D R A F T
FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
PROTECTION OF CHARITABLE ASSETS ACT
_____________________________________________________
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAW
_____________________________________________________
For April 1 – 3, 2011 Committee Meeting
With Prefatory Note and Revised Comments
Copyright © 2011
By
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
____________________________________________________________________________________________
The ideas and conclusions
set forth in this draft, including the proposed statutory language and any
comments or reporter’s notes, have not been passed upon by the National
Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws or the Drafting
Committee. They do not necessarily
reflect the views of the Conference and its Commissioners and the Drafting
Committee and its Members and Reporter.
Proposed statutory language may not be used to ascertain the intent or
meaning of any promulgated final statutory proposal.
March 30, 2011
DRAFTING COMMITTEE ON PROTECTION OF CHARITABLE ASSETS ACT
The Committee appointed by and
representing the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in drafting
this Act consists of the following individuals:
K. KING BURNETT, P.O. Box 910, Salisbury, MD 21803-0910, Chair
JAMES BOPP, 1 S. 6th St., Terre Haute, IN 47807
MARY JO H. DIVELY, Carnegie Mellon University, Warner Hall, 6th Floor, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213
BARRY C. HAWKINS, 300 Atlantic St., Stamford, CT 06901
LYLE W. HILLYARD, 595 S. Riverwoods Pkwy., Suite 100, Logan, UT 84321
THOMAS L. JONES, University of Alabama Law School, University Station, P. O. Box 865557, Tuscaloosa, AL 35486-0050
CARL H. LISMAN, 84 Pine St., P.O. Box 728, Burlington, VT 05402
JOHN J. MCAVOY, 3110 Brandywine St., N.W., Washington, DC 20008
FREDERICK P. STAMP, U.S. District Court, P.O. Box 791, Wheeling, WV 26003
CHARLES A. TROST, 511 Union St., Suite, 2700, Nashville, TN 37219-1760
DAVID S. WALKER, Drake University Law School, 2507 University Ave., Des Moines, IA 50311
SUSAN N. GARY,
University of Oregon, 1515 Agate St., Eugene, OR 97403, Reporter (November 2010 - ), Co-Reporter
(January - November 2010)
LAURA B. CHISOLM,
Case Western Reserve University, 11075 East Blvd., Cleveland, OH 44106, Reporter (December 2007 - January 2010),
Co-Reporter (January - November 2010)
EX OFFICIO
ROBERT A. STEIN,
University of Minnesota Law School, 229 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55455, President
BARRY C. HAWKINS,
300 Atlantic St., Stamford, CT 06901, Division
Chair
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADVISOR
CYNTHIA ROWLAND, One Ferry Bldg., Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94111, ABA Section Advisor
LISA A. RUNQUIST,
17554 Community St., Northridge, CA 91325-3922, ABA Section Advisor
ELAINE WATERHOUSE WILSON, 300 N. LaSalle St., Suite 4000, Chicago, IL 60654-5141, ABA Section Advisor
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
JOHN A. SEBERT, 111 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 1010, Chicago, IL 60602, Executive Director
Copies of this Act may be obtained from:
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS
ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
111 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 1010
Chicago, Illinois 60602
312/450-6600
www.uniformlaws.org
PROTECTION OF CHARITABLE ASSETS ACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 3.
AUTHORITY OF [ATTORNEY GENERAL] TO PROTECT CHARITABLE ASSETS.
SECTION 6.
NOTICE TO [ATTORNEY GENERAL] of Reportable event.
SECTION 7.
NOTICE to attorney general OF action or PROCEEDING.
SECTION 9.
COOPERATION WITH OTHER OFFICIAL.
SECTION 10.
UNIFORMITY OF APPLICATION AND CONSTRUCTION.
SECTION 11.
RELATION TO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT.
PROTECTION OF CHARITABLE ASSETS ACT
The Charitable
Sector. [Importance
of charitable sector in the U.S. and history of charitable sector in the U.S.] American charities provide a wide range of
services and benefits – from arts organizations, to hospitals, to the relief of
poverty, to educational institutions, to environmental protections. American charities manage substantial
funds in conjunction with carrying out their charitable purposes, holding some
funds for current operating needs and others as endowments. [cite to recent
data] Charities carry out important
functions, lessening the role of government in some cases and improving the
quality of life for many people.
Public confidence in charities will
help maintain the vibrancy of the charitable sector. If potential donors worry that charities will
misuse contributed funds, donors are unlikely to contribute. The good work charities do will suffer if
reports of abuse, fraud, or other types of misbehavior reduce public confidence
in the sector.
The regulation of charities remains
minimal, and yet the importance of public confidence in the sector points to
the need for some modicum of oversight.
In the charitable sector, self-regulation has always been important and
will continue to be important. [note third sector report]
The Internal Revenue Service has begun to increase its role in
charitable supervision, by expanding the information required under the Form
990 annual report that many charities must file. In order to protect the role of the states in
protecting charitable assets, the role of the Attorney General should be
clarified.
The Role of the
Attorney General under Existing Law.
The duty of the Attorney General to protect assets given to charities or
held for charitable purposes “is stated in the legal texts as an absolute duty and
is recognized in almost all of the states either by statute or judicial
decision.” Regulation of Charities in
the States 306 [need cite to this book].
