFICIAL RIGHTS

SECTION 601.  BENEFICIAL INTEREST. 60

SECTION 602.  VOTING OR CONSENT BY BENEFICIAL OWNERS. 60

SECTION 603.  CONTRIBUTION BY BENEFICIAL OWNER.. 61

SECTION 604.  DISTRIBUTION TO BENEFICIAL OWNER.. 63

SECTION 605.  REDEMPTION OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST. 64

SECTION 606.  CHARGING ORDER.. 64

SECTION 607.  TRANSACTION WITH BENEFICIAL OWNER.. 66

SECTION 608.  BENEFICIAL OWNER’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION.. 66

SECTION 609.  ACTION BY BENEFICIAL OWNER.. 67

[ARTICLE] 7

CONVERSION AND MERGER

SECTION 701.  DEFINITIONS. 70

SECTION 702.  CONVERSION. 71

SECTION 703.  ACTION ON PLAN OF CONVERSION BY CONVERTING
STATUTORY TRUST. 72

SECTION 704.  FILINGS REQUIRED FOR CONVERSION; EFFECTIVE DATE. 73

SECTION 705.  EFFECT OF CONVERSION. 74

SECTION 706.  MERGER. 76

SECTION 707.  ACTION ON PLAN OF MERGER BY CONSTITUENT STATUTORY TRUST. 77

SECTION 708.  FILINGS REQUIRED FOR MERGER; EFFECTIVE DATE. 78

SECTION 709.  EFFECT OF MERGER. 79

SECTION 710.  [ARTICLE] NOT EXCLUSIVE. 81

 

[ARTICLE] 8

DISSOLUTION AND WINDING UP

SECTION 801.  EVENTS CAUSING DISSOLUTION.. 82

SECTION 802.  WINDING UP. 82

SECTION 803.  KNOWN CLAIMS AGAINST DISSOLVED STATUTORY TRUST. 83

SECTION 804.  OTHER CLAIMS AGAINST DISSOLVED STATUTORY TRUST. 85

SECTION 805.  ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION.. 86

SECTION 806.  REINSTATEMENT FOLLOWING ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION.. 87

SECTION 807.  APPEAL FROM REJECTION OF REINSTATEMENT. 88

SECTION 808.  DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS IN WINDING UP STATUTORY
TRUST’S ACTIVITIES. 89

 

[ARTICLE] 9

FOREIGN STATUTORY TRUSTS

 

[ARTICLE] 10

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SECTION 1001.  UNIFORMITY OF APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION.. 91

SECTION 1002.  RELATION TO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT. 91

SECTION 1003.  SAVING CLAUSE. 91

SECTION 1004.  RESERVATION OF POWER TO AMEND OR REPEAL. 92

SECTION 1005.  APPLICATION TO EXISTING RELATIONSHIPS. 92

SECTION 1006.  REPEALS. 93

SECTION 1007.  EFFECTIVE DATE. 94

 


UNIFORM STATUTORY TRUST ENTITY ACT

Prefatory Note

            Introduction.  In large part because of uncertainty over the legal status of the business trust at common law, use of the common-law trust as a mode of business organization declined over the course of the twentieth century.  Today, most commercial enterprise that is not organized as a sole proprietorship make use of the partnership, limited liability company, or a corporate form of organization. 

 

            To address legal uncertainty over the common law business trust, at least thirty states have enacted legislation that validates the trust as a permissible form of business organization.  See Robert H. Sitkoff, The Rise of the Statutory Business Trust [citation] (collecting state statutes).  But the entity that arises under the more recent of these statutes is better understood as a “statutory business trust,” “statutory trust entity,” or “statutory trust” than as a common law business trust with statutory validation.  See the Comment to Section 101.    

 

            A statutory trust differs from a common-law trust in several important respects.  A common-law trust, whether its purpose is donative or commercial, arises from private action without the involvement of a public official.  See Uniform Trust Code §401 (2000); Restatement (Third) of Trusts §10 (2003).  Because a common-law trust is not a juridical entity, it must sue, be sued, and transact in the name of the trustee in the trustee’s capacity as such.  By contrast, a statutory trust is formed by delivering a certificate of trust to a public official, typically the Secretary of State, for filing in the public record.  See Section 201.  Moreover, a statutory trust is a juridical entity, separate from its trustees and beneficial owners, that has capacity to sue, be sued, and transact in its own name.  See Sections 301, 307-308.

 

            Existing state business trust statutes do not prohibit use of the common-law trust for a commercial purpose.  Instead, the modern statutes offer transactional planners an additional option, a statutory trust, which is governed by the state’s statutory trust act.  Common-law trusts, whether donative or commercial, remain subject to the principles of law and equity applicable to private and charitable trusts. 

 

            Since the 1980s, statutory trust entities have thrived in a variety of niches, particularly in the organization of mutual funds and the practice of asset securitization.  See Sitkoff, supra; Steven L. Schwarcz, Commercial Trusts as Business Organizations: Unraveling the Mystery, 58 Bus. Law. 559 (2003); John H. Langbein, The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce, 107 Yale L.J. 165 (1997); Sheldon A. Jones, Laura M. Moret, & James M. Storey, The Massachusetts Business Trust and Registered Investment Companies, 13 Del. J. Corp. L. 421 (1988).  The statutory trust has also come to be used in various tax-advantaged real estate transactions.  See, e.g., Rev. Rul. 2004-86, 2004-33 IRB 191.

 

            The primary stimulus for the drafting of the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act is the increasing popularity of statutory trust entities, chiefly in the structured finance and mutual fund industries.  Increasing use of statutory trusts as a mode of business organization has led to a recognition that in many states the status of such trusts is unclear and that much of the existing legislation is out of date or incomplete.  Practitioners, entrepreneurs, and scholars struggle to understand the law governing statutory trusts.  The case law on statutory trusts is sparse.

 

            The Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act validates the statutory trust as a permissible form of business organization and brings the disparate and often inadequate existing laws into uniformity.

 

            Models for Drafting.  Although the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act is the first Uniform Act on the subject of statutory business trusts, comprehensive statutory trust regimes exist in several states.  Notable examples include Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Dakota, Wyoming, and Virginia, all of which were consulted in the drafting of the Uniform Act.  However, in drafting the substantive provisions of the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act, the drafting committee was influenced primarily by the Delaware Statutory Trust Act.

 

            In choosing to take the Delaware Statutory Trust Act as its starting point, the drafting committee relied on a recent study that presents state-level data on the aggregate number of statutory trusts and the number of new statutory trust formations over the last several years.  See Sitkoff, supra, at __.  These data indicate that the Delaware Act dominates the field.  Id. at __.  For a general discussion of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, see Wendell Fenton & Eric A. Mazie, Delaware Statutory Trusts, in 2 R. Franklin Balotti & Jesse A. Finkelstein, The Delaware Law of Corporations & Business Organizations ch. 19 (3d ed. 2005 Supp.). 

 

            Section 105 provides that ordinary trust law supplements this Act.  However, several substantive provisions of this Act are drawn from corporate rather than trust law.  See, e.g., Sections 501 (management by or under the authority of the trustees); 505 (standards of conduct of trustees); 507 (interested transactions).  Looking to corporate law on these issues is consistent with the hybrid approach of the Delaware Act and reflects the nature of a statutory trust as a juridical entity.  The Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act is an unincorporated entity statute.

 

            In drafting the public filing and other provisions not unique to the statutory trust form, the drafting committee took the Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001) and the Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) as its starting points.  For guidance on the common law of trusts, the drafting committee took the Uniform Trust Code (2000) as its starting point, referencing also the Second and Third Restatements of Trusts.

 

            Innovative Provisions.  Although much of the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act reflects a reorganization and refinement of provisions found in the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, the Uniform Act contains several innovations including:  (1) specification of rules that are not subject to override in the statutory trust’s governing instrument (§103(c)); (2) exclusion of trusts with a prevailingly donative purpose (§302); (3) clearer guidance on the applicability of ordinary trust law to statutory trust entities (§105); (4) clearer guidance on the relationship between the common-law trust and statutory trust entities (§1005); (5) a charging order provision (§606); (6) systematic treatment of conversion and merger (Article 7), and of dissolution (Article 8); and (7) an entire article on series trusts (Article 4).

 

            Default and Mandatory Rules.  Most of the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act consists of default rules that apply only if the governing instrument does not sufficiently address a particular issue.  Under Section 103(a)-(b), the governing instrument may override a substantial majority of the Act’s provisions.  The exceptions are scheduled in Section 103(c).  Section 104 collects various permissive rules regarding the scope of the governing instrument.

 

            Relationship to Common-law trusts and the Uniform Trust Code.  In the culture of American law the common-law trust is customarily considered to be a vehicle for effecting donative transfers.  Indeed, leading compilations of the common law of trusts tend to exclude business trusts from their coverage.  See e.g., Restatement (Third) of Trusts §1 cmt. b (2003); 1 Austin Wakeman Scott, William F. Fratcher, & Mark L. Ascher, 1 Scott and Ascher on Trusts §2.1.2 (5th ed. 2006); Restatement (Second) of Trusts §1 cmt. b (1959).  The justification stated in the Restatement (Third) of Trusts is representative:  “[T]he business trust is a business arrangement that is best dealt with in connection with business associations.”  Restatement (Third) of Trusts, supra.

 

            There is, however, no separate body of general business law that applies to a common-law trust that has a business purpose.  The common law of trusts applies to all trusts arising under the common law, even those that have a business purpose, to the extent that the common law is not displaced by the trust instrument or specialized legislation.  For this reason, although the Uniform Trust Code “is directed primarily at trusts that arise in an estate planning or other donative context,” the Code applies to trusts that have a business or commercial purpose to the extent that the trust instrument or other legislation do not displace the Code’s provisions.  UTC §102 cmt.

 

            Accordingly, the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act is not a codification of general business law principles applicable to common law business trusts.  Nothing in this Act displaces the common law of trusts, or the Uniform Trust Code, with respect to such trusts.  On the contrary, Section 1005(a) expressly confirms the continued applicability of the state’s laws pertaining to trusts to a common law business trust.

 

            The Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act more closely resembles a generic corporate code or unincorporated entity law than the Uniform Trust Code.  Like a corporation, limited liability company, and limited partnership, but unlike a common-law trust, a statutory trust is a juridical entity that may conduct transactions in its own name separate from that of its fiduciary and its beneficial owners.  See Sections 301, 307-08.  Like those entities, but unlike a common-law trust, a statutory trust is formed by delivering a certificate of trust to a public official for filing.  Compare Section 201 with Uniform Trust Code §401 (2000) and Restatement (Third) of Trusts §10 (2003).  Further, Section 105 provides that ordinary trust law supplements this Act, but only to the extent not modified or displaced by this Act or the governing instrument—and this Act modifies or displaces a host of ordinary trust law principles including those concerning fiduciary standards of conduct (Section 505) and termination of trusts (Section 306).  Section 1005(b) allows an existing common-law trust that does not have a prevailingly donative purpose to convert into a statutory trust by delivering a certificate of trust for filing under Section 201.

