Journals & Moot Court

Journals

Penn Law has a proud tradition of excellent journal scholarship. Our five journals have each been recognized nationally for their high level of scholarship, integrity, and value to the profession. In addition, students who become members on these journals find that it provides an invaluable experience both in substantive law and skills in research, analysis and expression.

University of Pennsylvania Law Review

Originally published in 1852 as The American Law Register, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review is the nation’s oldest and among the nation’s most distinguished.

• Four of the most-cited articles in history.
  Fred R. Shapiro, “The Most-Cited Law Review Articles Revisited,” 71 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. (1996).
  
  
• Ranked fourth in the number of U.S. Supreme Court Citations.
  The University of Pennsylvania Law Review had 47 citations.
  Michael M. McClintock, “The Declining Use of Legal Scholarship by Courts: An Empirical Study,” 51 Okla. L. Rev. 659 (1998)
  
  
• Ranked sixth in the number of judicial citations.
  Federal trial and appellate courts, state supreme courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court cited the University of Pennsylvania Law Review 732 times as significant secondary sources for the time periods sampled.
  Ibid.
  
  
• In 2000, ranked 6th in terms of the number of overall citations.
  The University of Pennsylvania Law Review published 38 articles and received 1759 citations.
  2000 edition of the Journal Citations Reports published by the Institute for Scientific Information.

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business and Employment Law

The University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business and Employment Law is an expansion of the Journal of Labor and Employment Law, which has published focused and cutting-edge scholarship since 1997. Building upon its decade of successful contribution to legal academia, the Journal now also provides a forum for scholarly analysis addressing all aspects of business law. The Journal's 10th Volume will publish articles and comments that address business law, employment law and the intersection of those fields. By expanding its subject reach, the Journal will strive to become the leader in business law scholarship while retaining its status as a premier employment law journal.

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law

The University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law provides a forum for the interdisciplinary study of and rigorous analysis of constitutional law. To that end, The Journal cultivates innovative scholarship, promotes critical perspectives, and reinvents the traditional study of constitutional law. To encourage dialogue about the Constitution within and between diverse communities, The Journal hosts an annual symposium and publishes via both print and electronic media. The Journal has a relationship with the National Constitution Center and has an interdisciplinary relationship with Penn’s Political Science Department, School of Social Work, the Medical School, and the Wharton School.

University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law

The University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law is a forum dedicated to the discussion of timely issues in the field of international economic law. The Journal defines international economic law as a multi-disciplinary approach that includes, but is not limited to:

• Private international transactions.
• National governmental regulation.
• International intergovernmental regulation.

The Journal provides an interdisciplinary and comparative focus through the contributions of academics, government officials, and practitioners.

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change

Started as a student-published journal in 1993, the Journal of Law and Social Change (JLASC), formerly HYBRID, has provided a forum for practitioners and academics to critically examine mainstream discourse, giving voice to those whom the traditional canons of legal scholarship silence all too often. JLASC seeks to engage its readers in dialogue and to challenge academics to make theory more relevant to the world in which we live and more accessible to those outside of the academy. JLASC publishes works from scholars, practitioners, activists, and students that present thoughtful analysis of current social issues with implications beyond the legal community.

MOOT COURT

Many students are very active in the Moot Court program at Penn Law, both at the Law School and on Penn Law teams that attend other competitions. Faculty offer support and encouragement to students who become involved in the Moot Court program, recognizing its immense value for the participants.

2L Program

Appellate Advocacy II is Penn Law’s second-year intramural Moot Court competition. Participants research and write a brief and then present their case in one or perhaps two rounds of oral arguments before a panel of students, faculty, practitioners, and judges. The results are then ranked.

3L Program

From the 2 L rankings,

• The top four students become the Keedy Cup Team who then work on a new brief in the fall semester, and then argue before a panel of distinguished jurists.
• The next three students represent Penn Law at the National Moot Court Competition (Bar Association, New York City)
• The next 14 students become members of The Moot Court Board who are responsible for preparing problems and reviewing the work of the contestants.

In recent years, students have formed their own teams and participated in various Moot Court competitions including the Merna B. Marshall Moot Court Competition (Federal Bar Association, Philadelphia Chapter), the Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition (National Black Law Student Association), and the Jessup Cup Competition (Columbia Law School).

2007 Jessup Moot Court Team

The Jessup is an international law moot court competition which involves more than 600 schools from 100 countries. Penn Law's team won the regional competition in February (including the first place award for their memorial [brief] and Alasdair Henderson GL'07's fourth place speaker award) which entitled them to March 25-31 in Washington D.C. They were ranked first in the world after the preliminary rounds with the highest raw score of any team in the 50 year history of the competition. Unfortunately the team lost a competitive run off round to the University of Ottawa so did not win the overall competition.

• Penn Law won awards for the second best brief in the world.
• Keola Whittaker L'07 won a prize for the 3rd best oralist, 1st place in the U.S.
• Omar Pringle L'08 and Alisdar Henderson GL'07 tied for 8th best oralist in the competition, 4th place in the U.S.
• Penn Law won more awards than any other school.
• Other members of the team included Misha Isaak L'08 and Haley McLoranin GL'07.
• Faculty Advisor: William Burke-White

2007 National Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition

This year's Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition began with approximately 140 teams competing from six different regions across the country.

• Two two-person Penn Law teams placed in the top three at the Mid-Atlantic BLSA Regional Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition in Pittsburgh, PA and advanced as one of approximately 18 teams to the National Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition in Atlanta, GA from March 21-25, 2007 during the 39th Annual National Black Law Students Association (NBLSA) Convention.
• Brandon Gay L'07 and Korey T. Taylor L'08, who finished second in the Mid-Atlantic region in oral arguments and also earned the regional award for Best Petitioner Brief.
• Nicholas Murphy L'08 and Joelle Webb L'07, who finished third in the Mid-Atlantic region in oral arguments.
• At the Nationals in Atlanta both teams performed well and were given positive comments on their advocacy skills, though neither team placed on the platform for oral arguments.
• Brandon Gay L'07 and Korey T. Taylor L'08 won the National Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition Award for Best Petitioner Brief.
• The Award for Best Petitioner Brief was awarded from a field of at least 65+ teams as the briefing sides were approximately evenly divided under the rules. In oral argument, teams would then have to be prepared to argue both sides and would learn which side they would argue 30 minutes before each round.
• Faculty Advisor: Regina Austin