Thirty-seven states have statutes related to this duty. In a few states – Florida, Mississippi, Missouri,
Nebraska, and Wyoming -- the statutory authority is limited to corporate
transactions or nonprofit corporations, and in Indiana the authority of the
Attorney General is limited to petitioning for a trust accounting. In all six of those states, the power to
enforce charitable trusts is recognized in the case law. When the Supreme Court of Virginia held that
the Attorney General did not have power to enforce charitable corporations but
only to enforce charitable trusts, Virginia
v. The JOCO Foundation, 558 S.E.2d 280 (Va. 2002), the legislature
responded quickly to clarify that the assets of a charitable corporation “shall
be deemed to be held in trust for the public” and that “[t]he attorney general
shall have the same authority to act on behalf of the public with respect to
such assets as he has with respect to assets held by unincorporated charitable
trusts and other charitable entities, including the authority to seek such
judicial relief as may be necessary to protect the public interest in such assets.” Va. Code Ann. §2.2-507.1 In Louisiana no case or statute describes the
Attorney General’s role with respect to charitable assets, although the statute
providing for cy pres proceedings requires notice to the Attorney General. In all other states the duty to enforce
charitable funds exists either in the Attorney General or in another public
official. [cite to book]
California, Illinois, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, and Washington all have registration statutes, some based on the Uniform
Supervision of Trustees for Charitable Purposes Act (1954) which this Act
replaces. (cites).
Goals
of the Act. The Uniform Protection
of Charitable Assets Act will articulate and confirm the role of the state Attorney
General in protecting charitable assets. The Attorney General’s authority is broad and
this Act will not limit or narrow that authority.
The Act will provide the Attorney General
with at least an inventory of basic information without overburdening the
charities or the Attorney General with excessive reporting requirements. The Act specifies which transactions and
legal proceedings require notice to the Attorney General and provides for
registration and annual reports for some charities. It is based on a rather minimalist or basic
platform, designed for those states that lack any significant legislation,
although all states can benefit from its concepts and clarity.
The term “Attorney General” is used
to mean the charity regulator in a state.
In many states, the Office of the Attorney General has a division called
the Charity Section or something similar.
A lawyer in that section typically has the title Assistant Attorney
General, but the person in that role may have a different title.
It is useful to remember that the Attorney
General has an educational role and a facilitative role as well as a regulative
role. Attorneys General now generally educate
charities and work with charities to help them become more efficient and more
effective. The Attorney General will be
better able to perform these roles with adequate information about the
charities operating in the state.
Which Charities Does the Statute Cover? The Attorney General has a duty to protect all charitable assets in a
state and oversight over all charities registered in a state, so the Act
logically applies broadly to charities.
Certain sections of the Act (registration, reporting, and notice) apply more
narrowly. The Act does not cover governmental
entities and businesses, except to the extent that those non-charities hold
charitable assets.
General Authority of the Attorney
General. The Act states the broad duty of the Attorney
General to represent the public interest in the protection of charitable
assets. The Act states that the Attorney General may enforce the use of
charitable assets by a charity for the purposes for which the assets were given
to the charity, may take action to prevent or correct a breach of a fiduciary
duty in connection with the administration of a charity or charitable assets,
and may intervene in an action brought to correct a misapplication of
charitable funds, a departure from the purpose of the charity, or a breach of a
fiduciary duty owed the charity.
Registration. A charity covered by the registration section must register with the Attorney
General within a specified period of time after the charity receives
property. The charity must provide basic
information about the charity (name, address, statutory agent, federal
identification number, and contact person) and a copy of the charity’s
organizing documents (articles of incorporation and bylaws or trust
instrument). The Act includes a one-page
statutory form of registration.
Annual Reports. Charities with assets above a minimum amount will file an annual report
with the Attorney General. The annual
report will provide basic information and will require that the charity attach
a copy of any report the charity files with the Internal Revenue Service (e.g.,
a Form 990 or a Form 990-EZ).
Notice of “Life Events.” One of the concerns the Drafting Committee sought to address was the
problem that occurs when an Attorney General learns about the loss of
charitable assets after a charity has disposed of the assets. The Act requires
a charity to file a notice of the following, a specified number of days [20, 30
or 60 days] before the event occurs.
Events that require notice include the following:
The transfer of assets without providing notice and before the passage
of the time prescribed in the Act or the receipt of consent or notice that the
Attorney General will take no action will be considered a violation of the Act.
In addition, if a decedent’s estate or a revocable trust involves the
distribution of property to a charity, the personal representative of the
estate or the trustee of the trust must send the Attorney General a copy of the
will or a description of the charitable interests in the trust. A charity must also send notice of revocation
or modification of a federal, state, or local tax exemption.
Any person who asserts a claim in a
proceeding involving a charity or charitable assets must give written notice to
the Attorney General. This may be the charity itself or some other
person. The notice must include a copy
of the initial pleading. The proceedings
that require notice are the following:
Cooperation with Other Officials. The Act permits the Attorney General to cooperate with any official of
the state, of another state, or of the United States. The Attorney General can provide information
or documents concerning an investigation or proceeding to the other official in
connection with the other official’s role in the oversight of charities and
charitable assets. The Attorney General
can also acquire information or documents from the other official.
PROTECTION OF CHARITABLE ASSETS ACT
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This [act] may be cited
as the [Uniform][Model] Protection of Charitable
Assets Act.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS.