 

            Although the drafting committee contemplated that a statutory trust under this Act will be used primarily as a mode of business organization, Section 603(a) confirms that a person may become a beneficial owner of a statutory trust without an exchange of consideration.  It is therefore possible that a statutory trust could be used as a substitute for the common-law trust in noncommercial contexts.  However, to ensure that a statutory trust is not used to evade mandatory rules applicable to common-law trusts that enforce public policy limitations on donative transfers, Section 302 provides that a statutory trust may not have a prevailingly donative purpose.  For discussion of the nonapplicability to a statutory trust of the mandatory rules applicable to common-law trusts (including Uniform Trust Code §105), see the comment to Section 103 under the heading “Relationship to Mandatory Rules Under the Uniform Trust Code” and the comments to Sections 105 and 302.

 

            Citation Convention.  [To come:  A statement here about citation conventions, for example, that state statutory cites are current as of Lexis or Westlaw on X date.]


 


UNIFORM STATUTORY TRUST ENTITY ACT

 

[ARTICLE] 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

            SECTION 101.  SHORT TITLE.  This [act] may be cited as the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act.

Comment

 

            Because this Act provides for the creation and use of a statutory trust as a form of business organization, it might seem that “Uniform Business Trust Act,” “Uniform Statutory Business Trust Act,” or “Uniform Statutory Trust Act” would be a better title.  However, after consultation with experts in the structured finance, bankruptcy, mutual fund, and estate planning industries, the drafting committee rejected those and other such titles in favor of “Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act.”

 

            The drafting committee included the word “entity” in the title for two reasons.  First, the creature of this act is indeed a trust entity.  It has the power to sue, be sued, and transact in its own name.  A common-law trust, by contrast, is not a juridical entity.  Second, the word “entity” in the title differentiates this act from the Uniform Trust Code, which is a codification of the common law of trusts.  However, to conform with prevailing usage under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, the entity that arises under this Act is called a “statutory trust,” not a “statutory trust entity.”  See Section 102(15).  Further, because the drafting committee wanted a statutory trust under this act to receive treatment under applicable regulatory law similar to that of a Delaware statutory trust, the entity features of a statutory trust under this act closely resemble those of a Delaware statutory trust.

 

            The drafting committee had three reasons for eschewing the phrase “business trust.”  First, under this act a statutory trust need not have a business or commercial purpose.  On the contrary, Section 302 confirms that a statutory trust may have any lawful purpose other than a prevailingly donative purpose.

 

            Second, the drafting committee endeavored to avoid any implication on whether a statutory trust would qualify as a “business trust” under the bankruptcy code.  Under the bankruptcy code, the definition of a “debtor” eligible for bankruptcy includes a “person,” 11 U.S.C. §101(13), the definition of “person” includes a “corporation,” id. §101(41), and the definition of “corporation” includes a “business trust.”  Id. §101(9).  Hence, a “business trust” might qualify as an eligible “debtor.”  Bankruptcy eligibility is a significant issue for trusts used as special purpose entities in structured finance transactions, a principal use of the modern statutory trust in practice.  Such trusts are often designed to be “bankruptcy remote.”  Thus, as in the leading case of In re Secured Equipment Trust of Eastern Airlines, Inc., 38 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 1994), in certain configurations trusts used in securitization transactions have indeed been held not to be “business trusts” under the bankruptcy code.  

 

            Third, the drafting committee was influenced by the revealed preference for “statutory trust” over “business trust” among existing users of statutory business trusts as evidenced by the dominant position of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act relative to the statutory or business trust acts of the other states.  See Robert H. Sitkoff, The Rise of the Statutory Business Trust [in progress].  In 2002 Delaware recast the “Delaware Business Trust Act” as the “Delaware Statutory Trust Act,” replacing nearly every reference to “business trust” with “statutory trust.”  See 73 Del. Laws 329 (2002).  The Connecticut statute, which is the second most popular, is likewise cast as a Statutory Trust Act.  See Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §§34-500, 34-501(2).

 

            SECTION 102.  DEFINITIONS.

            (1) “Beneficial owner” means the owner of a beneficial interest in a statutory trust or foreign statutory trust. 

            (2) “Certificate of trust” means the record that has been filed by the Secretary of State under Section 201.  The term includes the record as amended or restated.

            (3) “Common-law trust” means a fiduciary relationship with respect to property arising from a manifestation of intention to create that relationship and subjecting the person that holds title to the property to duties to deal with the property for the benefit of charity or for one or more persons, at least one of which is not the sole trustee, whether or not the purpose of the trust is donative or commercial.  The term includes the type of trust known at common law as a “business trust”, “Massachusetts trust”, or “Massachusetts business trust.” 

            (4) “Designated office” means:

                        (A) for a statutory trust, the mailing address that it is required to designate under Section 201(a)(2); or

                        (B) for a foreign statutory trust, its principal office.

            (5) “Foreign statutory trust” means a trust that is formed under the laws of a jurisdiction other than this state that would be a statutory trust if formed under the laws of this state.  

            (6) “Governing instrument” means the trust instrument and certificate of trust.

            (7) “Jurisdiction” means a state, a foreign country, or a subdivision of a foreign country. 

            (8) “Person” means an individual, corporation, estate, trust, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, public corporation, government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, or any other legal or commercial entity.

            (9) “Property” means all property, whether real, personal, or mixed, or tangible or intangible, or any interest therein.

            (10) “Qualified foreign statutory trust” means a foreign statutory trust that is authorized to do business in this state.

            (11) “Record” means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.

            (12) “Related person”, with respect to a trustee, officer, employee, manager, or beneficial owner, means:

                        (A) the spouse of the person;

                        (B) a child, parent, sibling, grandchild, or grandparent of the person, or the spouse of one of them;

                        (C) an individual having the same home as the person;

                        (D) a trust or estate of which a related person described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) is a substantial beneficiary;

                        (E) a trust, estate, incompetent, conservatee, or minor for which the person is a fiduciary; or

                        (F) a person that is directly or indirectly controlled by, or is under common control of, the person.

            (13) “Sign” means, with the present intent to authenticate or adopt a record:

                        (A) to execute or adopt a tangible symbol; or   

                        (B) to attach to or logically associate with the record an electronic symbol, sound, or process.

            (14) “State” means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

            (15) “Statutory trust” means an unincorporated entity formed under this [act].

            (16) “Trust” includes a common-law trust, statutory trust, and foreign statutory trust.

            (17) “Trust instrument” means a record other than the certificate of trust which provides for the governance of the affairs of the statutory trust and the conduct of its business.  The term includes a trust agreement, a declaration of trust, and bylaws.

            (18) “Trustee” means a person designated, appointed, or elected as a trustee of a statutory trust or foreign statutory trust in accordance with the governing instrument or applicable law.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3801; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-501; Uniform Limited Partnership Act §102 (2001); SEC Rule 144(a)(1), 17 C.F.R. §230.144(a)(1).

 

            Paragraph (1) [comment to come re top-level beneficial owner].

 

            Paragraphs (2), (6), and (16) define “certificate of trust,” “governing instrument,” and “trust instrument” respectively.  The certificate of trust is the record that under Section 201 must be delivered to a public official for filing to form a statutory trust.  The trust instrument is the transaction document that provides for the governance of the affairs of the statutory trust and that need not be made part of the public record.  Together, the certificate of trust and the trust instrument compose the governing instrument.  The term “governing instrument” is in the singular to conform with standard commercial usage.  Conflicts between the certificate of trust and the governing instrument are resolved pursuant to Section 201(d).  Although the term “trust instrument” is phrased in the singular, consistent with current commercial practice the drafting committee contemplated that there would often be more than one such instrument.  Section 104(b) makes authorization of multiple instruments explicit.

 

            Paragraph (3) defines “common-law trust” consistently with Restatement (Third) of Trusts §2 (2003), except that as defined herein the term expressly includes a common law business trust.  See also Uniform Trust Code §102 cmt. (2000).

 

            [Paragraph (9) issues to be addressed.]

 

            Paragraph (12) defines the term “related person,” which is used in Sections 507 and 607 concerning the legality of certain interested transactions.  In using but not defining the term “substantial” in Paragraph (11)(D), the drafting committee contemplated that a totality of the circumstances test would apply.  Section 512 defines the term “independent trustee” with respect to a statutory trust that is an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. 

 

            Paragraph (18) defines “trustee” as a person designated as such in accordance with the governing instrument or applicable law.  For discussion of trustee appointment, see the Comment to Section 501.

 

            SECTION 103.  DEFAULT AND MANDATORY RULES.

            (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) and the terms of the governing instrument, this [act] governs the management and affairs of the statutory trust and the rights, interests, duties, obligations, and powers of, and the relations among, the trustees, the beneficial owners, and other persons.

            (b) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), a governing instrument may contain:

                        (1) any provision relating to the management and affairs of the statutory trust; and

                        (2) any provision relating to the rights, interests, duties, obligations, and powers of the trustees, the beneficial owners, and other persons.

            (c) The terms of the governing instrument prevail over any provision of this [act] except:

                        (1) the provisions of [Articles] 2, 8 except for section 808(b), 9 and 10;                       

                        (2) the exclusion of a prevailingly donative purpose under Section 302;

                        (3) the choice of governing law as provided in Section 305;

                        (4) the provisions pertaining to series trusts in Sections 401(a), 402(b) and (c), 404, and 406.

                        (5) the standards of conduct for trustees under Section 505, but the governing instrument may prescribe the standards by which good faith, best interests of the statutory trust, and care that a person in a similar position would reasonably believe appropriate under similar circumstances are determined, if the standards are not manifestly unreasonable;

                         (6) the right of a trustee to information under Section 508, but the governing instrument may prescribe the standards for assessing whether information is reasonably related to the trustee’s discharge of the trustee’s duties as trustee, if the standards are not manifestly unreasonable;

                        (7) the prohibition under Section 509 of indemnification, advancement, or exoneration for conduct involving bad faith, willful misconduct, or reckless indifference;

                        (8) the limitations in Section 510(c) on direction of trustees that are manifestly contrary to the terms of the governing instrument or would constitute a serious breach of trust;         

                        (9) the right of a judgment creditor of a beneficial owner to seek a charging order under Section 606;

                        (10) the right of a beneficial owner to information under Section 608, but the governing instrument may prescribe the standards for assessing whether information is reasonably related to the beneficial owner’s ability to enforce its rights as a beneficial owner, if the standards are not manifestly unreasonable;

                       

                        (11) the right of a beneficial owner to bring an action under Section 609, but the governing instrument may subject the right to additional standards and restrictions including the requirement that beneficial owners owning a specified amount or type of beneficial interest join in bringing the action, if the additional standards and restrictions are not manifestly unreasonable; and

                        (12) the provisions pertaining to conversion and merger stated in Sections 701, 704, 705, 708, and 709.

