 |
JASON
SCOTT JOHNSTON Robert G. Fuller Jr. Professor
of Law and Director of the Program on Law and the Environment
(POLE), presented “The Positive Political Economy of Alternative Institutions
for Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis” at the Annual Meeting of the
American Law and Economics Association at NYU Law School, at the Georgetown
University Law Center Law and Economics Workshop, and at the Olin
Law and Economics Workshop at the University of Virginia School of
Law. Johnston presented “On the Market for Ecosystem Control” at the
University of Virginia School of Law’s conference entitled “Saving
Nature.” In June 2001, Johnston and POLE co-hosted a major conference
on environmental and resource regulatory reform, “Covenanting the
Future: Reforming Environmental Regulation Through Innovative Resource
Land Management” (see article on p. xx). Immediately following the
conference, POLE co-sponsored a day-long Roundtable discussion on
what federal environmental and resource regulators can do to better
facilitate State environmental and resource policy innovation. |
The
Positive Political Economy of Alternative Institutions for Regulatory Cost-Benefit
Analysis, Symposium: Cost Benefit Analysis, University of Pennsylvania
Law Review (Forthcoming 2002)
On the Market for Ecosystem Control, Virginia Environmental
Law Journal (Forthcoming 2001)
Should the Law Mirror Commercial Norms?: A Comment on
the Bernstein Conjecture and its Relevance for Contract Law Theory and
Reform, Michigan Law Review (Forthcoming 2001)
Experimental Results on Bargaining under Alternative
Property Rights Regimes (co-author Rachel Croson), Journal of Law,
Economics and Organization (Forthcoming 2000)
How Does Imperfect Law Alter the Evolution of Commercial
Norms?, Michigan Law Review (Forthcoming 2000)
The Law and Economics of Environmental Contracts, in
Environmental Contracts and Other Innovative Approaches to Environmental
Regulation, eds. Deketelaere and Orts (Forthcoming 2000)
|
LEO
KATZ Professor of Law presented “Is
There a Volume Discount for Crime?” as the Fortunoff Lecture at the
New York University Criminal Law Colloquium. He spoke on “Why We Do
What We Do and Why We Do It” to the AALS panel on Jurisprudence; presented
“Why Is the Law So Either/Or?” at the University of Texas Law School;
“Conflicts of Rights and the Outbreak of the First World War” at a
conference held by Penn Law’s Institute for Law and Philosophy; “Why
the Successful Assassin Is More Wicked Than the Unsuccessful One”
at a conference in honor of Sandy Kadish; “Responsibility and Consent”
at the General Aspects of Law Workshop at the University of California
Berkeley; and a comment on the relationship between rules and laws
at the Mazatlan Conference on Legal and Political Philosophy. |
A
Comment on Scott Shapiro’s “Theory of Rules,” Instituto de Investigaciones
Juridicas (Forthcoming 2001)
Duress, in Encyclopedia of Crime and Criminal Justice
(McMillan Press, Forthcoming 2001)
Conflicts of Rights and the Outbreak of the First World
War, Legal Theory (Forthcoming 2001)
An Exchange on the Nature of Legal Theory: What We Do
When We Do What We Do: The Purposes of Legal Scholarship, 37 San Diego
Law Review 753 (2000)
The Morality of Criminal Law: A Symposium in Honor of
Professor Sandi Kadish: Why the Successful Assassin Is More Wicked Than
the Unsuccessful One, 88 California Law Review 791 (2000)
|