In
this [act]:
(1) “Charitable asset” means property that is [irrevocably dedicated][legally committed
or held] for a charitable purpose.
(2) “Charitable purpose” means the relief of poverty, the advancement of education or religion, the promotion of health, the promotion of a governmental purpose, or any other purpose the achievement of which is beneficial to the community.
(3) “Person” means an individual, corporation,
business trust, statutory trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited
liability company, association, joint venture, public corporation,
government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, or any
other legal or commercial entity.
(4) “Record”
means information that is inscribed on a tangible medium or that is stored in
an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form.
(5) “Responsible individual” means an individual
who, with respect to a person holding charitable assets:
(A) is generally familiar with the affairs of the
person; and
(B) participates,
directly or indirectly, in the control or management of the person or, in the
case of a person being formed, will participate in the control or management of
the person.
(6) “State” means [get standard definition].
Subsection (1). Charitable Asset. The term property includes all interest in real or tangible or
intangible personal property, including remainder interests and conservation or
preservation easements or restrictions.
The requirement that the property be “irrevocably dedicated” to
charitable purposes does not mean that the property must be held in perpetuity
for charitable purposes. Instead the
term means that property will be used, whenever it is used, for charitable
purposes and cannot be diverted from the charitable stream. The remainder interest in a charitable
remainder trust is property irrevocably dedicated for a charitable purpose, as
is the current interest in a charitable lead trust, property held for ten years
in a building fund, and property given to a charity subject to a restriction on
its use.
[add
an explanation of the use of “dedicated” in connection with real property and
conservation easements]
Subsection
(2). Charitable
purposes. The definition of
charitable purposes follows that of UTC § 405, Restatement (Third) of Trusts §
28 (2003), and UPMIFA § 2(1) (2006).
This long-familiar standard derives from the English Statute of
Charitable Uses, enacted in 1601.
The definition includes purposes “beneficial to the community,” because that concept is part of the traditional definition of charitable purposes. The definition means purposes considered charitable and not merely beneficial. Many activities and organizations benefit the community, such as social welfare organizations, cooperative associations, and business entities. The definition is limited to those beneficial purposes that are charitable in nature.
Some 17 states have created
statutory definitions of charitable purpose for various reasons. See,
e.g., 10 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 162.3 (2005) (defining charitable purpose within
the Solicitation of Funds for Charitable Purposes Act to include “humane,” “patriotic,” “social
welfare and advocacy,” and “civic” purposes).
The definition in subsection (2) applies for purposes of this Act and
does not affect other definitions of charitable purpose.
Subsection
(3). Person. The Act uses as the definition of person
the definition approved by the Uniform Law Commission. The definition includes individuals as well
as entities. Charities are typically
organized as nonprofit corporations or charitable trusts and both are included
within this definition.
Subsection
(4). Record. Record is defined, using the standard Uniform
Law Commission definition, in order to use one word instead of several when the
act deals with traditional forms of paper, as well as information in electronic
form.
Subsection
(5). Responsible
Individual. This term
describes someone the Attorney General could contact for information about the
charity. Often the Attorney General will
be able to resolve a question about a charity’s use of assets informally, and
having someone identified as a contact person for the charity will make that
informal discussion more efficient and effective. A responsible individual should be someone
who is generally familiar with, among other things, how the charity is managed
but the person need not be a director or trustee. The definition is based on one in the Uniform
Law Enforcement Access to Entity Information Act (2009).
(a) The [Attorney General] represents the [public
interest] [interest of the public] in the protection of charitable assets.
(b) The [Attorney General] may:
(1)
enforce the
application and prevent the misapplication or diversion of a charitable asset in
accordance with:
(A) the purposes or
terms, if any, for which the asset was given; and
(B) the charitable purposes
of a person holding charitable assets; and
(2)
act to prevent or
remedy a breach of fiduciary or other legal duty:
(A) in the governance,
management, or administration of a charitable asset; or
(B) in the governance of
a person organized primarily for charitable purposes;
(3) seek declaratory, injunctive, or other
equitable relief to determine that an asset is a charitable asset;
(4) commence or
intervene in an action to:
(A) prevent, remedy, or obtain
damages for a violation of this [act]; or
(B) seek other remedy to
enforce this [act].
(c) The [Attorney General] may conduct an
investigation, including exercising administrative subpoena power, if the
[Attorney General] has reason to believe the investigation is necessary to determine
whether action may be advisable under this [act].
(d) This [act] does not limit the powers and
duties of the [Attorney General] under law of this state other than this [act].
Comment
One of the major goals of the Act is to articulate the Attorney General’s duty to protect charitable assets. The duty exists in case law or statutes in almost all states, but the scope of the duty is uncertain in some states. The Act will declare and clarify the scope of the duty, although the Act does not limit the authority that already exists.
The Attorney General’s duty has sometimes been described as the “parens patriae” power – the duty to protect the public interest in property that has been dedicated to charitable purposes. Unlike a private corporation or a private trust, no shareholder or private beneficiary has an incentive to supervise the proper management of the assets held for charitable purposes. The Attorney General fills this void, providing a voice for the public’s interest in charitable assets. A Massachusetts statute, first enacted in 1847, describes the duty as the duty to “enforce the due application of funds given or appropriated to public charities . . . and prevent breaches in the administration thereof . . . .” Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 12, §8.