Comment

            Principal Sources – Uniform Trust Code §105 (2000); Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §110 (2006); Uniform Limited Partnership Act §110 (2001); Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §103 (1996); Revised Uniform Partnership Act §103 (1997); Uniform Commercial Code §§1-302, 9-603 (2000); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806.

 

            Default Rules.  Paragraphs (a) and (b) emphasize that the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act is primarily a default statute.  Most of the Act’s provisions may be overridden by the terms of the governing instrument.

 

            Mandatory Rules.  Paragraph (c) schedules the provisions of this act that are not subject to override in the governing instrument of a statutory trust.  The provisions included in this schedule are the only rules that have mandatory application to a statutory trust.

 

            Most of the provisions scheduled in paragraph (c) concern the rights of nonparties or public filing and notice requirements.  By contrast, with two exceptions all the provisions of this Act concerning the powers and duties of a trustee, relations among trustees, and the rights and interests of a beneficial owner may be overridden or at least altered by the terms of the governing instrument.  The first exception is the mandatory prohibition of indemnification, advancement, or exoneration for conduct involving bad faith, willful misconduct, or reckless indifference in paragraph (c)(7).  This exception is familiar trust law.  See Restatement (Second) of Trusts §222 (1959); George G.  Bogert & George T.  Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees §542 (rev. 2d ed. 1993); Uniform Trust Code §1008 (2000).  See also John H. Langbein, Mandatory Rules in the Law of Trusts, 98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1105, 1121-25 (2004).  The Delaware Statutory Trust Act likewise limits the permissible scope of exoneration.  See Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806(e), which provides that the “governing instrument may provide for the limitation or elimination of any and all liabilities for breach of contract and breach of duty (including fiduciary duties) of a trustee . . . ; provided, that the governing instrument may not eliminate the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”  Limitations on permissible exoneration are also familiar corporate and alternative entity law.  See, e.g., Delaware General Corporation Law §102(b)(7); Delaware Limited Liability Company Act §18-1101; [citation to MBCA 2.02(b)(4) and/or other uniform acts to come].

 

            The second exception is contained in paragraph (c)(8), which makes mandatory the invalidity under Section 510(c) of a direction to a trustee or other person that is manifestly contrary to the terms of the governing instrument or would constitute a serious breach of fiduciary duty.  The reference to serious breach of fiduciary duty is designed to exclude an inconsequential, immaterial, or technical breach that does not harm a beneficial owner.  For some purposes, trust law distinguishes between serious and not serious breaches of trust.  See, e.g., Uniform Trust Code §706(b)(1) (2000); 2 Austin W. Scott, William F. Fratcher, & Mark L. Ascher, 2 Scott and Ascher on Trusts §11.10, p. 661 (5th ed. 2006); Restatement (Second) of Trusts §107 cmt. b (1959).  However, the effect of paragraph (c)(5) is limited by paragraph (c)(4), which allows the trustee’s fiduciary duty to be altered by the governing instrument if the alteration is not manifestly unreasonable.

 

            Paragraphs (c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(10), and (c)(11) allow the governing instrument to alter the nature of the trustee’s fiduciary obligation, the right of a trustee to information, the right of a beneficial owner to information, and the right of a beneficial owner to bring an action, but only if the alteration is not “manifestly unreasonable.”  In opting for the “manifestly unreasonable” standard instead of Delaware’s “good faith and fair dealing” formulation, see Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806(c) and (e), the drafting committee took notice of the use of the term “manifestly unreasonable” in Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §110(d) (2006); Uniform Limited Partnership Act §110(b) (2001), Revised Uniform Partnership Act §103(b) (1997), Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §103(b) (1996), and intended a similar meaning here.  See Mark J. Loewenstein, Fiduciary Duties and Unincorporated Business Entities:  In Defense of the “Manifestly Unreasonable” Standard, 41 Tulsa L. Rev. 411 (2006).

 

            Relationship to Mandatory Rules and the Uniform Trust Code.  Section 105(a) provides that the law of this state pertaining to common-law trusts supplements this act.  However, Section 105(b) provides that, except for the mandatory rules scheduled above in Section 103(c), the governing instrument of a statutory trust may override or modify the application to the statutory trust of any rule pertaining to common-law trusts.  Accordingly, in an enacting jurisdiction that has also enacted the Uniform Trust Code (UTC), the UTC will apply to a statutory trust, but only to the extent that the Code’s provisions are not displaced by this act or the governing instrument.  No provision of the UTC, including the rules stated in UTC §105 that are mandatory with respect to a common-law trust, is mandatory with respect to a statutory trust.  Likewise, any common law rule that is mandatory with respect to a common-law trust may nonetheless be overridden with respect to a statutory trust by the governing instrument of the statutory trust.  In sum, the governing instrument of a statutory trust may override or alter any rule of trust law other than those scheduled in §103(c) of this act. 

 

            To prevent evasion of the public policy limitations on donative transfers that underpin the mandatory rules applicable to a common-law trust, see John H. Langbein, Mandatory Rules in the Law of Trusts, 98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1105 (2004), Section 302 of this Act provides that a statutory trust may not have “a prevailingly donative purpose.”  For further discussion of the relationship between this Act, the common law, and the Uniform Trust Code, see the Prefatory Note to this Act under the heading “Relationship to Common-law trusts and the Uniform Trust Code” and the comments to Sections 105 and 302.

 

            Registered Investment Companies.  The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) supersedes this Act with respect to a statutory trust that registers as an investment company.  For such a statutory trust the 1940 Act imposes additional mandatory rules.  See, e.g., the Comments to Sections 207 (name of statutory trust), ___ (interested transactions), ___ (indemnification, advancement, and exoneration), ___ (delegation by trustee), and ___ (action by trustees).

 

            SECTION 104.  SCOPE OF GOVERNING INSTRUMENT.

            (a) Except as otherwise provided in Section 103(c), a governing instrument may:

                        (1) provide the means by which beneficial ownership is determined and evidenced;

                        (2) limit a beneficial owner’s right to transfer its beneficial interest;

                        (3) provide for one or more series under [Article] 4;

                        (4) if and to the extent that voting rights are granted under the governing instrument, include provisions relating to:

                                    (A) notice of the time, place, or purpose of any meeting at which any matter is to be voted on;

                                    (B) waiver of notice;

                                    (C) action by consent without a meeting;

                                    (D) establishment of record dates, quorum requirements, or voting in person, by proxy, any form of communication that creates a record, telephone, or video conference, or in any other manner; or

                                    (E) any other matter with respect to the exercise of the right to vote;

                        (5) provide for any action to be taken without the vote or approval of any particular trustee or beneficial owner, or series of beneficial owners, including:

                                    (A) amendment of the governing instrument;

                                    (B) accomplishment of a merger, conversion, or reorganization;

                                    (C) appointment of one or more trustees;

                                    (D) sale, lease, exchange, transfer, pledge or other disposition of all or any part of the assets of the statutory trust or the assets of any series thereof; and

                                    (E) dissolution of the statutory trust;

                        (6) provide for the present or future creation of more than one statutory trust, including the creation of a future statutory trust to which all or any part of the assets, liabilities, profits, or losses of any existing statutory trust may be transferred or exchanged, and for the conversion of beneficial interests in an existing statutory trust, or series thereof, into beneficial interests in the separate statutory trust, or series thereof;

                        (7) provide for the appointment, election, or engagement of agents or independent contractors of the statutory trust or delegatees of the trustees, or agents, officers, employees, managers, committees, or other persons that may manage the business and affairs of the statutory trust, which may have such titles and such relative rights, powers, and duties as the governing instrument provides;

                        (8) provide rights to any person, including a person that is not a party to the governing instrument;

                        (9) provide for the manner in which the governing instrument may be amended, including by requiring the approval of a person that is not a party to the instrument or the satisfaction of specified conditions and, to the extent the instrument provides for the manner in which it may be amended, provide that it may be amended only in that manner or as otherwise permitted by law, but the approval of any person may be waived by the person and these conditions may be waived by all persons for whose benefit the conditions were intended;

                        (10) provide that a person becomes a beneficial owner, acquires a beneficial interest, and is bound by the governing instrument if the person complies with the conditions for becoming a beneficial owner set forth in the governing instrument such as payment to the statutory trust or to a previous beneficial owner;

                        (11) provide that a person may comply with paragraph (10) by a representative authorized by the person orally, in a record, or by conduct;

                        (12) provide that the statutory trust or the trustees, acting for the statutory trust, hold beneficial ownership of any income earned on securities held by the statutory trust that are issued by any business entity formed, organized, or existing under the laws of any jurisdiction; and

                        (13) provide for the establishment of record dates.

            (b) The governing instrument may include one or more instruments, agreements, declarations, bylaws, or other records and refer to or incorporate any record containing provisions relating to the governance of the affairs of the statutory trust and the conduct of its business.

Comment

            Principal Sources – Scattered sections of the Delaware and Connecticut Statutory Trust Acts.  

 

            The unusual principal sources citation reflects the drafting committee’s decision to collect in a single section various permissive rules regarding the scope of the governing instrument that are scattered throughout the Delaware and Connecticut Statutory Trust Acts.  The main exception concerns the allowable remedies for a beneficial owner’s breach in Section 603(c). 

 

            [Comment to be expanded to explain that this section implements Section 103(b) without limiting the generality of 103(b).]  The drafting committee concluded that the demand of third parties and transactional planners to see language that expressly authorizes specific terms justified inclusion of a detailed list in addition to the broad statement of freedom of contract in Sections 103(a)-(b) and 106.  Statutory confirmation reduces transaction costs by resolving doubts in practice over the permissibility of such provisions.  Similar reasoning underlies the provision of a detailed schedule of powers in Uniform Trust Code §816 (2000) in addition to the broad general statement in Uniform Trust Code §815. 

 

            SECTION 105.  APPLICABILITY OF TRUST LAW. 

            (a) The law of this state pertaining to common-law trusts supplements this [act].

            (b) Except as otherwise provided in section 103(c), the governing instrument may override or modify application to the statutory trust of any law of this state pertaining to common-law trusts.

Comment

            Principal Sources – Uniform Trust Code §106 (2000); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3809; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-519. 

