IMPLEMENTING
LEGISLATION
An Act
To implement the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
Section 1. Short Title.
This Act may be cited as “International Electronic Commerce Convention Implementation Act of 20__.”
Section 2. Findings and Purpose.
(a) Findings
(1) The ability to employ electronic media to
finalize international contractual transactions is essential;
(2) Laws that promote predictable enforcement of transactions employing electronic communications increase the value of such transaction, support responsible domestic and international commercial practice and reduce commercial risk;
(3) The United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts (the “Convention”) achieves these objectives;
(4) Because rules validating the employment of
electronic media on an equal legal footing with pen and ink paper media as
provided by the Convention are already embodied in the text of the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, and [NOTE TO COMMITTEE –
SHOULD THIS REFERENCE TO E-SIGN BE RETAINED?] Official Version of the Uniform
Electronic Transactions Act and other consistent State Law,
implementation of the Convention may be accomplished through application of
UETA and State Law to the extent it is consistent with the UETA.
(5) Representatives of Federal and State law bodies in the United States as well as representative of global commercial interests were leaders in the development of the Convention.
(6) Implementation of the Convention by the United States would further the uniformity and harmonization of international commercial law.
(b) Purpose.
The
purpose of this Act is to implement the Convention in the United States.
Section 3. Definitions. In this Act,
(a) “Convention” means the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communication in International Contracts.
(b) “Foreign Jurisdiction” means a jurisdiction other than the United States or a State.
(c) “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
(d) “UETA” or “Uniform Electronic Transactions Act,” means the Official Text of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, prepared and published by the Uniform Law Commission.
Section 4. Electronic Contracting Provisions for
International Business Transactions
(a)
In General – Unless and to the extent otherwise agreed between parties
to a transaction, the terms and provisions of the Convention shall apply to electronic
communications which are covered by the Convention in accordance with the terms
of Chapter 1 of the Convention.
(b)
Exclusions -- The terms and provisions of the Convention shall not
apply:
(i) to
electronic communications excluded from the Convention by Article 2 of the Convention,
including electronic communications relating to contracts concluded for
personal, family or household purposes; or
(ii)
to electronic communications related to, or used in
1. A
contract or other record to the extent it is governed by
a. A law governing the creation and execution of wills, codicils, or testamentary trusts;
b. A law governing adoption, divorce, or other matters relating to family law; or
c. The Uniform Commercial Code, as in effect in any jurisdiction in the United States, other than Sections 1-107 (Revised section 1-306) and 1-206 (deleted from Revised Article 1) and Articles 2 and 2A.
2. Court orders or notices, or official, court documents (including briefs, pleadings and other writings) required to be executed in connection with court proceedings;
3. Any notice of
a. The cancellation or termination of utility services (including water, heat, and power);
b. Default, acceleration, repossession, foreclosure, or eviction, or the right to cure, under a credit agreement secured by, or rental agreement for, a primary residence of an individual;
c. The cancellation or termination of health insurance or benefits or life insurance benefits (excluding annuities);
d. Recall of a product, or material failure of a product, that risks endangering health or safety.
4. Any document required to accompany any transportation or handling of hazardous materials, pesticides, or other toxic or dangerous materials.
(c)
Exception for Transactions covered by the UETA – Unless and to the
extent otherwise agreed between parties to a transaction, to the extent that an
electronic communication would otherwise be governed by a State statute that
constitutes an enactment or adoption of, or is consistent with, the UETA, the
terms and provisions of such statute shall apply to the electronic communication. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no
limitation on party autonomy imposed under such State statute shall be given
effect with respect to an electronic communication that would otherwise be
governed by the Convention under subsection (a).
(d)
Definition of Convention – As used in this Section, the term
“Convention” means the 2005 United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic
Communications in International Contracts, ratified by the United States in
2009.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
Through this proposed
legislation the Convention is implemented as the law applicable to electronic
communications covered by the Convention.
The exclusions in subsection (b) track the exclusions in the federal
E-Sign legislation as well as the exclusions from the UETA. The exclusions have
been duplicated here to assure that the scope of coverage of the law applicable
in domestic transactions (whether E-Sign or UETA) and international business
transactions (under this legislation) is parallel. Subsection (c) preserves the
application of State law, in the form of the UETA or legislation consistent
with the UETA through an exception to preemption provision that parallels the
exception to preemption provision in existing E-Sign. The principal discrepancy between the UETA
and the Convention relates to the question of UETA limits on party autonomy
which are specifically excluded from the preemption exception, and therefore
operate to preserve party autonomy in contracts governed by the Convention.