Subsection (a) states the duty of the Attorney General over charitable assets. This subsection follows existing law in most states and may serve as a declaration of the role of the Attorney General in states in which the duty is not clear. Subsection (a) includes the duty to preserve and protect charitable assets and ensure their proper use and administration.
Subsections (b) and (c) are powers within the discretion of the Attorney General. Subsection (b) explains that to carry out the duty stated in subsection (a), the Attorney General may take action to enforce the purposes or terms for which an asset was given to a charity and may act to prevent or remedy a breach of a duty owed to a charity by a fiduciary or by another person. The Attorney General may intervene in an action involving a charity and may begin an action to enforce the Act.
Section (b)(1)(B)
provides that although a charity’s purposes need not be static, the terms of
the organizing documents in effect at the time the charity receives assets
constrain the use of those assets. The
Drafting Committee concluded that when a donor contributes to a charity, the
donor expects the charity to use that gift for the purposes for which the
charity was organized and operating at that time. A charity organized as a nonprofit
corporation can change its purposes by amending its articles of incorporation
and bylaws, but amendments should not allow the charity to change the purpose
of donations already received. See the Uniform Prudent Management of
Institutional Funds Act, §2(3) (defining “gift instrument” to include governing
documents of the charity); Attorney
Gen. v. Hahnemann Hosp., 494 N.E. 2d 1011, 1020–21 (Mass. 1986) (stating that
the charity could broaden its purposes by amending its articles, but that the
charity could not use unrestricted donations received prior to the amendment
for the new purposes); Queen of Angels Hosp. v. Younger, 66 Cal. App. 3d 359,
365 (Ct. App. 1977) (agreeing with the Attorney General that the nonprofit
corporation held assets “impressed with a charitable trust” to operate as the
articles provided and in the manner in which it had been conducting its
activities). In contrast, the Principles
of the Law of Nonprofit Organizations allow changes in governing instruments to
change the purposes of existing assets. See
Principles of the Law of Nonprofit Orgs.
§400, cmt. (d)(3) (The American Law Institute Preliminary Draft No. 5 2009)
(stating, “a facially unrestricted gift made to
a charity having a single, narrow purpose is not viewed as a restricted gift.
Rather, a donor’s desire that the gift be used for a specific purpose must be
expressed, in writing, in order for the recipient charity to be bound to use
that gift for that purpose.”).
Subsection (c) states the authority of the [Attorney General] to conduct an investigation under the Act. The [Attorney General] must have a reason to believe the investigation is necessary to determine whether further action under the Act is necessary. Some observers expressed concern that an [Attorney General] might use the power of investigation for political purposes. While the risk of misfeasance exists with any power, the Drafting Committee concluded that it could not make decisions based on an assumption or a possibility that a state official would misuse authority provided in the Act. The Drafting Committee concluded that the power to investigate is essential so that the [Attorney General] can determine whether further action is necessary. Oftentimes, the [Attorney General] will be able to resolve an issue with a charity through the exchange of information followed by discussion without the need for a court proceeding. The Drafting Committee wanted to encourage non-judicial resolution of matters involving charities so that more assets would be preserved for charitable purposes. The Drafting Committee believes the Attorneys General will exercise the authority to investigate appropriately, without overreaching.
Section 3 states the broad authority of the [Attorney General], but the authority is not unlimited. The [Attorney General]’s legitimate role is to correct abuses, but not to take over governance or to substitute the [Attorney General]’s judgment for the legitimate judgment of the charity’s board or trustees; to protect the interests of the indefinite beneficiaries of charity, while recognizing that charitable assets are private, not quasi-public property; and to protect the donor’s expressed intent and hold the charity to its expressed purposes.
Subsection (d) reflects the
committee’s intention that the statute not replace any
common law or other statutory powers the [Attorney General] may have. For example, some states regulate charitable
solicitation through other statutes.
A few states provide for the use of relators. A relator is a private person who sues a
charity on behalf of the [Attorney General]. A California statute permits persons granted
relator status by the California Attorney General to sue a charity on behalf of
the Attorney General. [cite] Pursuant to the statute,
a private person can notify the Attorney General of abuse by the charity or its
fiduciaries. The suit must be one that the Attorney General could have brought,
and the Attorney General must authorize the suit before the relator can proceed.
The private relator pays the court costs,
but the attorney general remains in control of the action.
The Act does not, either expressly or by implication, affect existing law concerning the rights of persons other than the [Attorney General] to standing in connection with a matter involving a charity.
Legislative
Note: States vary with respect to process and procedure relating to [Attorney
General] investigative authority. States
that detail [Attorney General] subpoena power in statutes dealing broadly with
Attorney General power will have no need for additional
provisions here. States that do not
provide specific statutory authority for the [Attorney General] will need to
add a section to do so. States that
provide in their statutes for Attorney General civil subpoena power
specifically in connection with another [Attorney General] function (such as
consumer protection) may want to add that language to this section with any
necessary adaptations. In many states
the [Attorney General] has civil jurisdiction but not criminal
jurisdiction. For example, in
Connecticut the Attorney General is the civil charitable regulator but if the
Attorney General wishes to initiate a criminal proceeding the Attorney General
must do so through the chief state’s attorney.
In other states (e.g. Maryland) the county state’s attorney has general
criminal jurisdiction.
[provide
references to state statutes including Illinois]
(a) The [Attorney General] shall establish and
maintain a registry of persons required to register under this section.