 

            Trust Law Supplements this Act.  Paragraph (a) provides that state trust law supplements this Act and the terms of the governing instrument.  In looking to trust law to supplement this act and the governing instrument, the drafting committee was strongly influenced by the preference for trust law among existing users of statutory trusts.  This preference is evidenced by the popularity of the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, which likewise looks to trust law, in comparison to the business trust acts (such as those in Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, Oregon, Tennessee, Washington, and West Virginia) that look to corporate law.  See Robert H. Sitkoff, The Rise of the Statutory Business Trust [in progress].

 

            No Mandatory Rules Other Than Those Scheduled in Section 103(c).  Paragraph (b) confirms that, except for the mandatory rules scheduled in §103(c), the governing instrument may override any rule or law pertaining to common-law trusts that would otherwise be applicable to a statutory trust under paragraph (a).  For further discussion, see the comment to Section 103 under the heading “Relationship to Mandatory Rules and the Uniform Trust Code.” 

 

            Relationship to the Uniform Trust Code.  In an enacting jurisdiction that has also enacted the Uniform Trust Code, the joint effect of paragraphs (a) and (b) is to make the Code applicable to a statutory trust, but only to the extent that the Code’s provisions—including the mandatory rules scheduled in UTC §105—are not displaced by this act or the trust’s governing instrument.  For further discussion, see the comment to Section 103 under the heading “Relationship to Mandatory Rules and the Uniform Trust Code.” 

 

            Remedies.  The rules pertaining to common-law trusts that, unless the governing instrument provides otherwise, are absorbed by this Section for application to a statutory trust include a well-developed law of remedies for breach of trust.  See 4 Austin Wakeman Scott, William F. Fratcher, & Mark L. Ascher, 2 Scott and Ascher on Trusts §24.9 (5th ed. 2006); Uniform Trust Code §1002 (2000).  However, when a breach of trust injures the trust rather than a beneficial owner directly, such remedies are properly sought in a derivative suit under Section 609 rather than a direct suit by the beneficiary because a statutory trust is itself an entity.  See generally ALI Principles of Corporate Governance §7.01 (1994).

 

            SECTION 106.  RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

            (a) This [act] must be liberally construed to give maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract and to the enforceability of governing instruments.

            (b) The presumption that a civil statute in derogation of the common law is construed strictly does not apply to this [act].

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3825; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-546; Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act §18 (1995).

 

            Paragraph (a) emphasizes the freedom of contract afforded to transactional planners by the Uniform Statutory Trust Entity Act, which is primarily a default statute.  The only mandatory rules applicable to a statutory trust are those scheduled in section 103(c).  The drafting committee contemplated that section 106(a) would apply to the construction of section 103(c).

 

            Paragraph (b) admonishes the courts not to apply to this Act the canon of construction that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be strictly construed.  The drafting committee included this admonition because several of this Act’s provisions are designed specifically to reject the application to a statutory trust of one or more common-law trust principles.  See, e.g., Sections [____].  Those provisions, which deliberately derogate the common law, should be interpreted in accord with that purpose.        


[ARTICLE] 2

FORMATION; CERTIFICATE OF TRUST AND OTHER FILINGS; PROCESS

            SECTION 201.  CERTIFICATE OF TRUST.

            (a) To form a statutory trust, a person must deliver a certificate of trust to the [Secretary of State] for filing. 

            (b) A certificate of trust must contain:

                        (1) the name of the statutory trust, which must comply with Section 207;

                        (2) the street and mailing addresses of the designated office of the trust;

                        (3) the name and street and mailing address of the initial agent of the trust for service of process; and

                        (4) notice whether the trust may have one or more series under Section 401.

 

            (c) A certificate of trust may contain any provision in addition to that required by subsection (b) except as otherwise provided in Section 103(c).

            (d) Except as otherwise provided in Section 204(c), a statutory trust is formed when a certificate of trust that complies with subsection (b) is filed by the [Secretary of State].

            (e) If a provision of a trust instrument is inconsistent with the filed certificate of trust, a filed statement of cancellation or change, or filed articles of conversion or merger, the certificate of trust, statement of cancellation, or change or articles of conversion or merger prevails.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §201 (2001); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3810; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-503.

 

            Unlike a common-law trust, a statutory trust is a creature of statute that requires a filing with the state to come into existence.  Filing rules are typical of limited liability entities.  Such filing rules serve a notice function, alerting interested parties to creation and existence of a new limited liability juridical entity.  See Section 204(b), which entitles any person to a certified copy of a filing made pursuant to this act.

 

            A statutory trust comes into existence only if (1) a certificate of trust is prepared and delivered to the specified public official for filing, and (2) the public official files the certificate.  (For more on the meaning of “filing,” see Section 204 and the comment thereto.)  The certificate of trust provides notice to interested third parties of the existence of the statutory trust and the identification of the statutory trust’s initial agent for service of process.  Pursuant to Section 40_, the certificate of trust also puts third parties on notice if the statutory trust further segregates its assets and liabilities by creating one or more series.  

 

            Although formed by making a public filing, a statutory trust is also a creature of contract.  As such, it will be possible, though improper, for the trust instrument to be inconsistent with the certificate of trust or other public filings relating to the statutory trust.  Paragraph (d) provides that in such circumstances the public filing controls. 

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 202.  AMENDMENT OR RESTATEMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF TRUST.

            (a) To amend its certificate of trust, a statutory trust must deliver to the [Secretary of State] for filing an amendment, articles of conversion, or articles of merger stating:

                        (1) the name of the trust;

                        (2) the date of filing of its initial certificate; and

                        (3) the changes to the certificate.

            (b) A trustee that knows or has reason to know that any information in a filed certificate of trust was incorrect when the certificate was filed or has become incorrect shall promptly:

                        (1) cause the certificate to be amended; or

                        (2) if appropriate, deliver to the [Secretary of State] for filing a statement of correction.

            (c) A restated certificate of statutory trust must be delivered to the [Secretary of State] for filing in the same manner as an amendment.

            (d) An amended or restated certificate is effective as provided in Section 204(c).

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §202 (2001); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3810; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-503.

 

            Paragraph (a) provides a mechanism for updating a statutory trust’s filed certificate of trust.  Paragraph (b) imposes an obligation directly on the trustee rather than on the statutory trust. 

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 203.  SIGNING OF RECORDS. 

            (a) A record delivered by the statutory trust to the [Secretary of State] for filing pursuant to this [act] must be signed by at least one of the trustees.

            (b) Any person may sign by an attorney in fact any record filed pursuant to this [act].

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §204 (2001); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3811; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-504.

 

            Paragraph (b) confirms that the signing of a public record by a trustee is a delegable act.

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 204.  DELIVERY TO AND FILING OF RECORDS BY [SECRETARY OF STATE]; EFFECTIVE TIME AND DATE.

            (a) A record authorized or required to be delivered to the [Secretary of State] for filing under this [act] must be captioned to describe the record’s purpose, be in a medium permitted by the [Secretary of State], and be delivered to the [Secretary of State].  If all filing fees have been paid, unless the [Secretary of State] determines that a record does not comply with the filing requirements of this [act], the [Secretary of State] shall file the record and make available a copy of the filed record to the person on whose behalf the record was filed.

            (b) Upon request and payment of a fee, the [Secretary of State] shall send to any person a certified copy of a record filed in the office of the [Secretary of State] pursuant to this [act].

            (c) Except as otherwise provided in Sections 205 and 212, a record delivered to the [Secretary of State] for filing under this [act] may specify an effective time and a delayed effective date.  Except as otherwise provided in this [act], a record filed by the [Secretary of State] is effective:

                        (1) if the record does not specify an effective time or delayed effective date, on the date and at the time the record is filed as evidenced by the [Secretary of State’s] endorsement of the date and time on the record;

                        (2) if the record specifies an effective time but not a delayed effective date, on the date the record is filed at the time specified in the record;

                        (3) if the record specifies a delayed effective date but not an effective time, at 12:01 a.m. on the earlier of:

                                    (A) the specified date;  or

                                    (B) the 90th day after the record is filed;  or

                        (4) if the record specifies an effective time and a delayed effective date, at the specified time on the earlier of:

                                    (A) the specified date; or

                                    (B) the 90th day after the record is filed.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §206 (2001); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3812; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-505.

 

            For a record prepared by a private person to become part of the public record under this Act, (1) someone must put a properly prepared version of the record into the possession of the public official specified in the Act as the appropriate filing officer, and (2) the filing officer must determine that the record complies with the filing requirements of this Act and then officially make the record part of the public record.  This Act refers to the first step as “delivery to the [Secretary of State] for filing” and refers to the second step as “filing.”  Thus, under this Act “filing” is an official act.

 

            Under paragraph (a), the caption need only indicate the title of the record—for example, “Certificate of Trust” or “Statement of Change for Statutory Trust.”  Filing officers typically note on a filed record the fact, date, and time of filing.  Copies provided by the filing officer under paragraph (a) should contain that notation.  This Act does not provide a remedy if the filing officer wrongfully fails or refuses to file a record.

 

            Paragraph (c) allows most records to have a delayed effective date, up to 90 days after the date the record is filed by the filing officer.  A record specifying a longer delay will not be rejected.  Instead, under paragraph (c)(3) and (4), the delayed effective date is adjusted by operation of law to the “90th day after the record is filed.”  This Act does not require the filing officer to notify anyone of the adjustment.

 

            Consistent with the existing statutory trust acts, but inconsistent with most corporate codes, this Act makes no provision for collecting a franchise tax.  See generally Marcel Kahan & Ehud Kamar, Price Discrimination in the Market for Corporate Law, 86 Cornell L. Rev. 1205, 1218-33 (2001).

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 205.  CORRECTING FILED RECORD.

            (a) A statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust shall deliver to the [Secretary of State] for filing a statement of correction to correct a filed record if at the time of filing the record contained incorrect information or was defectively or erroneously signed.

            (b) A statement of correction under subsection (a) may not state a delayed effective date and must:

                        (1) describe the record to be corrected, including its filing date, or attach a copy of the record as filed;

                        (2) specify the incorrect information and the reason it is incorrect or the manner in which the signing was defective or erroneous;  and

                        (3) correct the incorrect information or defective or erroneous signature.

            (c) When filed by the [Secretary of State], a statement of correction under subsection (a) is effective:

                        (1) except as otherwise provided in paragraph (2), retroactively as of the effective date of the record the statement corrects; or

                        (2) with respect to persons that relied on the uncorrected record and would be adversely affected by the correction, when filed.

Comment

 

            Principal Source – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §207 (2001).

 

            A statement of correction is appropriate only to correct inaccuracies that existed or signatures that were defective “at the time of filing.”  A statement of correction may not be used to amend or revise a record that was accurate when filed but has become inaccurate as a result of subsequent events. 

 

            Under paragraph (c), a statement of correction “relates back” by way of retroactive application except against persons that have relied on the uncorrected record and would be adversely affected if the correction related back.

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 206.  CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING.

            (a) The [Secretary of State], upon request and payment of the requisite fee, shall furnish to the person making the request a certificate of good standing for a statutory trust if the records filed in the [office of the Secretary of State] show that:

                        (1) the [Secretary of State] has filed a certificate of trust;

                        (2) all fees and penalties due under this [act] or other law to the [Secretary of State] have been paid;

                        (3) the most recent annual report of the trust required by Section 215 has been filed by the [Secretary of State];

                        (4) a statement of cancellation or dissolution has not be filed by the [Secretary of State]; and

                        (5) the [Secretary of State] has not filed a notice of administrative dissolution under Section 805 or, if the [Secretary of State] has filed such a notice, that the [Secretary of State] has filed a declaration of reinstatement under Section 806.

            (b) A certificate of good standing must state:

                        (1) the name of the trust;

                        (2) that the trust was formed under the laws of this state and the date of formation; and

                        (3) that the conditions stated in subsection (a) have been satisfied.

            (c) Subject to any qualification stated in the certificate, a certificate of good standing issued by the [Secretary of State] may be relied upon as conclusive evidence that the statutory trust is in good standing as of the date of the certificate.

Comment

 

            Principal Source – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §209 (2001). 

 

            A certificate of good standing can reveal only information present in the public record.  Under this Act significant information bearing on the status of a statutory trust may be outside the public record.  [To be modified with new article 9:  Section ___ provides for the issuance of a certificate of registration for a qualified foreign statutory trust.]

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 207.  NAME OF STATUTORY TRUST.

            (a) Unless authorized by the [Secretary of State] under subsection (c), the name of a statutory trust must be distinguishable in the records of the [Secretary of State] from:

                        (1) the name of any person that is already incorporated, organized, formed, or authorized to do business in this state;  and

                        (2) any name reserved under Section 210 [or other state laws allowing the reservation or registration of business names, including fictitious or assumed name statutes].

            (b) The name of a statutory trust may contain the words: “company”, “association”, “club”, “foundation”, “fund”, “institute”, “society”, “union”, “syndicate”, “limited”, or “trust”, or words or abbreviations of similar import, and may contain the name of a beneficial owner, a trustee, or any other person.

            (c) A statutory trust may apply to the [Secretary of State] for authorization to use a name that does not comply with subsection (a).  The [Secretary of State] shall authorize use of the name applied for if, as to a conflicting name:

                        (1) the present user, registrant, or owner of the conflicting name consents in a signed record to the use and submits an undertaking in a form satisfactory to the [Secretary of State] to dissolve or to change the conflicting name to a name that complies with subsection (a) and is distinguishable in the records of the [Secretary of State] from the name applied for;

                        (2) the applicant delivers to the [Secretary of State] a certified copy of the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction establishing the applicant’s right to use in this state the name applied for; or

                        (3) the applicant delivers to the [Secretary of State] proof satisfactory to the [Secretary of State] that the present user, registrant, or owner of the conflicting name:

                                    (A) has merged with the applicant;

                                    (B) has been converted into the applicant;  or

                                    (C) has transferred substantially all of its assets, including the conflicting name, to the applicant.

            (d) Subject to Section ___, this section applies to any foreign statutory trust doing business in this state, having a certificate of qualification to do business in this state, or applying for a certificate of qualification.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §108 (2001); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3814. 

 

            The drafting committee opted not to require that the name of a statutory trust contain a traditional limited liability appellation.  Such a requirement would be inconsistent with current practice under the Delaware Act, though the drafting committee contemplated that an enacting jurisdiction with a strong policy regarding names of limited liability entities might modify this Section accordingly.  Moreover, other regulatory law will sometimes limit the range of permissible names notwithstanding this Section.  For example, the names of mutual funds typically do not contain a limited liability appellation, but Section 35(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which is applicable to a statutory trust that is a registered investment company, prohibits “materially deceptive or misleading” names.  15 U.S.C. §80a-34(d).  See also Rule 35d-1, 17 C.F.R. §270.35d-1 (listing types of names that have been deemed “materially deceptive or misleading”).

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 208.  RESERVATION OF NAME.

            (a) The exclusive right to the use of a name that complies with Section 207 may be reserved by:

                        (1) a person intending to form a statutory trust under this [act] and adopt the name;

                        (2) a statutory trust or a qualified foreign statutory trust intending to adopt the name;

                        (3) a foreign statutory trust intending to obtain a certificate of qualification to do business in this state and adopt the name;

                        (4) a person intending to organize a foreign statutory trust and intending to have it obtain a certificate of qualification to do business in this state and adopt the name;

                        (5) a foreign statutory trust formed under the name; or

                        (6) a foreign statutory trust formed under a name that does not comply with Section 207, but the name reserved under this paragraph may differ from the foreign statutory trust’s name only to the extent necessary to comply with Section 207.

            (b)  A person may apply to reserve a name under subsection (a) by delivering to the [Secretary of State] for filing an application that states the name to be reserved and the paragraph of subsection (a) that applies.  If the [Secretary of State] finds that the name is available for use by the applicant, the [Secretary of State] shall file a statement of name reservation and thereby reserve the name for the exclusive use of the applicant for a 120-day period.

            (c)  An applicant that has reserved a name pursuant to subsection (b) may reserve the same name for additional 120-day periods.  A person having a current reservation for a name may not apply for another 120-day period for the same name until 90 days have elapsed under the current reservation.

            (d)  A person that has reserved a name under this section may deliver to the [Secretary of State] for filing:

                        (1) a notice of transfer that states the reserved name, the name and street and mailing addresses of some other person to which the reservation is to be transferred, and the paragraph of subsection (a) that applies to the other person; or

                        (2) a notice of termination of the person’s reservation. 

            (e) A transfer or termination under subsection (d) is effective as provided in Section 204(c).

Comment

            Principal source Uniform Limited Partnership Act §109 (2001).

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 209.  AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS.

            (a) A statutory trust or a qualified foreign statutory trust shall designate and continuously maintain in this state an agent for service of process.

            (b) An agent for service of process of a statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust must be an individual who is a resident of this state or a person incorporated, organized, formed, or authorized to do business in this state which maintains an office in this state. 

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §114 (2001); Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3804; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-507.

 

            Under Section 201(a)(3), the initial designation of a statutory trust’s agent for service of process is made in the original certificate of trust.  Under Section 802(a)(3), the initial designation of a foreign statutory trust’s agent for service of process is made in the original application for a certificate of qualification [to be reworked after new article 9].  The initial designation may be changed pursuant to a statement of change under Section 210, by an amendment to the certificate of trust under Section 202, or by an annual report under Section 213(e).

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 210.  CHANGE OF DESIGNATED OFFICE OR AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS.  A statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust may change its agent for service of process, the address of its agent for service of process, or its designated office by delivering to the [Secretary of State] for filing a statement of change containing:

            (1) the name of the trust;

            (2) the street and mailing addresses of the current designated office of the trust;

            (3) if the designated office is to be changed, the street and mailing addresses of the new designated office;

            (4) the name and street and mailing addresses of the current agent of the trust for service of process; and

            (5) if the current agent for service of process or an address of the agent is to be changed, the new information.

Comment

 

            Principal Source – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §115 (2001).

 

            Paragraph (a) uses “may” rather than “must” because a statutory trust may also change the information by an amendment to its certificate of trust under Section 202 and a qualified foreign statutory trust may also change the information by an amendment to its certificate of qualification under Section ___[article 9 problem].  Further, if the information currently in the public record is not inaccurate, a statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust may change the information in an annual report under Section 213(e).

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 211.  RESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS.

            (a) To resign as an agent for service of process of a statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust, the agent must deliver to the [Secretary of State] for filing a statement of resignation containing:

                        (1) the name of the trust;

                        (2) the name of the agent;

                        (3) a statement that the agent resigns as agent for service of process.

            (b) The resigning agent must transmit a copy of the statement of resignation to the designated office of the statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust and another copy to the principal office if the address of the office appears in the records of the [Secretary of State] and is different from the address of the designated office.

            (c) An agency for service of process is terminated on the 31st day after the [Secretary of State] files the statement of resignation under subsection (a).

Comment

 

            Principal Source – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §116 (2001). 

           

            This section provides the exclusive means for an agent to resign without cooperation from the statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust and the only way the agent, rather than the statutory trust or foreign statutory trust, can effect a change in the public record.  Unlike most records authorized or required to be delivered to the filing officer for filing under this Act, a statement of resignation may not provide for a delayed effective date. 

 

            Paragraph (c) mandates the effective date of the agent’s resignation.  An effective date included in a statement of resignation is disregarded.  To satisfy Section 212(a), the statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust must designate a new agent for service of process before the effective date.  If the statutory trust or foreign statutory trust fails to do so, under Section 212 service on the statutory trust or foreign statutory trust may be made on the Secretary of State.

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 212.  SERVICE OF PROCESS.

            (a) An agent for service of process appointed by a statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust is an agent of the trust for service of any process, notice, or demand required or permitted by law to be served upon the trust.

            (b) If a statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust does not appoint or maintain an agent for service of process in this state or the agent for service of process cannot with reasonable diligence be found at the agent’s address on file with the [Secretary of State], the [Secretary of State] is an agent of the trust for service of process.

            (c) Service of any process, notice, or demand on the [Secretary of State] under subsection (b) may be made by delivering to and leaving with the [Secretary of State] two copies of the process, notice, or demand.  If a process, notice, or demand is served on the [Secretary of State], the [Secretary of State] shall forward one of the copies by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust at its designated office.

            (d) Service is effected at the earliest of:

                        (1) the date the agent for the statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust receives the process, notice, or demand;

                        (2) the date shown on the return receipt, if signed on behalf of the trust; or

                        (3) five days after the process, notice, or demand is deposited with the United States Postal Service by the [Secretary of State], if correctly addressed and with sufficient postage.

            (e) The [Secretary of State] shall keep a record of each process, notice, and demand served pursuant to this section and record the time of, and the action taken regarding, the service.

            (f) This section does not affect the right to serve process, notice, or demand in any other manner provided by law.

Comment

 

            Principal Source – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §117 (2001). 

 

            Paragraph (f) confirms that the authority of the Secretary of State to accept process under a state long-arm statute exists independently of paragraphs (b) through (e) of this Section.

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 213.  ANNUAL REPORT FOR [SECRETARY OF STATE].