(b) A person is required to register under this
section if the person holds or administers charitable assets in excess of
$5,000 and:
(1)
is organized
under the law of this state or if it is a trust has its situs in this state;
(2)
has its
principal place of business in this state;
(3)
holds
charitable assets in this state other than assets held primarily for investment
purposes;
(4) conducts activities
in this state; or
(5) holds assets that
are given or committed to the benefit of a person in this state.
(c) The following are exempt from the requirement
in subsection (b) to register:
(1) a government,
governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality;
(2) an organization the
primary purpose of which is to influence elections;
(3)
a financial
institution, investment company, or storage facility that holds charitable
assets that belong to another person;
(4) an individual holding a charitable asset other than in a fiduciary capacity;
(5) a [personal representative] of a decedent’s estate that holds a charitable asset, during the period of administration of the estate;
(6) a trustee of a revocable trust that becomes irrevocable because of the settlor’s death, during a period of administration following the settlor’s death not to exceed one year[.][; or]
Alternative A
[(7) a religious organization that holds property for religious purposes, an agency or organization affiliated with and directly supervised by the religious organization, or an officer, director, or trustee of the religious organization which holds property in an official capacity for religious purposes.]
Alternative B
[(7) [religious organization as defined by Internal Revenue Code].]
End of Alternatives
(d) The following activities do not constitute
conducting activities in this state within the meaning of section (b)(4):
(1) maintaining,
defending, mediating, arbitrating, or settling an action or proceeding;
(2) holding a meeting of
trustees, directors, or members;
(3) maintaining an
account in a financial institution or an investment account;
(4) owning, without
more, real or personal property;
(5) conducting an
isolated transaction that is completed in not more than 30 days and is not in the course of similar transactions;
(6) soliciting or
accepting contributions; and
(7) making a grant to a
person in this state.
(e) A person required to register under this
section shall register with the [Attorney General] not later than [three]
months after the date the person receives charitable assets in excess of $[5,000].
(f) The registration required by subsection (b)
must include:
(1)
the name and
address of the person;
(2) the name and address
of the statutory agent of the person or the individual on whom service of
process may be made;
(3) the name and address
of a responsible individual of the person; [and]
(4) the federal employer
identification number, if any, for the person[.][;]
[(5) if the person is organized primarily for
charitable purposes, a copy of the person’s articles of incorporation and bylaws,
trust instrument, or other record, if any, that serves as the organizational
document of the person; [and]
(6) if the person is not organized primarily for
charitable purposes, a copy of the portion of the person’s articles of
incorporation and bylaws, trust instrument, or other record, if any, that
relates to the use and administration of the charitable asset held by the
person.][; and]
[(7) whether the person
has registered under [the state’s solicitation statute] and if so, under what
name and under what registration number, if any.]
(g) The registry established pursuant to
subsection (a) and records filed with the [Attorney General] are public records,
except that the [Attorney General] shall:
(1) withhold from public inspection a record or
any part of a record filed with the [Attorney General] or with a governmental
agency of this state, another state, or the United States, or any governmental
subdivision thereof, which is required by law to be kept confidential; and
(2) on the written
request of a person required to register under this section, withhold from
public inspection a record or any part of a record filed which does not relate
to a charitable purpose or charitable assets and is not otherwise a public
record.
[(h) The [Attorney General] may collect a
filing fee of $[15.00] with the registration required by this section and a
late fee of $[100.00]. The funds
collected will be used for services provided for under this [act]. The [Attorney General] may extend the time
for filing for good cause shown.]
Comment
The Act requires charities and others holding charitable assets to register with the [Attorney General] so that the [Attorney General] will have basic information about the charitable assets the [Attorney General] has a duty to protect. The Act directs the [Attorney General] to maintain a registry of the charities who must register, and the registry will serve as a resource for the public as well as for the [Attorney General]. The registration requires minimal information, to avoid overburdening either charitable organizations or [Attorneys General]. The registration function will likely move to an electronic system in the near future, thereby reducing some of the burden. Electronic registration will be sufficient to meet the requirements of Section 4, and the Drafting Committee hopes that states will soon be able to accommodate electronic registration. While a large organization that operates in many states will likely have an obligation to register in multiple states, the Act’s move toward uniformity will minimize the burden of multiple registrations and electronic registration, when it comes, will further ease the burden. The Act includes a statutory form of registration so that states can adopt a requirement that is consistent across states.
Registration is important for several reasons. First, the list of registered charities can serve as a quick resource of information for the [Attorney General] and for the public. If the [Attorney General] receives a question from a member of the public, the [Attorney General] may be able to answer the question simply by reviewing the information provided in the registration. No further inquiry may be necessary, and both the Attorney General and the charity will save time and expense.
Second, a potential donor may consult the list of registered charities to determine whether a charity requesting a donation is current in its filings with the Attorney General. If the charity is not registered, the donor will want to investigate further before making a donation. If the charity has consistently made the required filings, that information suggests a well-managed charity, with fiduciaries who comply with their duties.
Finally, the requirement to register serves as a reminder to someone organizing a charity of the seriousness of the fiduciary role an individual undertakes when acting as a director or trustee of a charity. If the individual does not want the responsibility of managing charitable assets, the individual can give the assets to an existing charity or start a donor advised fund.