            (a) A statutory trust or qualified foreign statutory trust must deliver to the [Secretary of State] for filing an annual report that contains the name of the trust and:

                        (1) in the case of a statutory trust:

                                    (A) the street and mailing addresses of its designated office; and

                                    (B) the name and street and mailing addresses of its agent for service of process; or

                        (2) in the case of a qualified foreign statutory trust:

                                    (A) any alternate name adopted under Section 706(a);

                                    (B) the name of the state or other jurisdiction under whose law the trust is formed; and

                                    (C) the street and mailing addresses of its principal office and, if the laws of the jurisdiction under which the trust is formed require it to maintain an office in that jurisdiction, the street and mailing addresses of that office; and

                                    (D) the name and street and mailing addresses of its agent for service of process in this state.

            (b) Information in an annual report under this section must be current as of the date the annual report is delivered to the [Secretary of State] for filing.

            (c) The first annual report under this section must be delivered to the [Secretary of State] between [January 1 and April 1] of the year following the calendar year in which a statutory trust was formed or a qualified foreign statutory trust was authorized to do business in this State.  An annual report must be delivered to the [Secretary of State] between [January 1 and April 1] of each subsequent calendar year.

            (d) If an annual report does not contain the information required in subsection (a), the [Secretary of State] shall promptly notify the reporting trust and return the report to it for correction.  If the report is corrected to contain the information required in subsection (a) and delivered to the [Secretary of State] within 30 days after the date of the notice, it is timely delivered.

            (e)  If an annual report under this section contains an address of a designated office or the name or address of an agent for service of process which differs from the information shown in the records of the [Secretary of State] immediately before the filing, the differing information in the annual report is considered a statement of change under Section 210.

Comment

            Source – Uniform Limited Partnership Act §210 (2001).

 

            A statutory trust that fails to comply with this section is subject to administrative dissolution.  See Section 805. 

 

            Under Section 103(c)(1), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 


[ARTICLE] 3

AUTHORIZATION; GOVERNING LAW; DURATION; POWERS

            SECTION 301.  STATUTORY TRUST AUTHORIZED.  A statutory trust is an entity separate from its trustees and beneficial owners.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §§3810; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §§34-502.

 

            Because this Section implements an entity conception of the statutory trust, it confirms that any prior judicial decision that holds that a common law business trust violates the state’s corporate law, trust law, or public policy is not applicable to a statutory trust created under this Act.  Examples of such decisions, which reflect the now outmoded concern that a business trust could be used to evade regulatory limitations on the corporate form, are collected in Robert H. Sitkoff, The Rise of the Statutory Business Trust [in progress]. 

 

            SECTION 302.  PERMISSIBLE PURPOSES.  A statutory trust may have any lawful purpose except a prevailingly donative purpose.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3801; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-502a.

 

            Under this Section, a statutory trust may be formed for “any lawful purpose except for a prevailingly donative purpose.”  Thus, in addition to use in a commercial transaction, a statutory trust may be used in a custodial or other context that might not be for profit.  See Section 307.  The limitation to “lawful” activity addresses the concern that some states limit the type of organizations that may be used in regulated industries such as banking and insurance.

 

            The exclusion of “a prevailingly donative purpose” addresses the concern that a statutory trust might be used in an estate planning or other donative context to evade public policy limitations on donative transfers and common-law trusts.  See, e.g., Uniform Trust Code §105 (2000); John H. Langbein, Mandatory Rules in the Law of Trusts, 98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1105 (2004).  The drafting committee declined the suggestion to prohibit a statutory trusts from having a charitable purpose on the ground that a statutory trust with a charitable purpose would be covered by existing regulatory law applicable to charitable entities.  See Marion R. Fremont-Smith, Governing Nonprofit Organizations: Federal and State Law and Regulation 187-427 (2004).

 

            By prohibiting a statutory trust from having “a prevailingly donative purpose,” the drafting committee avoided the necessity of designing a comprehensive schedule of mandatory rules applicable only to statutory trusts with such a purpose, a task made more difficult by the increasing differentiation among the states on these matters, particularly with respect to the rights of the settlor’s creditors in a self-settled trust and the continued application of the Rule Against Perpetuities to interests held in trust.  See Robert H. Sitkoff & Max M. Schanzenbach, Jurisdictional Competition for Trust Funds: An Empirical Analysis of Perpetuities and Taxes, 115 Yale L.J. 356 (2005). 

 

            Examples of mandatory rules applicable to common-law trusts that drafters might otherwise try to avoid by using a statutory trust include the following:

·        the duty of a trustee to act in good faith and in accordance with the terms and purposes of the trust and the interests of the beneficiaries;

·        the requirement that a trust and its terms be for the benefit of one or more ascertainable beneficiaries, and that the trust have a purpose that is lawful, not contrary to public policy, and possible to achieve;

·        the power of the court to modify or terminate a trust;

·        the effect of a spendthrift provision and the rights of the settlor’s and the beneficiary’s creditors and assignees to reach the assets of a trust;

·        the power of the court to adjust a trustee’s compensation specified in the terms of the trust which is unreasonably low or high;

·        the power of the court to remove a trustee for a serious breach of trust;

·        the duty of the trustee to give information and make reports concerning the administration of the trust to the beneficiary;

·        the effect of an exoneration clause that purports to limit or eliminate the duties or liabilities of a trustee to a beneficiary;

·        the rights of a party, other than a trustee or beneficiary, that transacts with the trustee in the trustee’s capacity as such;  

·        the rules against perpetuities, accumulations of income, and suspension of the power of alienation; and

·        the power of the court to take such action and exercise such jurisdiction as may be necessary in the interests of justice.

 

Most of the foregoing rules are referenced in Uniform Trust Code §105 (2000), the Code’s schedule of mandatory rules.  For discussion of why the rules that are mandatory with respect to a common-law trust are not mandatory with respect to a statutory trust, see the comments to Sections 103 and 105.

 

            [Discussion of series purpose provision and cross-reference to come.]

 

            Under Section 103(c)(2), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 303.  STATUTORY TRUST SOLELY LIABLE FOR DEBTS, OBLIGATIONS, AND OTHER LIABILITIES OF STATUTORY TRUST.  A debt, obligation, or other liability of a statutory trust is solely a debt, obligation, or other liability of the trust.  A beneficial owner, trustee, agent of the trust, or agent of the trustee is not personally liable, directly or indirectly, by way of contribution or otherwise, for a debt, obligation, or other liability of the trust solely by reason of being or acting as a trustee, beneficial owner, agent of the trust, or agent of the trustee.

Comment

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3803; Connecticut Statutory trust Act §34-523; Revised Uniform Partnership Act §306 (1994); Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §303; Uniform Limited Partnership Act §§303, 404 (2001); Uniform Trust Code §507 (2000).

 

            This section implements the concept that the statutory trust is a legal entity separate from the trustee and beneficial owner in three ways.  First, this section confirms that a trustee, as a manager of the statutory trust, is not liable for the debts, obligations, and liabilities of the statutory trust.  As such, this section overrides the outmoded common law rule that held the trustee liable for the debts of the trust and then gave the trustee a right to indemnity out of the trust fund.  Compare Restatement (Second) of Trusts §§244, 261 (1959) (stating the old rule), with Uniform Trust Code §1010 (2000) (eliminating the personal liability of the trustee for debts, obligations, and liabilities arising in the trustee’s fiduciary capacity).  However, nothing in this Section limits the personal liability of the trustee to the statutory trust for breach of duty under Section 505.  [Connection to series rules and shield to come.]

 

            Second, this section confirms that the statutory trust, not the agents of the statutory trust or the trustee, is liable for the debts, obligations, and liabilities of the trust incurred by an agent of the trust or the trustee acting on behalf of the trust or the trustee. 

 

            Third, this section confirms the limited liability of a beneficial owner and trustee by providing that the beneficial owner or trustee of a statutory trust is not liable for the debts, obligations, or liabilities of the statutory trust.  An agent of the beneficial owner or trustee is likewise not liable for the debts, obligations, or liabilities of the statutory trust.  This section therefore confirms that the “control test” of Williams v. Inhabitants of Milton, 102 N.E. 355 (Mass. 1913), and Restatement (Second) of Agency §14B (1958), is not applicable to a statutory trust.  Under the control test, if a beneficial owner of a common law business trust had a say in the administration of the trust or the right to remove and replace the trustees, the beneficial owner might be held liable for the debts of the trust.  By contrast, under this section a beneficial owner may participate in the management of the statutory trust without exposure to liability for the debts of the statutory trust.  For discussion of a beneficial owner’s limited liability under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, see Wendell Fenton & Eric A. Mazie, Delaware Statutory Trusts, in 2 R. Franklin Balotti & Jesse A. Finkelstein, The Delaware Law of Corporations & Business Organizations §19.3 (3d ed. 2005 Supp.). 

 

            SECTION 304.  RIGHTS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER AND TRUSTEE IN TRUST PROPERTY.

            (a) A beneficial owner’s beneficial interest in the statutory trust is personal property regardless of the nature of the property of the trust.  A beneficial owner has no interest in specific property of the trust.

            (b) A creditor of a beneficial owner or of a trustee does not have the right to obtain possession of, or otherwise exercise legal or equitable remedies with respect to, the property of the statutory trust.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources - Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3805; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-516; Uniform Trust Code §507 (2000); Revised Uniform Partnership Act §203 (1994); Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §501 (1996); Uniform Limited Partnership Act §701 (2001).

 

            Paragraph (b) implements the concept that a statutory trust is an entity separate from its trustee and beneficial owners by confirming that a creditor of a trustee or a beneficial owner has no recourse against the property of the statutory trust. 

 

            With respect to trustees, the rule of this paragraph is familiar from the operation of common-law trusts.  See Uniform Trust Code §507 (2000); Restatement (Third) of Trusts §42 cmt. c (2003); Restatement (Second) of Trusts §308 (1959).  The protection afforded by this section is also consistent with that provided by the bankruptcy law.  Property in which the trustee holds legal title as trustee is not part of the trustee’s bankruptcy estate.  See 11 U.S.C. §541(d). 

 

            With respect to beneficial owners, for discussion of the parallel provision in the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, see Wendell Fenton & Eric A. Mazie, Delaware Statutory Trusts, in 2 R. Franklin Balotti & Jesse A. Finkelstein, The Delaware Law of Corporations & Business Organizations §19.4, at 19-9 – 19-10 (3d ed. 2005 Supp.).  However, [cross-reference to charging order provision to come.]

 

            For a general discussion of asset partitioning rules in organizational law, see Henry Hansmann & Reinier Kraakman, The Essential Role of Organizational Law, 110 Yale L.J. 387 (2000); Henry Hansmann & Ugo Mattei, The Functions of Trust Law: A Comparative Legal and Economic Analysis, 73 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 434 (1998).  See also Henry Hansmann, Reinier Kraakman, & Richard Squire, Law and the Rise of the Firm, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 1333 (2006). 

 

            SECTION 305.  GOVERNING LAW.  The law of this state governs:

            (1) the internal affairs of a statutory trust;

            (2) the liability of a beneficial owner as beneficial owner and a trustee as trustee for a debt, obligation, or other liability of a statutory trust or a series thereof; and

            (3) the association of property of the statutory trust to a series thereof and the liability of a series of a statutory trust with respect to the statutory trust and other series thereof.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-502; Uniform Limited Partnership Act §106 (2001); Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §106 (2006).

 

            Under paragraph (1) the internal affairs of a statutory trust formed under this act are governed by the law of this state even if the trust operates in other states.  Although the term “internal affairs” may be indeterminate at its edges, the concept certainly includes interpretation and enforcement of the governing instrument and relations among the trustees, beneficial owners, and the statutory trust.  See Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §302 cmt. a (1971) (defining “internal affairs” with reference to corporate law as “the relations inter se of the corporation, its shareholders, directors, officers or agents”).

 

            Paragraph (2) supports Sections ___ and ___ by confirming that the liability of a beneficial owner or a trustee for the debts, obligations, or other liabilities of the statutory trust is governed by the law of this state.  This paragraph is stated separately from Paragraph (1) because the liability of a beneficial owner or trustee to third parties is arguably not an internal affair.  See Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §307 (1971) (treating shareholders’ liability separately from the internal affairs doctrine).

 

            Paragraph (3) [to come].

 

            Section ___ [article 9 problem] states rules for qualified foreign statutory trusts that parallel and are analogous in scope to those of this section.

 

            Under Section 103(c)(3), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 306.  DURATION.

            (a) A statutory trust has perpetual existence.

            (b) A statutory trust, or any series thereof, may not be terminated or revoked except in accordance with this [act] or the terms of the governing instrument.

            (c) The death, incapacity, dissolution, termination, or bankruptcy of a beneficial owner or trustee does not result in the termination or dissolution of a statutory trust or any series thereof.

            (d) A statutory trust does not terminate because the same person is the sole trustee and sole beneficial owner.


Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3808; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-518.

 

            Following the corporate default rule of perpetual existence, paragraph (a) provides a default rule of perpetual existence for a statutory trust.  See also Section 801, which provides for dissolution of a statutory trust only upon the occurrence of an event or circumstance stated in the governing instrument, and Section 805, which provides for administrative dissolution.  The duration of a common-law trust, by contrast, is curtailed by the Rule Against Perpetuities.  See Restatement (Second) of Property: Donative Transfers § 2.1 (1983).  Accordingly, unless the governing instrument provides otherwise, under this section a statutory trust is exempt from the Rule Against Perpetuities.  Without taking a position on the policy soundness of the tax-driven movement to abolish the Rule Against Perpetuities with respect to donative trusts, see Max M. Schanzenbach & Robert H. Sitkoff, Perpetuities or Taxes? Explaining the Rise of the Perpetual Trust, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 2465 (2006), the drafting committee concluded that the dead-hand worries that underpin the Rule do not apply to a statutory trust.  Under Section 302, a statutory trust may not have a prevailingly donative purpose.  

 

            Paragraph (b) confirms that a statutory trust may only be terminated in accordance with the terms of this Act or the governing instrument.  Thus, paragraph (b) overrides the rules of common-law trust termination that would otherwise be applicable to a statutory trust pursuant to Section 105.  Those rules are concerned with mediating the tension between the donor’s intent and subsequent contrary preferences of the beneficiaries, see Robert H. Sitkoff, An Agency Costs Theory of Trust Law, 89 Cornell L. Rev. 621, 658-63 (2004), an issue that is not applicable to a statutory trust because a statutory trust under this Act may not have a prevailingly donative purpose.  Instead, the drafting committee contemplated that pursuant to Section 104(b)(9) the governing instrument would provide for termination of the statutory trust or modification of the governing instrument if such provisions are desirable.

 

            Paragraph (c) confirms that the rule of partnership law under which a partnership is dissolved upon the death or incapacity of one of the partners does not apply to a statutory trust or any series thereof . 

 

            Paragraph (d) overrides the application to a statutory trust under Section 105 of the common law rule of merger whereby legal and equitable title to the trust property merge and the trust terminates if the same person is the sole trustee and sole beneficiary.  See Restatement (Third) of Trusts §69 (2003); Restatement (Second) of Trusts §341 (1959); Comment, The Doctrine of Merger as Applied to Commercial Trusts, 29 Yale L.J. 97 (1919). 

 

            SECTION 307.  POWER TO HOLD PROPERTY; TITLE TO TRUST PROPERTY.  A statutory trust has the power to hold or take title to property in its own name, or in the name of a trustee in the trustee’s capacity as trustee, whether in an active, passive, or custodial capacity. 

Comment

            Principal Source – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3801; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-502a.

 

            This Section implements the concept that a statutory trust is an entity separate from its trustee and beneficial owners by confirming that a statutory trust may transact in its own name.  The property of a common-law trust, by contrast, must be held in the name of the trustee as such. 

 

            However, this section also permits the statutory trust to take title to property in the name of the trustee in the trustee’s capacity as such even though the trust can hold property in its own name.  The drafting committee reasoned that this provision would be useful for a statutory trust that has dealings in a state that has not provided for a statutory trust entity.  Property ownership by a trustee in the trustee’s capacity as such is familiar from the use of common-law trusts.  To police the boundary of the trustee’s personal assets and the assets of the trust, the common law imposes on the trustee duties to earmark trust property and not to commingle it with the trustee’s own.  See Uniform Trust Code §810 (2000); Restatement (Third) of Trusts §84 (2007); Restatement (Second) of Trusts §179 (1959).  The drafting committee contemplated that under appropriate circumstances Section 505(b) would be read to require similar conduct by a trustee of a statutory trust that takes title to property of the statutory trust in the name of the trustee in the trustee’s capacity as such.

 

 

            SECTION 308.  POWER TO SUE AND BE SUED.

            (a) A statutory trust has the power to sue and be sued in its own name. 

            (b) Except as otherwise provided in [Article] 4, property of a statutory trust held in the name of the statutory trust or by the trustee in the trustee’s capacity as trustee is subject to attachment and execution to satisfy a debt, obligation, or other liability of the trust. 

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §§3803-3805; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §§34-518, 34-523; Uniform Limited Partnership Act §303 (2001).

 

            Paragraph (a) implements the concept that a statutory trust is an entity separate from the trustee and beneficial owner by confirming that a statutory trust has the power to sue and be sued in its own name. 

 

Paragraph (b) addresses the attachment and execution of a statutory trust’s property subject to the possibility that the statutory trust has formed one or more series under Article 4.


[ARTICLE 4]

 

SERIES TRUSTS

 

 

            SECTION 401.  SERIES OF STATUTORY TRUST. 

            (a) The governing instrument may provide for designated series of beneficial owners or beneficial interests having separate rights, powers, or duties with respect to specified property or obligations of the statutory trust.

            (b) A series of a statutory trust is not an entity separate from the statutory trust. 

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806.

 

            Paragraph (a) of this section confirms that a statutory trust may be organized with one or more series. 

           

            Paragraph (b) [discussion of non-entity status to come, including the points that we are making explicit what is implicit in the Delaware act, that we decided against specifying entity type powers that are not granted (such as the power to sue and be sued in its own name) to avoid a negative implication, and that entity status for tax purposes is a separate question not addressed here].

 

            Under Section 103(c)(4), paragraph (b) of this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 402.  LIABILITY OF SERIES.  

            (a) Subject to subsection (b), if a statutory trust has one or more series as provided in Section 401:

                        (1) a debt, obligation, or other liability incurred or otherwise existing with respect to the property of a particular series is enforceable against the property of the series only, and not against the property of the trust generally or any other series thereof; and

                        (2) none of the debts, obligations, or other liabilities incurred or otherwise existing with respect to the trust generally or the property of any other series thereof is enforceable against the property of the series;

            (b) Section (a) applies only if:

                        (1) records are maintained for the series that reasonably identify the property of the series, including by specific listing, category, type, quantity, or computational or allocational formula or procedure, including a percentage or share of any property, or by any other method where the identity of the property of the series is objectively determinable; and

                        (2) notice of series is set forth in the certificate of trust pursuant to Section 201(b)(4).

            (c) For purposes of [Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act or other state fraudulent transfer act], the association, disassociation, or reassociation of property with a series is a transfer of that property.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3804; Delaware Limited Liability Company Act §18-215.

 

            Paragraph (a) provides that if a statutory trust creates one or more series under Section 401 and satisfies the conditions of paragraph (b), the debts, liabilities, and other obligations of a particular series are enforceable against the property of that series only.  In such circumstances, the debts, liabilities, and other obligations of the trust generally and any other series thereof are not enforceable against the property of the series.  [Discussion of the common creditor problem and the idea of the trust as a separate bucket from each series to come.]

 

            Paragraph (b) sets forth two conditions that must be satisfied before the liability-limiting rules of paragraph (a) may apply:  (1) records must be maintained that reasonably identify the property of the series, and (2) notice of the limitation on liabilities of a series must be set forth in the certificate of trust. 

 

            The earmarking requirement of paragraph (b)(1) safeguards the separate interests of the beneficial owners of each series by clarifying the boundaries between the property and liabilities of each series.  For similar reasons, the earmarking requirement also protects third parties that deal with a series trust.  Third parties are further protected by paragraph (b)(2), which conditions limited liability across series on notice in the certificate of trust that the trust might have one or more series.           

 

            Failure to satisfy paragraph (b) exposes the property of one series to the creditors of another series and the creditors of the trust generally.  In such a case, the failure to maintain separate records would likely amount to a breach of trust under Section 505, remediable by a beneficial owner in a derivative or direct suit against the trustee.  [further discussion of trust versus series level buckets to come.]

 

            Paragraph (c) addresses the concern that [discussion to come].

 

            Under Section 103(c)(4), paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Section are not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

 

            SECTION 403.  GOVERNANCE OF SERIES.  The governing instrument may grant to, or withhold from, all or certain trustees or beneficial owners, or a specified series of beneficial owners, the right to vote, separately or with any or all other trustees or beneficial owners, or series of beneficial owners, on any matter.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources[to come].

 

            [Default rule notation and discussion of section to come.]

 

            SECTION 404.  SEPARATE PURPOSE OF SERIES.  A series of a statutory trust may have a separate purpose from the trust or any other series thereof provided that the purpose of the series is lawful and not a prevailingly donative purpose.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806.

 

            [discussion and cross-reference to Section 302 to come.]