Subsection (b). Charities and others holding charitable assets in money or value in excess of $5,000 must register under the Act. The Drafting Committee chose this amount because it is the same as the amount that necessitates filing a Form 1023, Recognition of Exempt Status, with the Internal Revenue Service. The information required to register with the Attorney General is significantly less than the information required to complete a Form 1023, so an organization should not face an undue burden if required to register with the Attorney General.
A very small charity will not need to register, but the Drafting Committee decided not to increase the threshold for registration above $5,000. Often smaller charities are the ones that need additional assistance from the [Attorney General] and may be more likely to encounter difficulties due to the lack of adequate checks and balances within the organization or lack of expertise on the part of the founding directors.
The Act requires registration of
only those organizations that have significant contacts in the state. The
Drafting Committee believes that the threshold strikes an appropriate balance
between the risk of overburdening charities that have little contact with a
particular state and the need for the [Attorney General] to be alerted to the
existence of charitable organizations and assets in the state.
Although the types of contact
listed in subsection (b) are not limited by the terms “substantial” or
“significant,” the intention is that a negligible level of activity or other
contact not be considered sufficient to cause an [Attorney General] to assert
protection powers. The state
constitution will control the level of activity necessary for Attorney General protection.
Subsection (b)(1).
Subsection (b)(2). The term “principal place of business” is used to mean principal place of administration, governance, activities, and operation. Although using the term “business” for charitable activities sounds odd, the term is used to bring with it the substantial case law connected with the term.
Subsection (b)(3). Simply having a bank account or investment
account in the state does not cause an entity to fall within the definition,
and financial institutions and investment companies are not included within the
definition by virtue of having accounts owned by charities, except as the
institution serves as trustee for a charity.
Subsection (c). Subsection (c) exempts a number of entities and individuals from the registration requirement.
Subsection (c)(4) excludes individuals who may hold charitable assets as volunteers but not in a fiduciary capacity. For example, a volunteer might hold assets in connection with a school’s PTO fundraiser. The PTO will register, but a volunteer who holds assets connected with the fundraiser does not need to register.
Subsection (c)(7). The Act indicates by placing (c)(7) in brackets that a state may choose to exempt religious organizations from registration or a state may provide that religious organizations must register. Religious organizations fall within the scope of the [Attorney General]’s duty to protect charitable assets, but a state may decide not to require religious organizations to register or report. A state that has a statute that defines religious organization may want to reference that statute here. [e.g. Minn.- add cite] The language in this subsection is intended to include a corporation sole in a state that has that organizational form. The language is broad and includes religious organizations as well as houses of worship. In many religions operating a food bank, a school, or other activity is a way to carry out religious purposes, so the provision is not limited to houses of worship.
The Constitutional protections of the free exercise of religion mean that the government cannot interfere with the exercise of tenets of religious doctrine. The Constitution does not prohibit registration and reporting by religious organizations.
Subsection (f). The Act requires minimal registration information. The registration must include an address, which can be the address of the charity and need not be the address of an individual. In addition to the statutory agent for the charity, the charity must provide the name of a “responsible individual.” If the Attorney General has a question or receives a complaint, the [Attorney General] can often resolve the issue with a phone call if the [Attorney General] is able to reach a person who is knowledgeable about the charity. The charity also must provide a copy of the charity’s organizing documents. These documents provide basic information about the charity, and in addition the [Attorney General]’s records may be a useful source of copies of these documents for the charity itself. Directors of charities change over time, and sometimes charities lose track of their documents, especially bylaws that are amended over the years. If the [Attorney General] maintains a registry with these organizing documents, a charity will be able to get copies of its documents if needed.
A person holding charitable assets may not be a charity. For example, a business corporation may set aside assets in a charitable fund. If the business corporation registers because it holds charitable assets, the business need only furnish the portions of its organizational documents that relate to the charitable assets. The business corporation need not provide its articles and bylaws in their entirety because most of the content of those documents will not apply to the charitable assets. The same is true for a trust if part of the trust applies to private beneficiaries and part has a charitable purpose. Only the portions of the trust applicable to the charitable assets need be provided and the rest of the trust instrument can be redacted.
Legislative Note to Subsection
(g): In some states an amendment to the state’s
Freedom of Information Act may be necessary, and in some states the state
Freedom of Information Act may require additional statutory language in
subsection (g). In other states
subsection (g) will be unnecessary because the state’s Freedom of Information
Act will apply without a provision in this statute.
(a) A person required to register under Section 4 which holds charitable assets valued in excess of $[5,000] at the end of the person’s most recent accounting period or has total revenue in excess of $[--] for the person’s most recent accounting period shall file with the [Attorney General], not later than 5 months and 15 days after the end of the person’s accounting period, a report providing and certifying the accuracy of the following information:
(1) a current list of the names of the individuals responsible for the management of the person;
(2) the person’s total revenue for its most recent accounting period;
(3) the person’s total assets as of the last day of its most recent accounting period;
(4) a description of the person’s most significant program activities, not exceeding three activities, during the accounting period;
(5) a copy of any amendment during the accounting period of the person’s articles of incorporation and bylaws, trust instrument, or other record that serves as the person’s organizational documents;
(6) whether during the accounting period the person:
(A) engaged in a reportable event under Section 6;
Alternative A
[(B) entered into a contract, loan, lease, or other financial transaction with an officer, director, trustee, or other fiduciary, either directly or with an entity in which the officer, director, trustee, or other fiduciary had a material financial interest;]
Alternative B
[(B) entered into a financial transaction that materially benefits an officer, director, trustee, or other fiduciary, other than a transaction related to the individual’s role as a fiduciary, or entered into a financial transaction that materially benefits an entity in which the fiduciary had a material financial interest;]
End of Alternatives
(C) became aware of a material embezzlement, theft, or diversion of the person’s charitable assets;
(D) became aware of use of a charitable asset to pay any penalty, fine, or judgment;
(E) became aware of the payment by an officer, director, trustee, or other fiduciary of a penalty, fine, or judgment with respect to the person; and
(F) became aware of the use of restricted funds for a purpose other than the purpose specified in the restriction;
(7) an explanation of any affirmative answer reported under paragraph (6); and
(8) a change to any information provided under Section 4.