 

            Under Section 103(c)(4), this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

            SECTION 405.  SERIES TRUST AS INVESTMENT COMPANY.  If a statutory trust is a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, [as amended,] 15 U.S.C. Section 80a-1 et seq., [or any successor statute thereto,] [and any regulations issued thereunder,] any series of beneficial interests established by the governing instrument of the trust is a series preferred in distribution of property or payment of dividends over all other series with respect to property specifically allocated to the series under Section 18 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, [as amended,] 15 U.S.C. Section 80a-1 et seq., or any amendment or successor provision, [and any regulations issued thereunder].

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3805.

 

The organization of a master statutory trust with several series is particularly common among statutory trusts that are registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, 15 U.S.C. Sections 80a-1 et seq. (the “1940 Act”).

 

[Remainder of comment to come.]

 

 

            SECTION 406.  DISSOLUTION OF SERIES.

            (a) A series of a statutory trust may be dissolved or its property distributed without causing the dissolution of the trust or any other series thereof.

            (b) A series is dissolved, and its activities must be wound up, upon the occurrence of an event or circumstance that the governing instrument states causes dissolution.

            (c) Upon dissolution of a series, the persons that under the governing instrument are responsible for winding up the affairs of the series may cause the statutory trust take all actions as are permitted under Section 802(c), shall provide for the claims and obligations of the series as provided in Sections 803 and 804, and distribute the property of the series as provided in Section 808.

            (d) Any person, including a trustee, that under the governing instrument is responsible for winding up the affairs of a series under subsection (a) is not liable to the claimants of the dissolved series by reason of the person’s actions in winding up the series if the person complied with this section.

Comment

            Principal Source – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3808; Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §§701-02 (2006).

 

            Under Section 103(c)(4), paragraph (c) of this Section is not subject to override by the governing instrument. 

 

 


[ARTICLE 5]

TRUSTEES AND TRUST MANAGEMENT

            SECTION 501.  MANAGEMENT OF STATUTORY TRUST.  The business and affairs of a statutory trust are managed by or under the authority of its trustees.

Comment

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act §34-517; Uniform Limited Partnership Act §105 (2001); Delaware General Corporation Law §141; Revised Model Business Corporation Act §8.01 (2002).

 

            Section 102(18) defines the term “trustee” as a person designated as such in accordance with the governing instrument or applicable law.  Section 104(b)(5)(C) confirms that the governing instrument may provide for trustee appointment.  However, because no provision in this Act provides default rules for trustee appointment, if the governing instrument does not provide for trustee appointment, then under Section 105 the applicable law is the state’s law pertaining to trustee appointment in common-law trusts.  For treatment of the default rules of trustee appointment, removal, and succession in common-law trusts, see Restatement (Third) of Trusts §§31-37 (2003); Uniform Trust Code §§701-02, 704-06 (2000); Restatement (Second) of Trusts §§101, 106-08 (1959).

 

            SECTION 502.  TRUSTEE POWERS.  A trustee may exercise:

            (1) powers conferred by the governing instrument;

            (2) except as limited by the governing instrument, any other powers necessary or convenient to carry out the business and affairs of the statutory trust; and

            (3) any other powers conferred by this [act].

Comment

            Principal Source –Uniform Trust Code §815 (2000). 

 

            This section is intended to grant trustees the broadest possible powers.  Hence, this section overrides the application to a statutory trust under Section 105 of the outmoded common law rule that a trustee has only those powers granted by the trust instrument.  See Uniform Trust Code §815 (2000); Restatement (Third) of Trusts §85 cmt. a (2007). 

 

            However, the existence of a power, regardless of its source, does not speak to the question whether the exercise of that power in a particular case is consistent with the trustee’s fiduciary obligation.  The trustee’s exercise of the broad powers conferred by this section is always subject to the trustee’s fiduciary obligations.  See Uniform Trust Code §815 cmt. (2000); Restatement (Third) of Trusts §§70, 86 (2007); John H. Langbein, The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts, 105 Yale L.J. 625, 640-43 (1995). 

 

 

            SECTION 503.  ACTION BY TRUSTEES.  On any matter that is to be acted on by trustees:

            (1) the trustees act by majority of their number;

            (2) the trustees may act without a meeting, without previous notice, and without a vote, if a consent or consents, in a record, setting forth the action so taken, are signed by the minimum number of trustees necessary to authorize or take the action at a meeting at which all trustees entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, but prompt notice of the action must be given to those trustees that did not consent; and

            (3) a trustee may vote in person or by proxy, but, if by proxy, the proxy must be in a signed record.

Comment

 

            Principal Sources – Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806; Connecticut Statutory Trust Act § 34-517; Delaware General Corporation law §228; Uniform Trust Code §703 (2000).

 

            In accord with Uniform Trust Code §703(a) (2000) and Restatement (Third) of Trusts §39 (2003), paragraph (a)(1) rejects the common law rule requiring unanimity among the trustees of a private trust, replacing it with a default rule requiring a majority of the trustees. 

 

            The remainder of this section allows for maximum flexibility in the mechanics of allowing the trustees to act or vote on actions.  Section 104(b)(4) confirms that the rules stated in this Section are subject to override by the governing instrument.

 

            The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires a mutual fund’s investment advisory contract, underwriting contract, fidelity bond, independent public accountants, and other such matters to be approved by the trustees of the mutual fund.  See 15 U.S.C. § 80a-15(a); 15 U.S.C. 80a-31(a); 17 C.F.R. § 270.17g-1.  Investment advisory and underwriting contracts, and selection of independent public accountants, must be approved by the noninterested trustees at an in-person meeting.  See 15 U.S.C. §80a-15(c); 15 U.S.C. 80a-31(a).

 

           

            SECTION 504.  PROTECTION OF PERSON DEALING WITH TRUSTEE.

            (a) A person, other than a beneficial owner, that in good faith assists a trustee, or that in good faith and for value deals with a trustee, without knowledge that the trustee is exceeding or improperly exercising the trustee’s power, is protected from liability as if the trustee properly exercised the power.

            (b)  A person, other than a beneficial owner, that in good faith deals with a trustee is not required to inquire into the extent of a trustee’s power or the propriety of its exercise.

             (c)  A person that in good faith delivers assets to a trustee need not ensure their proper application.

            (d)  A person, other than a beneficial owner, that in good faith assists a former trustee as if the former trustee were still trustee, or that in good faith and for value deals with a former trustee as if the former trustee were still trustee, without knowledge that the trusteeship has terminated is protected from liability as if the former trustee were still a trustee.

Comment

            Principal Source – Uniform Trust Code §1012 (2000). 

 

            Paragraph (a) protects two different classes of persons: (1) a person other than a beneficial owner that assists a trustee with a transaction, and (2) a person other than a beneficial owner that deals with the trustee for value.  As long as the assistance was provided or the transaction was entered into in good faith and without knowledge that the trustee was exceeding or improperly exercising the trustee’s powers, a third person in either category is protected in the transaction. 

 

            Paragraph (b) confirms that a third party that is acting in good faith is not charged with a duty to inquire into the extent of a trustee’s power or the propriety of its exercise.  The third party may assume that the trustee has the necessary power.  Paragraph (b) therefore overrides the application to a statutory trust under Section 105 of the common law rule that a third party is charged with constructive notice of the trust instrument and its contents.  See George G. Bogert & George T. Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees §897 (Rev. 2d ed. 1995); 4 Austin W. Scott & William F. Fratcher, The Law of Trusts §297 (4th ed. 1989).

 

            Paragraph (c) protects any person, including a beneficial owner, that in good faith delivers property to a trustee.  The standard of protection in Restatement (Second) of Trusts §321 (1959) is phrased differently, but the result is similar.  Under the Restatement (Second) of Trusts, the person delivering property to a trustee is liable if at the time of the delivery the person had notice that the trustee was misapplying or intending to misapply the property.

 

            Paragraph (d) extends the protections afforded by this section to assistance provided to or dealings for value with a former trustee.  The third party is protected as if the former trustee still held the office if the third party acted in good faith.

 

            SECTION 505.  STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR TRUSTEES.

            (a)  In discharging the duties of trusteeship, a trustee shall act in good faith and in a manner that the trustee reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the statutory trust.

            (b) A trustee shall discharge its duties with the care that a person in a similar position would reasonably believe appropriate under similar circumstances.

 

Comment

            Principal Source – Revised Model Business Corporation Act §8.30 (2002). 

            To police the exercise of the trustee’s broad powers under Section 502, this section subjects the trustee to fiduciary duties of loyalty (paragraph (a)) and care (paragraph (b)) akin to those of a corporate director. 

 

            Under Section 103(c)(5), the trustee’s standards of conduct under this section are mandatory rules that are not subject to override by the governing instrument.  However, the governing instrument may prescribe the standards by which good faith, best interests of the statutory trust, and care that a person in a similar position would reasonably believe appropriate under similar circumstances are determined provided that the standards are not manifestly unreasonable.  Compare Delaware Statutory Trust Act §3806(c), which provides that a trustee’s fiduciary duties “may be expanded or restricted or eliminated by provisions in the governing instrument; provided, that the governing instrument may not eliminate the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing,” and §3806(e), which provides that a “governing instrument may provide for the limitation or elimination of any and all liabilities for . . . breach of duties (including fiduciary duties) . . .; provided, that a governing instrument may not limit or eliminate liability for any act or omission that constitutes a bad faith violation of the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing.”

 

            The drafting committee opted to model the trustee’s duties on the corporate fiduciary obligation as stated in Revised Model Business Corporation Act §8.30 (2002) rather than the more restrictive trust law fiduciary obligation because the statutory trust is used chiefly as a mode of business organization.  Unlike the trust law fiduciary obligation, which evolved in the context of donative transfers, the corporate law fiduciary obligation evolved to serve the needs of commercial actors.  For a statement of the duties of loyalty and prudence in trust law, see Restatement (Third) of Trusts §§77-78 (2007).  For a comparison, see Robert H. Sitkoff, Trust Law, Corporate Law, and Capital Market Efficiency, 28 J. Corp. L. 565, 572-82 (2003).  See also the sources cited in the Comment to Section ­­___[interested transactions].

 

 

            SECTION 506.  GOOD-FAITH RELIANCE.  A trustee, officer, employee, manager, or committee of a statutory trust, or other person designated pursuant to Section 104(a)(7), is not liable to the trust or to a beneficial owner for breach of any duty, including a fiduciary duty, to the extent the breach resulted from the good-faith reliance on:

            (1) the terms of the governing instrument;

            (2) the records of the statutory trust; or

            (3) the opinions, reports, or statements of another person that are in the other person’s professional or expert competence and are made or delivered to the trustee, officer, employee, manager, or committee of a statutory trust, or other person designated pursuant to Section 104(b)(7).