(b) If the person is required to file a Form 990,
Form 990-PF, or Form 990-EZ with the Internal Revenue Service, then the person
shall attach a copy of the form to the annual report.
Comment
A charity with assets in excess of $5,000 or annual revenue in excess of $ [--] will file an annual report providing basic information about revenue, assets, and activities during the year. The Act requires that all charities that meet the filing requirements file a short annual report and attach a copy of the charity’s federal tax filing. The Drafting Committee concluded that having an annual report form in addition to the federal form would allow the [Attorney General] to review quickly the information provided by the charity. The annual report requires minimal information, and if states adopt the annual report form uniformly, the burden on charities required to file in multiple states will be reduced.
Subsection (a)(2) asks for the charity’s total revenue for the most recent accounting period. The intention here is to have the charity report the same number reported on line [--] of the Form 990, so that only one computation is necessary.
States that require annual reporting under a statute that regulates charitable solicitation will want to coordinate the report required here with that required by the solicitation statute and may find the reporting requirement in Section 5 duplicative and unnecessary.
The Drafting Committee noted that the reporting requirement can encourage good governance, and some committee members also noted that the small organizations are often the ones that get into trouble. The annual report can serve an educational purpose, providing a reminder of some of the duties owed with respect to charitable assets. The Attorney General needs to receive information in a timely fashion to be able to address problems before charitable assets are lost. The registration and reporting requirements are important in promoting appropriate protection of charitable assets. Further, timely filing of annual reports will give the public confidence that a charity is managed properly.
The [Attorney General] can agree to accept another required filing in lieu of an annual report. For example, in a state that requires an annual report in connection with solicitation, that filing may satisfy the requirement of an annual report under this section.
(a) A person required to register under Section 4
shall give notice in a record to the [Attorney General] not later than [20]
[30] days before a reportable event occurs.
(b) The following are reportable events under
this section:
(1) a dissolution of the
person;
(2) a termination of the
person;
(3) a disposition by the
person of all or substantially all of the person’s charitable assets;
(4)
the
consummation of a merger, conversion, or domestication;
(5) a removal of the
person from the jurisdiction of this state; or
(6) a removal of
significant charitable assets from this state.
(c) A transfer of a charitable asset in
connection with an event described in subsection (b) which occurs earlier than [20]
days after delivery of the notice required by subsection (a) to the [Attorney General]
shall be a violation of this [act] unless before the transfer the person receives
the consent of the [Attorney General] in a record to a proposed transfer or the
person receives notice in a record that the [Attorney General] will take no
action regarding the transfer.
(d) If a decedent’s estate opened by a court in
this state involves, or may involve, the distribution of property to a person
holding or authorized to hold charitable assets, the [personal representative],
not later than [ninety] days after the date the [personal representative] is
appointed, shall deliver to the [Attorney General] a copy of the will; a copy
of the petition for probate or application for unsupervised probate; and a copy of the
inventory, or if none is filed with the court, then a statement of the
estimated value of the estate, unless the distribution is a specific devise with a value of
less than $100,000 to a named person holding charitable assets.
(e) If a revocable trust having its principal
place of administration in this state becomes irrevocable [because of the
settlor’s death] and if it provides for a distribution of property to a person
holding or authorized to hold charitable assets, the trustee, not later than [ninety]
days after the date of the settlor’s death, shall deliver to the [Attorney General]
a description of the charitable interests and a statement of the estimated
value of the trust assets, unless the distribution is a specific distribution
with a value of less than $100,000 to a named person holding charitable assets.
(f) A person required to register under Section 4
shall give notice in a record to the [Attorney General] not later than [20] days after receipt of any notice of
revocation, modification, or denial of its federal or state [income] tax
exemption.
Comment
The Act requires notice to the [Attorney General]
of a variety of transactions and events that raise particular opportunities for
misapplication of charitable assets, so that the [Attorney General] has an
opportunity to monitor the events in time to prevent problems and to correct problems
that have already arisen.
Subsections (a) – (c).
Disposition or Removal of All or Significantly All
Assets. If the charity will terminate, dispose of
substantially all of its assets, or move to another state, the charity must
notify the [Attorney General] before the charity gives up control of the assets
or removes them from the jurisdiction.
This notice provision gives the Attorney General time to review the
proposed transaction and recommend changes if necessary while the assets can
still be reached. If the Attorney General
objects to the proposed transaction, the Attorney General must deliver the
objection to the charity in writing. This subsection gives the [Attorney General]
the information needed to work with the charity on an appropriate plan of
distribution or other transfer. If the [Attorney
General] and the charity cannot reach agreement, they can request a court
determination to resolve the issue.
Subsection
(d) Decedent’s Estate. If a decedent’s estate contains a gift to a charity or creates a
charity through a gift under the will, the personal representative must notify
the [Attorney General]. This notice is
necessary to protect the charitable bequest which could be adversely affected if
an heir contests the will or if the personal representative or others take
excessive fees in managing the estate.
An exception exists for a specific bequest to a named charity in an
amount less than $100,000, because the named charity will have an incentive to
monitor the bequest. The Drafting
Committee did not create an exception for residuary gifts to named charities
because the [Attorney General] may need to monitor fees that would reduce the
value of the residue,
A charity may be reluctant to challenge fees because of concerns
about public goodwill or the hope of future gifts from the same family.
Subsection
(e). Revocable Trust. Many
property owners use a revocable trust rather than a will to distribute property
at death. This subsection applies the
same notice requirement for property distributed through a revocable trust that
applies to property distributed under a will.
Subsection (f). Action Affecting Tax Exemption. The revocation of a federal or state tax exemption may signal problems with a charity that the Attorney General should consider. This subsection requires provides for notification to the Attorney General of revocation or modification of a charity’s exempt status for any tax purpose. A state may want to require notification for action affecting only a particular state tax exemption. In some states the important state tax exemption may be an income tax exemption, but in other states the property tax exemption may be of greater importance. The [Attorney General] may not need notification of action affecting every state tax exemption.
(a) This section applies to:
(1)
an action against or on behalf of a person
holding a charitable asset seeking to enforce a term relating to a gift of a
charitable asset;
(2)
an action concerning the use of a charitable
asset or a breach of duty or other obligation owed to a person holding a
charitable asset;
(3)
a proceeding by, against, or on behalf of a
person holding a charitable asset for:
(A)
instruction, injunction, or declaratory relief
relating to the management, use, or distribution of a charitable asset;
(B) construction of a
record under which a charitable asset is held;
(C) modification, interpretation,
or termination of the terms of a record under which a charitable asset is held;
or
(D)
removal, appointment, or replacement of a
trustee of a charitable trust;
(E) a challenge to the
administration of or a distribution from a decedent’s estate or a trust in
which matters affecting a charitable asset may be decided; and
(F) bankruptcy under Title 11 of the United
States Code, receivership under [state receivership statute] or a similar
receivership statute of another state, or any other insolvency proceeding.
(b) When a person commences an action or
proceeding to which this section applies, the person shall give notice in a
record to the [Attorney General]. The
notice must include a copy of the initial pleading. An order, decree, or judgment rendered in an
action in which notice is required by this section is not binding on the [Attorney
General] if the notice has not been given.
Comment
The Drafting Committee concluded that the Attorney General ought to be made aware of a wide range of proceedings that might affect charitable assets or the structure or governance of a charity. However, some states may not have the resources to handle this level of reporting. The information will be beneficial to the [Attorney General], but a state without the resources to receive and review the notices provided for in this section may not want to adopt this section or every part of this section.
The intention of this section is for the applicable Statute of Limitations to control. This Act does not change the Statute of Limitations.
Legislative Note: In states where the Attorney General is a
necessary party to any or all of the kinds of actions addressed in this
section, parts or all of the section will be unnecessary.
SECTION 8.
EQUITABLE RELIEF. If a person required to register under
Section 4, file an annual report under Section 5, provide notice of a
reportable event under Section 7, or provide notice of an action or
proceeding under Section 8 fails to do so, the [Attorney General] may seek
appropriate equitable relief.
Comment
This section articulates [Attorney General] authority to bring an action or intervene in a proceeding brought by someone else. The committee intends to make the [Attorney General] a proper party to a wide array of proceedings involving charities, charitable fiduciaries, or charitable assets, so that the [Attorney General] may exercise the discretion to participate or refrain from participating in court proceedings that relate to the [Attorney General’s] duties under this Act.
(a) The [Attorney General] may cooperate with an
official of this state, another state, or the United States, or any political
subdivision or agency of any of the foregoing, charged with the protection of
charitable assets.
(b) The [Attorney General] may:
(1) notify an official described
in subsection (a) of the commencement, status, or resolution of an
investigation or proceeding pursuant to this [act];
(2) make available to
the official information relating to a charitable asset which is relevant to
the official’s protection of charitable assets; or
(3) request from the
official information relevant to an investigation pursuant to Section 3.
Comment
This section authorizes cooperation
between a state Attorney General and relevant officials of other states and the
federal government. In some states a
charity submits reports to the Secretary of State or to other state
offices. This section allows the
[Attorney General] to coordinate with any other state agency and permits an
[Attorney General] to agree to accept reports filed with another state agency
in lieu of a report required by this Act.
SECTION 10. UNIFORMITY OF APPLICATION
AND CONSTRUCTION. In applying and construing this uniform act,
consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect
to its subject matter among the states that enact it.
SECTION 11.
RELATION TO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND
NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT. This [act] modifies, limits, and supersedes
the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, 15
U.S.C. Section 7001, et seq., but does not modify, limit, or supersede Section
101(c) of that act, 15 U.S.C. Section 7001(c), or authorize electronic delivery
of any of the notices described in Section 103(b) of that act, 15 U.S.C.
Section 7003(b).